I never said "zero btc" or "no btc" but a significant less amount.
I quoted what you wrote.
He says that the halving is consolidating mining into the strong hands - hands that don't have to sell BTC
What I understood from "hands that don't have to sell
BTC" is that 0
BTC has to be sold by those "strong hands", anyway while in the process of searching for that statement, I remembered that I know Matt's business partner Mason (from their company name), it's been a while since we talked so figured out i'd ask him if Blockware S really think that, and his answer was that "Matt will never say such a thing', which means he also understands "don't have to sell
BTC" as in 0
BTC to be sold, but we will just call it a misquotation or a misunderstanding on my side and leave it there.
Now the fact that there are some people like phill or myself who don't have to sell
BTC, or even Blockware who run about 10MW of mining gears, has nothing to do with halving, it's all about the power/business plan you have (Mason also agrees to that), phill explained in details, as far as the halving is concerned it does have a positive impact on the minimum selling pressure but is only valid for a very short period of time (right after a difficulty drop) but it's only a matter of time before miners start adding more hashrate to compete against one another, without the price going any higher, miners will be forced to sell more bitcoin since they will be getting less of it.
Another thing to keep in mind is that the minimum sell pressure assumes that miners only sell enough to pay their bills, which is a good way to run the numbers, but if you think about it, there is no reason why wouldn't miners sell more or ALL of their
BTC earnings, I am not claiming the research is wrong, I know Mason for a long time and he knows his stuff, I know and talk to many large miners, and all of them will tell you the same "we are speculating".
Do you want to hear a funny story? I personally know a guy who bought 10,000 S9s that will run on FREE power, this is only one person whom I happen to know, how many others? probably a dozen, who can count all of them and add those numbers into any research? nobody, so will the selling pressure really drop from now on (long term)? maybe yes, maybe no, IMO it's highly unlikely unless bitcoin increases in price and if we stay flat, miners will be in an equilibrium where mining revenue is too slim, and they will probably have to sell most of their btc earnings to survive for the long run.
I mean if miners are able to pay expenses without selling BTC, for many reasons - previous profit, money from other assets they have, etc. and they have a choice, then they may choose to not sell BTC if they think its a better asset to own than cash, or other assets
.
True, but that's a lot of maybes, they could buy more mining gears, they could buy gold, or of course, hold
BTC, what I think that at least the majority of large miners in China sell most of their mined BTC to hedge their funds, remember that investing in mining gears, is somehow investing in bitcoin itself, your profitability depends greatly on BTC's price and existence in the first place, if things go south, you lose everything, wise investors usually know how to hedge their wealth.