Pages:
Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 15. (Read 5352633 times)

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Whats the difference between CKpool and Kano.is? They seem totally different but i always seem them together.
Kano.is is the one that exists, this is KanoPool that's been running since 2014, not the other pool that shut down.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Whats the difference between CKpool and Kano.is? They seem totally different but i always seem them together.
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Anyone who was mining on the pool with an apollo, it's blocked from mining PPLNS - only allowed mining Solo.
As mentioned in their thread, they've not bothered to do proper block level testing, so they're relegated to Solo for now.


... and to be blunt, I've no idea why anyone would do that testing for them, since they've written the code, you'd expect they'd test it properly.
Reminds me of the SPLNS pool that lost a block at the start coz apparently everyone there agreed to test ck's untested code for him ... that failed on the first block found by the miners ... so they all got nothing for that.


Edit:
It would appear that someone has done some Solo testing for "them", but alas "they've" stated that they'll release a 32bit version which directly relates to one of issues that loses blocks.
So for the time being, it will stay as Solo only.

Edit2: the apollo doesn't do asicboost - which basically means it wastes 10% of it's hashing.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1221
thats so bad

the site must report accurate information no matter if they like the link or not

the pool is there but says API error and with number lower number when should be near 29



The stupid thing is, if you click on the link that says the API is missing, it takes you to the API page with the actual data on it they need.

I wonder if they are just hitting it too often, do you have a rate limit on that page kano?
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
can anyone advise a good one mining pool for newbies?
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 1
thats so bad

the site must report accurate information no matter if they like the link or not

the pool is there but says API error and with number lower number when should be near 29

legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin

i have mined in this pool since 2014.
I have sent these guys a message to add KANO pool but the api is missing
this is a good advertisment for the pool
can you fix this Kano.
Others (and myself) have given them the link that provides the hash rate and timestamp on multiple occasions, then it shows up there for a while, but it keeps disappearing off their site soon after.
No idea what the issue is, but is seems they don't like the link Tongue
jr. member
Activity: 96
Merit: 1
https://miningpoolstats.stream/bitcoin

i have mined in this pool since 2014.
I have sent these guys a message to add KANO pool but the api is missing
this is a good advertisment for the pool
can you fix this Kano.


member
Activity: 92
Merit: 12
However, i reposthis
...

I have no idea what that post was other than guessing that someone on the forum sent you a scam message.

Just ignore it.

I,ve just send you a PM

Thanks for cleaning this uo for me!

 Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
However, i reposthis
...

I have no idea what that post was other than guessing that someone on the forum sent you a scam message.

Just ignore it.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 2
Hi Mr Kano, it is feasible to use your pool, with an Antminer U3 and 2 USB ASIC from Bitfury, they give about 65Gh/s approx.

Best regards and thanks
While it is feasible, it would be somewhat pointless due to the high power it would use for the very tiny hash rate, as implied by the above post about how old they are.

To compare: e.g. a NewPac USB runs about that hash rate using only a few watts - and NewPacs use old S9 chips.

I understand, it is more like a "lottery" and experiment, than what can be obtained.
And with an Antminer S9 ... electricity cost 0.00€/kwh
I'm looking at websites like whattomine.com, and theoretically it gets about 4.7$/day (which is probably a little less...).

Thank you very much!
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
...
Thank you for the quick response!
I logged in and checked the section. If I got it right the rewards are not exactly 1/3 within the first 3 days but get closer to 1/3 the longer the miner continues to run (given the miner runs 8hours/day). I'll try to get the script running and see how it works over time. Am I allowed to post questions regarding the CGminer API on your Discord-channel?
Well I designed and wrote the API so I guess that should be OK Smiley
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Hi Mr Kano, it is feasible to use your pool, with an Antminer U3 and 2 USB ASIC from Bitfury, they give about 65Gh/s approx.

Best regards and thanks
While it is feasible, it would be somewhat pointless due to the high power it would use for the very tiny hash rate, as implied by the above post about how old they are.

To compare: e.g. a NewPac USB runs about that hash rate using only a few watts - and NewPacs use old S9 chips.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1719
Electrical engineer. Mining since 2014.
Hi Mr Kano, it is feasible to use your pool, with an Antminer U3 and 2 USB ASIC from Bitfury, they give about 65Gh/s approx.

Best regards and thanks

2014 called, they want that old miner back
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 13
Hello I'm new here and I'm interested to know if it does make sense to run my miner just for a few hours a day. I have written a small script that allows me to use excess energy form my pv-system as soon as the battery is charged. This means the miner would run occasionally and irregularly. Is this a problem for the pool? Cheers!
Well, when we find a block, your reward is based on all the work you have done in the previous 3 days.
So e.g. if you were mining 8 hours a day, you'd expect 1/3 the reward of someone mining 24 hours a day with the same hash rate.

However, it wont be exactly 1/3, it could be higher or lower.

Firstly, read Help->Rewards when you are logged in.
But the point is that the 'tank' maximum and minimum will vary due to the 8 hours on and 16 hours off.
So if we found the next block right at the end of your 8 hours on, your 'tank' would be at the maximum point, but it we found the next block right at the end of your 16 hours off, your 'tank' would be at the minimum point.
i.e. much higher variance due to the on/off mining.

Thank you for the quick response!
I logged in and checked the section. If I got it right the rewards are not exactly 1/3 within the first 3 days but get closer to 1/3 the longer the miner continues to run (given the miner runs 8hours/day). I'll try to get the script running and see how it works over time. Am I allowed to post questions regarding the CGminer API on your Discord-channel?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 2
Hi Mr Kano, it is feasible to use your pool, with an Antminer U3 and 2 USB ASIC from Bitfury, they give about 65Gh/s approx.

Best regards and thanks
legendary
Activity: 4634
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Hello I'm new here and I'm interested to know if it does make sense to run my miner just for a few hours a day. I have written a small script that allows me to use excess energy form my pv-system as soon as the battery is charged. This means the miner would run occasionally and irregularly. Is this a problem for the pool? Cheers!
Well, when we find a block, your reward is based on all the work you have done in the previous 3 days.
So e.g. if you were mining 8 hours a day, you'd expect 1/3 the reward of someone mining 24 hours a day with the same hash rate.

However, it wont be exactly 1/3, it could be higher or lower.

Firstly, read Help->Rewards when you are logged in.
But the point is that the 'tank' maximum and minimum will vary due to the 8 hours on and 16 hours off.
So if we found the next block right at the end of your 8 hours on, your 'tank' would be at the maximum point, but it we found the next block right at the end of your 16 hours off, your 'tank' would be at the minimum point.
i.e. much higher variance due to the on/off mining.
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 13
Hello I'm new here and I'm interested to know if it does make sense to run my miner just for a few hours a day. I have written a small script that allows me to use excess energy form my pv-system as soon as the battery is charged. This means the miner would run occasionally and irregularly. Is this a problem for the pool? Cheers!
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
I was close-ish...lol.  I was figuring it correctly, that was just a rough off the cuff number I came up with, based on comparison time frames and hash rates.

At least you showed me my method was sound as long as a person understands the sliding scales involved. Like you implied, it's more of a range that one can predict with any degree of confidence.

Thank you Kano, I'm honored you answered personally!

As a network engineer I salute you for your SLA numbers, especially uptime, and performance.

I hope we hit one before it gets too warm in Western New York.

I usually have to quit mining around end of May or risk frying some boards.

Best, Mark
Pages:
Jump to: