Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 2. (Read 6981 times)
It is good news that the bounty campaign start using the KYC which will reduce someone for doing cheating.
The investor he doesn't complain KYC and does not bother with it, but bounty hunters constantly complain 
Because bounty hunters don't need to give credentials, 99% ico are not regulated, and 99% of these 99% which are not regulated are scams. I always research important things about ICO before I join bounty and I always hope project is legit but KYC will push me away from ICO, investing and bounty. I don't feel comfortable to share my personal data with strangers. Bounty managers should do KYC, escrow funds and send tokens to participants without KYC.
The investor he doesn't complain KYC and does not bother with it, but bounty hunters constantly complain
That could be a way to limit a hunter to make many fake accounts, which is a good development
Except KYC is not to identify fake accounts, it is used to identify investors who are investing larger amounts of money. KYC shouldn't be asked investors who are investing money under certain limits, especially for those who are investing 100$. Why KYC for low amounts? Imagine this, waitress asking you your ID's because you have spent 100$ in a bar.
I think it's good.Because spam will be reduced through the KYC.Had been more spam before.Now everyone is being warned because of the KYC.But the bad effect of the kyc is, whether our information keeps them safe!!!
The worst thing is that bounty participants didn't know that KYC is mandatory when they participating campaign . Usually devs tell this right after the campaigns ends. For me it's looks like a some kind of scam , because a lot of participants will pass KYC and thus will not get paid for their work . Is there a way to stop it ?
All ICO investors now have to do KYC verification, and I think the bounty hunter should not worry about it.
This is not a good trend.Crypto-currencies should be anonymous! Of course, if the project is very good, and you are confident in it, then I think that the kyc can be passed.
KYC is very important so that all the memebers and the investors should totally know by know their identity if they are didicated to the campagin or not. Also, it gives big help to the bounty managers to gain trust to those members of the group since there are many scammers around here in bitcoin community.
KYC is a okay for me as bounty hunter. Because it was lessen those people want to join with many accounts. But in other side, it will be burden for those participants if they have no valid id. which may affect the distribution process for them.
Know Your Costumer for bounty hunters are okay, as long as they required it at the very start of the bounty program or it was stated in the rules that all bounty hunters my comply to do KYC as the end of the ICO.
im okay with it. for me the kyc is just like a verification and i think they want all bounty hunters who join their project to do the kyc is because its just their way to deal with the multi-account cheaters.
I think there is no problem so far for token distribution done using KYC, maybe this is one bounty manager style because not all managers apply such a system as well as possible with KYC system to be its own value for managers to get more work and get the recommended status.
Ok if an ICO wants to make KYC procedure for all investors.
I think if the amount is small, then bounty members do not need to undergo a KYC procedure
I'm not optimistic about KYC's validation of the bounty thread. Because the bounty will not give you a lot of token, I think most people will give up the bounty when it requires KYC validation. So far this is not mentioned from the very beginning, then it is not fair, or better described as fraud. This is one of the reasons why some people insist that ICOs should be regulated.
That could be a way to limit a hunter to make many fake accounts, which is a good development
I don't really respect these campaigns. this is especially true of cheating on the part of developers. many people want to remain anonymous, but when you have been driving a bounty for several months, it is very unpleasant when they introduce the KYC procedure.
Nothing good can come of it. Because there is no law regulating the output of new ICO projects.
There is so much scam now and personally I do not want to trust my data to some third parties.
It is possible that after the company disappears I will meet a copy of my documents on the black market.
Sincerely yours.
There is so much scam now and personally I do not want to trust my data to some third parties.
It is possible that after the company disappears I will meet a copy of my documents on the black market.
Sincerely yours.
This is very risky because When we complete KYC for all Bounties our personal details will public and it is very dangerous because they can use our personal data to some other works, This is introduced because of more bounty hunters doing multiple acc this is some kind of control multiple account but this is not a good way for that 
The kyc procedure caused a lot of disagreement. On the one hand you need to fight with bots. On the other hand, for example, I do not want to upload my documents somewhere.
On the one hand I think it is quite dangerous to send your documents to so many teams and individuals. I try to send only when I kind of trust the project. Whereas, there are so many people who are trying to scam, trick and manipulate the bounty system. From that aspect I think it is quite nice to sort these people out by asking for KYC.
I think a solution would be when big projects overtake this identity and trust network on blockchain such as Ontology, The Key, Selfkey perhaps in order to give both sides, investors and projects, more trust.
I think a solution would be when big projects overtake this identity and trust network on blockchain such as Ontology, The Key, Selfkey perhaps in order to give both sides, investors and projects, more trust.
Jump to: