Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 7. (Read 7013 times)
It is very unreasonable to require bounty hunters to provide KYC. Why do these people want to do this? Bounty hunters advertise for these projects through their own efforts. They do not participate in ICO, nor should they provide KYC. At least I will not provide KYC to any team because it is actually not safe. These are my private information. I do not want to reveal to strangers I have never seen.
This is the decision of the company. They can do anything. They dictate the conditions. And you can agree or refuse. No one forces anyone to participate in his campaign. And this is normal. I do not see anything wrong with that. On the contrary, many alternative accounts are deleted.
I think this is good for preventing the occurrence of bounty cheats such as multi accounts, and also KYC is very helpful to collect valid participant data, and make bounty participants not only silent waiting when it has completed its task, but is required to continue to monitor the progress of the project 
I think KYC is applied as part of cryptocurrency and investment regulations in some countries
a new rule imposed by a project and I think it will make it difficult for gift campaign participants to join this project because I do not think all campaigns require KYC.
a new rule imposed by a project and I think it will make it difficult for gift campaign participants to join this project because I do not think all campaigns require KYC.
If only for bounty do not need KYC. If it's for Crowdsale it does not matter. If just for the requirements of receiving the award is not necessary because we only do bounty limited to signature and social media. not using money or investing.
I express my protest against these KYC for bounty hunters, because I just do not understand why they are needed. After all, bounty hunters do not actually pay any money to developers. Therefore, most likely the developers introduce this process, only because they did not understand themselves.
I don't like the idea of KYC myself, but many people use multiple accounts, so KYC helps to prevent that. It prevents cheaters to abuse the campaigns. I think it is a necessary evil.
I do not understand how you can publish personal data for a small amount of money, if you are tired of living peacefully, then probably it is really worth it, but if in the end you still get only a bunch of problems from your deed, then you only have to blame yourself.
I always thought that cryptocurrency it's anonymous sector and I don't need to show information about me
I used to support Kyc for bounty hunters. But not now, 3/3 of the bounty campaign I participated in has failed ... (or scam) and I do not support kyc
I don't really like the idea of bounty hunters doing a kyc for them to receive their reward, i even hate it more when they did not inform bounty hunters ahead of the start of the bounty, but when bounty ends they will say do kyc, that one is even worse. Wish we can come together and say No to all that.
for me the KYC is a good thing, with the help of this KYC the bounty managers will be able to know and disqualify those who are participating with multiple account in that particular bounty campaign. what most people are doing now is to use different bitcoin talk account to participate in one signature. and by doing so coursing confusion for the people who are managing the bounty.
KYC for bounty hunters today it sounds very stupid, because they did KYC for other purposes, why do people need your documents? Do not you think about it? I think that this procedure has a very deep continuation in the future.
I do not fully support grant programs that require hunters to conduct KYCs, as these are inconsistent with the crypto principle of decentralization, and for the security of hunters because their data can be compromised. And this is cheating
it is best to invest in a crypto project Socratus
My choosen campaigns normally are worth if the team appears strong so the profits are worth the number of posts of the campaign period.
Actually if you think it's not a good thing as scammers may get away with our kyc documents on the other hand legitimate projects will do this for compliance.
This is an unsafe procedure that entails simply attempting to seize confidential data. in general, it is designed only to combat money laundering, and the bounty hunters have nothing to launder, because they do not invest their money, but on the contrary - are engaged in promotion and advertising startup.
they have the freedom to change the terms and I think it's hurting the campaign participants and I think the data may be misused. better if the reason for giving kyc is not strong don't do. but if you believe if they will not use for bad thing please do.
Agreed. The KYC process is mandatory now a days but there are projects which relaxes KYC for bounty hunters and made KYC as mandatory only for purchasers. I think we need to be cautious while giving our data for KYC and all the projects is not true to save our data confidentially and there is a chance for misusing our data. We need to do our due diligence before producing our data to such projects in bounty programs.
I do not see anything terrible in this procedure. If necessary, I am always ready to provide my personal information.
Jump to: