Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 4. (Read 7013 times)
I have never passed KYC, but if asked, it should be at least a top-level Binance exchange. ICO with KYC is quite a promising business, but at the same time it's aspiring, because 90% of the scams or at least will work exclusively at the auction of the released token.
I was very saddened tendency enter in the bounty of the KYC procedure. Unfortunately, I have several times faced with it - and very dreary to undergo this procedure, and give your personal data in the unknown
Asking for Kyc from bounty hunters by bounty programs is a good thing. The bounty programmers should even make it compulsory or every bounty hunter to provide their Kyc which will reveal that they are humans but not robots
Seriously i do not see any need asking for bounty hunters to carry out KYC exercise after the project to gain more awareness, the inception from bounty managers most times as related to KYC is not suitable for most hunters as for me i do not participate in any bounty that requires for KYC my data is more important to me than the bounty as you can not trust bounty managers with your personal information which might be linked if not now but much more later. Though there are some that there cool, yet i still don't find it as a necessity.
I think that the development of KYC will have a bad impact on the cryptocurrency
I recently began to notice more frequently the requirement for KYC for bounty hunters. It is inevitable that development and Hunter community have no choice but to accept new realities.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
[/quote
No I'm not in favor of KYC , I don't understand why it need to have kyc just to claim your tokens in an ICO, if the purpose is to avoid multiple account , then just find another way of pulling out multiple acount . I hope that bounty managers will understand on this situation and not requiring kyc at the end.
[/quote
No I'm not in favor of KYC , I don't understand why it need to have kyc just to claim your tokens in an ICO, if the purpose is to avoid multiple account , then just find another way of pulling out multiple acount . I hope that bounty managers will understand on this situation and not requiring kyc at the end.
I don't like this option very much , but if the project is very promising in my opinion, I will pass this procedure. Unfortunately, I think this will be a must for most projects soon
They fight with multiaccounts, I think it makes sense. If you are not a cheater, you have nothing to fear.
If we as bounty hunters have to do KYC, which is very annoying, it might be a good idea to block multiple accounts,
But I don't like people holding my personal information.
But I don't like people holding my personal information.
I think this is totally superfluous, if an abundance string at first specify KYC data to be submitted, so I figure I won't go to this abundance strings, if toward the finish of the ICO, so only for accommodation KYC data, at that point this is extortion and is fundamentally the same as.
bounty is not so interesting for me ad j do not believe in it and itseemdps to be just a matter of lucj for me Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
i am no fan of bounty programms and have never been one of them, so i do not really care, honestly about those news
I think this is totally superfluous, if an abundance string at first specify KYC data to be submitted, so I figure I won't go to this abundance strings, if toward the finish of the ICO, so only for accommodation KYC data, at that point this is extortion and is fundamentally the same as.
It's good that now in many projects warn about the passage of KYC and I can choose to join this project or not. I pass KYC if I like the project, but I certainly do not like it.
As of gladius and INS token approached to fill KYS for their abundance for me . I think its great if your extremely a certifiable member and it might sting for the bot account trick account they simply demolishing abundance framework . I think more ICO's Should concocting controls. Its a solid move.
I have a development KYC causes dissatisfaction, because the whole system is built on cryptocurrency anonymity collapses.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think it's legit to do thatjust like ICOs, they all requested KYC, so people are planting to cheat would think again. cause it's much harder.
it's a bit annoying for us, but it's worth to do for a better market.
if using KYC I think it is very painful, most of the current bounty campaign program does not say the KYC problem from the beginning of the gift, and this is what makes bounty hunter disappointed.
I think that this is quite a normal and correct procedure . it is mandatory for many, and it helps to get rid of multi-accounts
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think it's dumb. KYC is only needed when people invest money, that's the whole point. It's like these airdrops doing KYC (I've seen it), absolutely ridiculous
Recently, more and more campaigns require KYC. Sometimes this is announced at the end, when you need to get a reward. And there's nothing to be done.
I believe that kyc is a very important part of bounty campaign, because it allows to find and exclude the abusers and cheaters who have a "trillion" bitcointalk accounts. Jump to: