Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 10. (Read 7013 times)
I think it will help to exclude multi-accounts. Yes, maybe it is not safe but you will know that you are participating without the cheaters.
I know KYC is important to avoid spammer, and false account, you can easily make thousands of false account, to get an easy bounty, if there are no KYC, than Spammer/hacker get his money, but when KYC, spammer/hacker doesn't get anything, because he cannot give thousands of ID cards.
But I don't love giving my ID card to unknown person... I can be dangerous. (identity thief?)
What's do you think?
But I don't love giving my ID card to unknown person... I can be dangerous. (identity thief?)
What's do you think?
Of course sometimes it strains especially when you do not take your documents but for safety it's a plus
Checking KYC security for participants of the generosity campaign ICO does not add anything. ICO fraudulent teams can also conduct a KYC review and conduct it, and then escape not only with the money collected from investors, but also with all the collected identification data of investors and bounty hunters. To whom does this add security? On the one hand, it's really bad that bounty participants are forced to provide personal data to get tokens. It is not clear what they will do with this data and in what hands they can get. There have been numerous cases when the base documents of the participants of the bounty and investors fell into the wrong hands. On the other hand, such a test will help project developers to understand who they are dealing with. Whether they are actually sending tokens to a person or whether a bot has been registered instead.
in any case, the provision of personal data by hunters for bounty is not determined by anything. The fact is that there is a huge risk of making yourself a problem when to provide such information to a foreign party.
This is to avoid the multi entry, this is good for the projects to distribute there rewards equally but for hunters it is not good. But this kind of projects that requires a KYC is most like a good project so its all worth it.
It's just an excuse for the campaign managers to avoid paying all the bounty hunters.
Well, I did a lot of bounties, but until now nobody asked my papers.
I would be a very bad habit...
I would be a very bad habit...
I think that this is a bad development. because I don't want to risk my data being used by scammers.
Yes, I am totally agree with you. I am very worry about security of my data and ICO for me completely untrustable in such situation.
Suppose this is a good exclusion method with multiple accounts. Someone does not want to leave their data to someone unknown. But this is an unfair game, when announced the need to pass KYC is at the end or after the end of the campaign.
Then join campaign where you won't need to pass kyc. All managers have telegram groups or you can contact them trough PM and ask them if ico team is going to ask you kyc, they should know it. I hate changing rules after bounty ends.
It is a requirement too high for what bounty hunters can get from their bounty. I think there should be rules as if some bounty hunter can make more than $1000, so they need to be KYC 
I think that this is a bad development. because I don't want to risk my data being used by scammers.
Suppose this is a good exclusion method with multiple accounts. Someone does not want to leave their data to someone unknown. But this is an unfair game, when announced the need to pass KYC is at the end or after the end of the campaign.
Though is not suppose to be like that but I think they are using kyc method to shortlist those that are using multiple account and also to protect another person from claiming what does not belong to them. In other way round, the bounty Creator have forgotten that if someone information get leak and used for wrong thing, it can damage d reputation of such person.
On the one hand, it's really bad that bounty participants are forced to provide personal data to get tokens. It is not clear what they will do with this data and in what hands they can get. There have been numerous cases when the base documents of the participants of the bounty and investors fell into the wrong hands. On the other hand, such a test will help project developers to understand who they are dealing with. Whether they are actually sending tokens to a person or whether a bot has been registered instead.
in any case, the provision of personal data by hunters for bounty is not determined by anything. The fact is that there is a huge risk of making yourself a problem when to provide such information to a foreign party. 
On the one hand, it's really bad that bounty participants are forced to provide personal data to get tokens. It is not clear what they will do with this data and in what hands they can get. There have been numerous cases when the base documents of the participants of the bounty and investors fell into the wrong hands. On the other hand, such a test will help project developers to understand who they are dealing with. Whether they are actually sending tokens to a person or whether a bot has been registered instead.
I strongly disagree with bounty that asks bounty participants to do KYC because bounty participants do not make any investment, just help to promote a bounty, we also do not know what they will keep our ID safely 
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I could never understand why projects make bounty hunters to pass KYC. In my opinion, it is the most unnecessary practice - participants of the campaign are just promoting the project.
It's the same as if you outsourced advertising to a third party company and asked its employees to provide their identification documents.
Doesn't that sound ridiculous?
To be honest I never agreed about KYC for bounty hunter because us as a bounty hunter is not buy the tokens and not invest on the ICO but to prevent multiple account and cheaters on bounties, I will agree KYC for bounty hunters. Make cheaters die.
I completely agree. The КУC is simply necessary to get rid of multi-users, which often do not give any possibility to compete with them. Crypto should be honest and transparent.
I think KYC procedure for bounty participants only to delay the distribution of the token rewards.
As a bounty participant, we should against this thing.
As a bounty participant, we should against this thing.
The procedure KYC contradicts the crypto-currencies we need to stay anonymous after all we will be unaware of what might happen in case our identities were used. Lots of good projects do not require kyc, should stick to those instead.
Jump to: