i don't like the idea of KYC is implemented to join bounty and would avoid those if possible.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 6. (Read 6981 times)
Asking for Kyc from bounty hunters by bounty programs is a good thing. The bounty programmers should even make it compulsory or every bounty hunter to provide their Kyc which will reveal that they are humans but not robots
Making KYC mandatory for bounty hunters is not a good trend. They should limit that to buyers/investors only. Some campaigns are keeping bounty hunters out of KYC and I think they actually know what they are doing.
There should not be that much of a problem with the KYC procedure if you have the information. I am against the KYC rules even though they could use it for the good. Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
This is a really bad precedent set by some bounty managers, and people are selling/offering their IDs for few bucks tokes.
I don't care for it and will never like it, a few coins are over in under multi year thus goes your data, they will dispatch another ICO and since they have their data they can simply spam you or surprisingly more terrible they can pitch this to the outsider, individuals burn through a large number of dollars just to ensure their protection, don't lose it for your a couple of pennies.
the anti money laundering process has always caused controversy, for people who are too worried about their data, it is better not to enter the crypto world because the crypto world is in need of transparency.
Making KYC mandatory for bounty hunters is not a good trend. They should limit that to buyers/investors only. Some campaigns are keeping bounty hunters out of KYC and I think they actually know what they are doing.
I don't care for it and will never like it, a few coins are over in under multi year thus goes your data, they will dispatch another ICO and since they have their data they can simply spam you or surprisingly more terrible they can pitch this to the outsider, individuals burn through a large number of dollars just to ensure their protection, don't lose it for your a couple of pennies.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
At first I felt a little bit objected to the policy but after realizing that there was a lot of cheating by the bounty hunters as using multiple accounts it made me realize that KYC is really needed to minimize cheating again and that is very profitable because the allocation for bounty is not shared with the person wrong
Is a wrong move any ICO will consider asking for Know your client before issuing tokens. In the event that such a run is actualized then a couple will take an interest in abundance campaing. Since , I can confide in my character to a more abnormal looking for reserves for an undertaking that hasnt got live. Imagine a scenario where I ended up in the first page of a daily paper tomorrow that I am owing an online bank.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
This could be a measure employed to checkmate the use of multiple accounts which is very prevalent in airdrop and bounty programs but I won't give out my personal information to any airdrop or bounty scheme.
Well, I think this is done in order to try to protect yourself from multi-accounts.
KYC is a very good invention, it allows you to get rid of dishonest participants using multiple accounts.
I do not agree with KYC because it can use my personal information on illegal activities. So we should be careful about our documenting documents because our lives and safety depend on it. KYC should be removed!
For bounty hunters why required KYC I can't understand.Because they are doing work for promoting project.They are not customer.But kyc is important for any company for know about their customer. I think bounty payment is project share for this reason bounty Hunters also need kyc.But I think need to declare first about kyc in bounty if needed.
It is not necessary for bounty hunters to do KYC. It might make some people not to participate in such bounties. Not everyone is comfortable giving out his personal details online when you don't even have idea of the project owners.
The feature of the crypto currency is to be anonymous. I do not think KYC practice is right. We do not know where this information will be used. I had to do KYC for a few bounty. I made it mandatory.I think that their team is reliable. That's why I sent it. I hope I do not have a problem.
A way must be find out. For 2-5 $ bounty i will never send my ID verification. I can understand they need to get rid of there are a lot of fake accounts but phone verification can solve this very easy way.
I have a negative attitude to the fact that Bounty companies are beginning to require the passage of KYC.
I like the idea with the KYC identification for bounty campaign participants, it allows you to get rid of multi-accounts and increase the amount of payment for bona fide participants.
In the current situation for the ICO, it is better to conduct KYC than not to conduct it.
1. The project will protect itself from the ambiguity of the law requirements
2. The project can save some tokens, because not everyone will want to pass KYC.
1. The project will protect itself from the ambiguity of the law requirements
2. The project can save some tokens, because not everyone will want to pass KYC.
Jump to: