THEN there will be sobbing threads here.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 8. (Read 6981 times)
As I've already stated, I don't like at all this KYC for bounty hunters stuff. However, just wait that for reasons of bullshit national security of guess who at some point the KYC will be suddenly mandatory worldwide for owning any wallet of any cryptocurrency, or else..
THEN there will be sobbing threads here.
THEN there will be sobbing threads here.
they have the freedom to change the terms and I think it's hurting the campaign participants and I think the data may be misused. better if the reason for giving kyc is not strong don't do. but if you believe if they will not use for bad thing please do.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think it is absolutely necessary and a very important measure. If we think that some individuals are seriously announcing a prize with multi membership, this method is a step in the way. Obviously, greedy people will succeed in overcoming this stage, but it can still be used as a successful measure. Another positive aspect is that the project team knows their investors and how much they are interested in.
Companies that ask for KYC information from service providers such as bounty hunters are probably wanting to scam them out. There is no reason to ask for KYC info in this case other than that.
They should announce the existence of this procedure at the very beginning ... I think it would be more correct.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Not a problem at all. As soon as you send your passport in Internet it will be available worldwide. All that fairy tales of security and locked stocks for kids.
So if ICO management wants to impress the investors they demand it but indeed it means nothing. We just better because we have KYC.
I think this procedure is dangerous and useless, because they say that your data can be used by third parties. although on the other hand, project developers are reinsured to know those with whom they work. Similar procedures appeared when the number of scams increased.
I think certain types of KYC are great on account of the plenty of con artists that are coming into the bounties. The con artists are demolishing the bounties and making it harder for the dedicated and genuine people to get what's coming to them for their work rendered, so in a few impacts the KYC regards get rid of the greater part of the con artists who are taking everybody Else'sbread and margarine. On the off chance that being supposed unknown gives you the privilege to take and cheat, at that point anon isn't great. We have benefits in this world yet in addition duties and taking frm others isn't anybody's correct. Obviously the kyc has got the opportunity to be logicl also and not for them to request an excessive number of things to make it unwieldy.
This is the decision of the company. They can do anything. They dictate the conditions. And you can agree or refuse. No one forces anyone to participate in his campaign. And this is normal. I do not see anything wrong with that. On the contrary, many alternative accounts are deleted.
I don't think it is necessary to provide your documents for bounty rewards. Lately first thing I check in bounty is kyc and if there is kyc rule i look for another bounty and after that I take closer look at project. I don't see any harm in doing kyc
You will see harm when you give your data to scammers and they use your data to scam. Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I am not in full support of bounty programs asking bounty hunters to do KYC , because this not in consonant with the crypto principle of decentralization, and for the security of bounty hunters because their data could be compromised.
Kyc is really a good thing. But, As much as I do not like this, although, I do understand the idea behind it, as many individuals out there are using multiple accounts when applying, so this would only be eliminates through or by doing kyc.
There are another perfect methods to protect project from multiple account participation. For example making more strict conditions, not 10 messages but 40, or 10 but they should be like conversation, not one time post and etc. And there is no need to identify personal data of btt user
some ICO projects want KYC validation later
they have to say that from the beginning.
I don't see any harm in doing kyc
they have to say that from the beginning.
I don't see any harm in doing kyc
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Personally I think this is a good thing. Because there is a lot of people out there that try to cheat by making multiple accounts. And with KYC they can somehow regulate bounty campaigns and members that try to cheat. Also I think it is also good to announce KYC right after bounty campaigns has ended that way, someone who cheats invests his time and end up with nothing, and probably it won't do it again.
In my opinion KYC is not a problem the problem is after doing kyc what next. We don't know what will happen to our identity in the future maybe it will be use by other person in order to have something to gain from other. KYC must be announce at the beginning and not at the end because it is clear corruption in a simple action.
I think it is not bad. Of course we should sort scam projects, but real good projects should sort participants from bots and scammers... I think it is good for crypto... Our community will be much more healthier...
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I believe that this is normal, and it should be so. This measure reduces the number of people who use multiaccounts. 
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I haven't done any KYC on bounty program I've participated and I hope it will not happen to me, undergoing KYC because I am not planning to do KYC I know how the business of selling accounts in the dark web works, and I don't want my credentials to be a part of it.
For me, the practise is a good step in the right direction. it reduces the possibility of multiple accounts being used and it also protects the ICO in terms of legality. From my understanding it's a bit of a grey area legally because bounty hunters are not investors so shouldn't technically need to give up their info, I think many ICOs now are just doing it to be extra safe.
I myself have not been satisfied with the KYC request too often, and most importantly, where will these documents go?
I really don't understand that there are people who think that ask for the KYC is guarantee that the project is honest and confiable, or that will avoid multiple accounts. Is it that a scam project can not ask the KYC to investors? Is it that a bounty hunter can not use the ID of family members, friends or another methods
Jump to: