Pages:
Author

Topic: ► ❎ ► LEALANA PHYSICAL LITECOINS FOR SALE - RESUMING SALES!!! - page 8. (Read 133698 times)

legendary
Activity: 1272
Merit: 1012
howdy
Just a heads up for those buying from a third party:



Be sure this doesn't happen to you.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
July 20th, 2014: Auction for ONE LEALANA 25 LTC 1 Troy oz 999 Silver Litecoin

****THIS IS THE ONE OF THE LAST FOUR OF THESE COINS I WILL BE AUCTIONING.*****

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/9-auction-for-one-lealana-25-ltc-1-troy-oz-999-silver-litecoin-1of4-left-702781
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Posted an auction for TWELVE 0.1 BTC 1/4 oz .999 fine silver Lealana Bitcoins:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7903375
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Last auction for series #1 ONE LTC Lealana Brass coins for now:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7884105
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I've posted an auction for FOUR rolls of 0.1 BTC brass Lealana Bitcoins:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/6-fast-auction-6-for-4-rolls-of-20-2013-lealana-01-btc-brass-coins-696455

Individual roll bids are welcome.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Posted an auction for TWENTY 1 LTC LEALANA Brass Coins (SERIES #1):

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7796938
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Posted an auction for one of each of the following:

LEALANA LITECOINS
1 oz 999 Fine Silver 25 LTC
1/2 oz 999 Fine Silver 10 LTC (batch #2)
1/4 oz 999 Fine SIlver 5 LTC
1 LTC Brass

LEALANA BITCOINS
1 oz 999 Fine Silver - Gold plated 1 BTC
1 oz 999 Fine Silver 0.5 BTC
1/2 oz 999 Fine SIlver 0.25 BTC
1/4 oz 999 FIne Silver 0.1 BTC
0.1 BTC Brass


Note: One of the few 1 oz 25 LTC coins is a part of this auction that I have left.

LINK: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7573786
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I put up an auction for a 25 LTC 1 oz 999 Fine Silver Lealana Litecoin 2013 series.

I have stopped selling these months ago, but am auctioning one of the few I have kept for myself to the highest bidder.

Get them while you can. Smiley


LINK: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/auction-for-one-lealana-25-ltc-1-troy-oz-999-silver-litecoin-auction-6-658830
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

This is something for me to definitely consider and get clarity about.
vip
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
Edit: It isn't impossible because what is to stop the person being checked for their ID from sending the payment address they received via registered mail to another person to pay for them? This doesn't solve the issue entirely as it is just another iteration of registered mail that is unnecessary. Or am I missing something here?

I dunno.  It seems like you'd be safer.  You're not enabling someone to do something they can't already do, and you have a good sense of the identity of who paid and who got the coins.  You didn't enable someone to move money from point A to B any more than they could have.  I don't really know the best way to explain it, but I have a hunch that my attorney would probably concede the overall risk in doing this was less but non zero, for lots of little itty bitty reasons, the largest of which could be that he might get FinCEN on the phone and simply ask them and hear them say "yeah we don't consider that to be money transmitting".

Ultimately at the end of the day, the actual risk is a function of how much you bother people who have the power to regulate money into doing something about it.  It could very well be that selling physical bitcoins was never money transmitting to begin with, but challenging FinCEN's opinion would be unduly costly (not to mention it's an opinion likely to evolve over time on its own anyway as Bitcoin becomes more widely understood)
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I posted an auction here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6822180

for the first assembled 0.1 BTC brass coins. They have the lowest numbered holograms on them.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
This is one idea I have thought of if I were to resume sales:

Instead of saying please pay such and such Bitcoin address on the web form, send the Bitcoin address via postal mail with restricted delivery to the individual name on the order. They have to show id to pick up the letter.

When they pay, ship only to the same name and address, also restricted delivery.

A lot of the discussion I had with my legal counsel is that part of what makes it money transmitting is there is no way for me to know whether the person ordering is the person receiving. In other words it is money transmitting because each order "could" be a money transmission with no way to know. Restricted delivery changes that aspect of the story.

Afaik it is not money transmitting if the money can only go from person A at place X, to person A at same place X. As I understood the definition the service must move the money to a different person or place and this makes it all but impossible.

Not legal advice, am not a lawyer

Much of my previous orders used registered restricted delivery. This is something I am going to be using for shipping purposes.

Essentially I am now selling metal coins with holograms on them that buyers fund themselves. Much like selling empty gift cards, if an analogy were to be used.

I see what you are saying concerning matching up a person to an address.

Edit: It isn't impossible because what is to stop the person being checked for their ID from sending the payment address they received via registered mail to another person to pay for them? This doesn't solve the issue entirely as it is just another iteration of registered mail that is unnecessary. Or am I missing something here?
vip
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1136
The Casascius 1oz 10BTC Silver Round (w/ Gold B)
This is one idea I have thought of if I were to resume sales:

Instead of saying please pay such and such Bitcoin address on the web form, send the Bitcoin address via postal mail with restricted delivery to the individual name on the order. They have to show id to pick up the letter.

When they pay, ship only to the same name and address, also restricted delivery.

A lot of the discussion I had with my legal counsel is that part of what makes it money transmitting is there is no way for me to know whether the person ordering is the person receiving. In other words it is money transmitting because each order "could" be a money transmission with no way to know. Restricted delivery changes that aspect of the story.

Afaik it is not money transmitting if the money can only go from person A at place X, to person A at same place X. As I understood the definition the service must move the money to a different person or place and this makes it all but impossible.

Not legal advice, am not a lawyer
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
I'm happy that you're selling again, but at the same time I'm glad I bought mine before they all became self-funded.  Good luck with your future sales!

Thanks for that! Aloha!  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 315
Merit: 250
I'm happy that you're selling again, but at the same time I'm glad I bought mine before they all became self-funded.  Good luck with your future sales!
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
Oh snap, son! Do you have any of the first run error 10 LTC coins left?
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
Pages:
Jump to: