These are the policies for a 2017 campaign.
Then don't you think you should lead off with that? Or even just include it?Nope, this thread isn't about the Collin County campaign, it's about the philosophy "Let the machines do the work".
Topic: Let the Machines do the Work (The end of Slavery) - page 6. (Read 18320 times)
Nope, this thread isn't about the Collin County campaign, it's about the philosophy "Let the machines do the work".
Especially when you lead off with a lot of bitching, pissing, and moaning about how old and christian the community is.
I didn't piss an moan, I mentioned once that they WERE. Otherwise you wouldn't have even known about that section of the population.
You are just willfully dense, even as someone blatantly educates you :lol:
These are the policies for a 2017 campaign.
Then don't you think you should lead off with that? Or even just include it?Nope, this thread isn't about the Collin County campaign, it's about the philosophy "Let the machines do the work".
These are the policies for a 2017 campaign.
Then don't you think you should lead off with that? Or even just include it?Because if you don't say that, preferably at the start, the reader is inevitably going to take it exactly the way I did. Especially when you lead off with a lot of bitching, pissing, and moaning about how old and christian the community is.
An it DOES NOT center around bitcoin mining. Even the original philosophy of "let the machines do the work" is not primarily about bitcoin. Bitcoin is just the part that starts the profiting from robots (since they are robots that make money), it is in no way the "center" it is simply a "piece".
Stone cold sober, chief. And the word "should" appears 41 times, making it the 14th most common word in that text. For reference, McKinney only appears 31 times, and people 34. (Bitcoin appears twice, and mining only 6 times.)
Of those instances of "should," by the way, 16 of them are "should be" (the second most common phrase in that text), 7 are "there should," and 4 are "should have."
The word "should" is because as you should remember, these are PLANS.
None of this stuff is in place, it is plans to expand what the town of McKinney already has in place.
WRONG. As I said before, that is YOUR fault for reading with that tone. That is not what was written.
These are the policies for a 2017 campaign.
Stone cold sober, chief. And the word "should" appears 41 times, making it the 14th most common word in that text. For reference, McKinney only appears 31 times, and people 34. (Bitcoin appears twice, and mining only 6 times.)
Of those instances of "should," by the way, 16 of them are "should be" (the second most common phrase in that text), 7 are "there should," and 4 are "should have."
The word "should" is because as you should remember, these are PLANS.
None of this stuff is in place, it is plans to expand what the town of McKinney already has in place.
Let me see if I understand what the argument is here.
1. We all get ASIC mining machines
2. We create lots of cryptocurrency coins
3. We're all rich from our cryptocurrency coins
4. We use all of our money to buy robots
5. Robots do all the work
Is that correct?
1. We all get ASIC mining machines
2. We create lots of cryptocurrency coins
3. We're all rich from our cryptocurrency coins
4. We use all of our money to buy robots
5. Robots do all the work
Is that correct?
No.
1 Yes
2 Yes
3 No, you are missing many points
4 No, you are missing many points
5 Almost, but not ALL the work
3 - what are the many points I am missing?
4 - what are the many points I am missing?
5 - I understand
2. (I know I didn't mention that you missed this one, but you did) We don't just make a bunch of coins, we also make uses for coins.
Ex: Make a coin for your town, make a coin for your Xbox Live clan, make a coin for your family and use it to teach your kids about finance.
3. We don't get rich from the coins, so not only did you miss points, you were just blatantly wrong in your guess. It just creates a system like the USD and Peso, but for smaller groups instead of countries, making it so that the group can exchange debt between one another. It has nothing to do with getting rich, just getting everyone on the same level. Or at least get everyone off the bottom level, so we can just hire immigrants and stop worrying about the border (I also have drug policies that could be beneficial to America).
I can continue if you would like, that is not all you missed.
4. We don't buy robots, companies & individual inventors specialize robots to fir their needs and humans continue to do do jobs robots can't do, like: Invent, be artistic, philosophize, repair robots, govern, act, organize groups, etc.
Stone cold sober, chief. And the word "should" appears 41 times, making it the 14th most common word in that text. For reference, McKinney only appears 31 times, and people 34. (Bitcoin appears twice, and mining only 6 times.)
Of those instances of "should," by the way, 16 of them are "should be" (the second most common phrase in that text), 7 are "there should," and 4 are "should have."
The word "should" is because as you should remember, these are PLANS.
None of this stuff is in place, it is plans to expand what the town of McKinney already has in place.
Please learn what context is before talking to me
Let me see if I understand what the argument is here.
1. We all get ASIC mining machines
2. We create lots of cryptocurrency coins
3. We're all rich from our cryptocurrency coins
4. We use all of our money to buy robots
5. Robots do all the work
Is that correct?
1. We all get ASIC mining machines
2. We create lots of cryptocurrency coins
3. We're all rich from our cryptocurrency coins
4. We use all of our money to buy robots
5. Robots do all the work
Is that correct?
No.
1 Yes
2 Yes
3 No, you are missing many points
4 No, you are missing many points
5 Almost, but not ALL the work
3 - what are the many points I am missing?
4 - what are the many points I am missing?
5 - I understand
Nevermind, Ctrl-F works just as well. So, to sum up:
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Nope, that's not even "basically" it.
That's not what it says it all. It sounds like you are reading it with a certain tone in mind, and that is what you are hearing instead of the actual words I have written.
The whole thing goes together, there is no "part" to trim out. It is a single article. If you don't want to read, wait till you are less drunk.
Of those instances of "should," by the way, 16 of them are "should be" (the second most common phrase in that text), 7 are "there should," and 4 are "should have."
Nevermind, Ctrl-F works just as well. So, to sum up:
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Nope, that's not even "basically" it.
That's not what it says it all. It sounds like you are reading it with a certain tone in mind, and that is what you are hearing instead of the actual words I have written.
The whole thing goes together, there is no "part" to trim out. It is a single article. If you don't want to read, wait till you are less drunk.
Nevermind, Ctrl-F works just as well. So, to sum up:
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Nope, that's not even "basically" it.
Nevermind, Ctrl-F works just as well. So, to sum up:
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Nope, that's not even "basically" it.
And there are parts where it is obvious mining machines would easily fit, even if it is not mentioned.
Nevermind, Ctrl-F works just as well. So, to sum up:
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Public services should run mining rigs to pay for themselves.
Really think that will work, chief?
Not a word of that is actually about bitcoin mining, is it? (I'm going to be honest, I stopped reading at "Crape Myrtle")
Yes it is.
If I just pull out the Bitcoin part, you won't understand how it all works in the community, and you will argue semantically, about only a section of what I wrote... So, I'd rather you just read the whole thing if you plan on replying with any relevance.
Not a word of that is actually about bitcoin mining, is it? (I'm going to be honest, I stopped reading at "Crape Myrtle")
Yes it is.
Not a word of that is actually about bitcoin mining, is it? (I'm going to be honest, I stopped reading at "Crape Myrtle")
Yes it is.
Not a word of that is actually about bitcoin mining, is it? (I'm going to be honest, I stopped reading at "Crape Myrtle")
Jump to: