We Need More Apps with Lightning, not More Lightning Apps
This is a very well-written article with an innovative thesis: we need more applications built with LN inside and not a better LN application.
The parallel is with digital cameras. Those objects were pretty good until 2007, it was the integration of a digital camera in the iPhone that was a game changer and allowed for a complete reinvention of the product. Not as per se, as before, but as an integrated layer on a bigger, more complex, product.
And this is key to shifting the lever to increase the usage of LN: not the ideology, but the utility. Utility, the ability to use something for a reason, is by far a more effective way of convincing someone to use something or orange-pilling as we speak of Bitcoin technologies.
Utility is the key to scale. Connections are the key to utility. Developers are the key to connections.
Who could have imagined Instagram back in 1974?
I bet no one can imagine how Bitcoin/Lightning will look like in 50 years from now...
Nostr is where this is happening currently.
First person to ping me on there who is "zappable" gets 1k sats.
npub1qktjyk0vdqlfss7wztawdnka5phx2p3vlvq50x0z402jk2fjhtnqlx9qas