have you ever tried to question your gods in a critique way, instead of pandering to their gospel
Have you ever attempted to actually answer us the ideal way of running Bitcoin? Without rising the block size limit every once in a while obviously, that isn't reasonable. The only thing I've been reading from you since my registration is "devs don't look that", "devs don't fix that", "devs shouldn't write that" etc.
Telling us what the fuck version of Bitcoin you've been running would be a nice start. We know it isn't Bitcoin Core as the Core developers are like, the Darth Vader of Bitcoin in your little head, and it isn't Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV either. So what the fuck are you running, kindly asking.
and has never published it. However, I have a strong suspicion that he's full of shit and doesn't want to admit that he's using Core. Or he's just an SPV user and will simply follow whatever consensus rules are set, despite how much he whines about them. He can barely read, so I very much doubt he can code well enough to build a stable client.
and its really time you look beyond your own scripts
Says the only person in the world with his own made-up phrases for established concepts, where he deliberately calls things by other names in a weak attempt to degrade their image.
Your script is to convert "layer 2" to "subnetwork".
Your script is to convert "offchain" to "other networks".
Your script is to convert an inclusive and eloquent soft fork into "bloat".
Have you ever stopped to notice that no one is adopting your make-believe language?
im not a bitcoin cash fan.
THAT is an "other network", yet
-you- -repeatedly- -argue- that BCH should be called "Bitcoin" and LN should be called "other network". You're the most disgusting person in the entire crypto-space. Far worse than Wright or Ver combined. Utterly contemptible.
