After BTC.com successfully launched a new brand a few months back, they've now moved their explorer to a new home as well: CloverPool [considering that there's little to no difference between the current explorer and the "last archive of the previous one", I think we should stick to 1miau's ratings for this one as well]
- While we're at it, we should also keep tabs on BitcoinExplorer and Txflow [both have been unreachable for a few days].
Topic: List of useful Bitcoin block explorers (Read 6386 times)
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Thank you very much!
The missing date should be
The missing date should be
Thank you as well
I don't know why no point to walletexplorer.com, though I found it to be among few only (if not single one) which list addresses by wallet's public key whether legacy, native segwit or nested segwit's with of course past transactions, balances, etc. Tell me if I am wrong
If you'd have read the comment added for that website, you could see that you risk having your IP tracked. You can read this post for understanding the decision regarding the rating of WalletExplorer.
sr. member
Activity: 714
Merit: 251
Learning here every day—thanks to everyone sharing
I don't know why no point to walletexplorer.com, though I found it to be among few only (if not single one) which list addresses by wallet's public key whether legacy, native segwit or nested segwit's with of course past transactions, balances, etc. Tell me if I am wrong
Thank you very much!
The missing date should be:
The missing date should be:
Quote
Yes (12/2023)
Since then, we've been displaying transaction information and indicating whether a transaction uses SegWit. We also highlight transactions with mixed inputs (some SegWit, some not) where applicable.legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
It's been over a month, so I'm raising this topic to remind about my project.
Thank you for this reminder, cloxy!
You are right, since a month passed and nobody objected, I added your website to OP and also to the old version of the table. I will update soon the Romanian version of OP as well but I need one more info from you: at the column "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**" you wrote only "Yes", without specifying also since when (month/year). Can you add this information as well, please, for having all the fields filled properly?
Thank you.
It's been over a month, so I'm raising this topic to remind about my project.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Thank you cloxy for submitting your proposal in the proper format. Let's wait a few days before adding the proposal, thus other members have time to express their oppinions too about this new explorer. If no objections will arise, I will add the website soon.
At same time, I was waiting an answer from cygan or bullrun2020 regarding the question posted by SFR10 about Arkham website -- how did you find that it supports SegWit addresses? Is it only for registered users...?
At same time, I was waiting an answer from cygan or bullrun2020 regarding the question posted by SFR10 about Arkham website -- how did you find that it supports SegWit addresses? Is it only for registered users...?
| Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating) Tongue *** | Works without JS? | Rated by |
| BitRef | Yes (04/2020) / Yes (11/2022) | Yes | 7 / 10 Points | No | cloxy |
I believe that should be it. I’m very grateful for your prompt reply. Thanks in advance!
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
You might consider adding BitRef.com to the list.
Thank you for the suggestion, cloxy! But I kindly ask you to use the format specified in OP. I mean this one:
Code:
[table]
[tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][url=http://xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx) / Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes / No[/b][/td]
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
[tr]
[td]Name (link)[/td]
[td]Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?[/td]
[td]SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?**[/td]
[td]Usefulness (subjective rating) :P ***[/td]
[td]Works without JS?[/td]
[td]Rated by[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]________________________[/td]
[td]________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]____________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td][url=http://xxx]xxx[/url][/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx) / Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td]Yes / No (xx/20xx)[/td]
[td][b][color=black]x / 10 Points[/color][/b][/td]
[td][b]Yes / No[/b][/td]
[td]Your name[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
You might consider adding BitRef.com to the list. It's an innovative Bitcoin block explorer that provides more detailed information than others, particularly when it comes to unconfirmed Bitcoin transactions. I've put a lot of effort into developing it, and I believe it is now on par with the others.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
~
Concerning the rating: I would go with a higher rating than a 7, since I am using Arkham quite frequently. Especially if you compare it to a few other explorers on the list that got a higher/same rating.Thank you cygan & bullrun for the suggestion. I added the site rated with 8. cygan, since bullrun mentioned the website first, I think it's fair to use his rating... But I thank you very much for bringing the site to our attention as well, inside the main topic.
I also made the necessary changes to the old table and also to the Romanian translation of the thread.
I'm not sure if we have to sign up to get access to more sets of features on its explorer, but I had no luck in finding a way that could identify Segwit addresses.
Maybe cygan / bullrun can tell us how they tested this...?
- BTW, it doesn't seem to work while JavaScript is turned off.
Thank you, SFR, I mentioned this while doing the update.
Blockstream works without JavaScript.
Thank you, SFR10! You update is now visible everywhere I could add it
I will PM also the translators to make these changes but, first, we need to know for sure if the website recognizes SegWit addresses or not...
~Snipped~
I'm not sure if we have to sign up to get access to more sets of features on its explorer, but I had no luck in finding a way that could identify Segwit addresses.- BTW, it doesn't seem to work while JavaScript is turned off.
@GazetaBitcoin
I forgot to also post an update here [my post in our local thread], but Blockstream works without JavaScript.
~
Thanks for mentioning my post @cygan.
Concerning the rating: I would go with a higher rating than a 7, since I am using Arkham quite frequently. Especially if you compare it to a few other explorers on the list that got a higher/same rating.
Since its a subjective rating you can of course rank it with 7 stars, just remove my name from the "rated by" area.
My subjetive rating would be an 8+, but that's only my opinion of course (and ofc, I would rate some other explorers on the list differently).
bullrun2024bro suggested the blockchain explorer called Arkham Computer in the german thread yesterday
this specific explorer can also be used to monitor various wallets as well as transactions from various other blockchains.
i have now also taken a closer look at it and here is my rating:
this specific explorer can also be used to monitor various wallets as well as transactions from various other blockchains.
i have now also taken a closer look at it and here is my rating:
| Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating)  *** | Works without JS? | Rated by |
| ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _________________________________ | ____________________ | ________________ |
| Arkham Computer | Yes / Yes | Yes | 7 / 10 Points | ? | bullrun2024bro / cygan |
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Sure... Sorry for not including the necessary details [my bad]. They're connected to a group of platforms that are known for their selective scams in our community [e.g. Changelly is one of them as well]
Ohhh... Thank you for this information, SFR10!
I was not aware of the incidents with ChangeNOW, since I wasn't on the forum in that period... But for sure I heard about Changelly and I am aware of many unfortunate incidents which happened to various people because of this exchange...
Well, that is enough for me for not considering adding blockexplorers.nownodes.io to OP since the website was created by ChangeNOW. salad daging, thank you for your proposal, but given the information provided by SFR10 I think it's best to avoid listing this website.
I am not sure about what you are talking here SFR... Can you offer more details, please...? Maybe it's an old story which I am not aware of...?
Sure... Sorry for not including the necessary details [my bad]. They're connected to a group of platforms that are known for their selective scams in our community [e.g. Changelly is one of them as well]:- ChangeNOW [their "trust summary page" has the necessary reference links, but you can start from "this thread"]
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
I couldn't find a way to identify Segwit addresses and it appears to only partially work without enabling JavaScript.
Thank you for your input, SFR10!
salad daging, if you read this, can we have your opinion too, please?
If it were up to me, I wouldn't list them mainly because of the fact that it was created by "ChangeNOW [I do know it's just an explorer, but I can't ignore their past history in our community]"!
I am not sure about what you are talking here SFR... Can you offer more details, please...? Maybe it's an old story which I am not aware of...?
If there is something missing, please correct it. Thank you.
I couldn't find a way to identify Segwit addresses and it appears to only partially work without enabling JavaScript.So if other users could add their input, it would be highly appreciated!
If it were up to me, I wouldn't list them mainly because of the fact that it was created by "ChangeNOW [I do know it's just an explorer, but I can't ignore their past history in our community]"! legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
@GazetaBitcoin This Bitcoin Block Explorer wasn't on the table yet, so I added this one.
If there is something missing, please correct it. Thank you.
If there is something missing, please correct it. Thank you.
Thank you for your suggestion, salad daging!
I will add it to OP... but I wish that other to take a look also at this site... I never heard of it before... So if other users could add their input, it would be highly appreciated!
At same time, I noticed that you rated its usefulness with 6/10, but your comment says that it's not user friendly. In this context, do you believe that 6/10 is the correct mark...? There is nothing subtle about my question, just making sure that you believe the mark is correct
@GazetaBitcoin This Bitcoin Block Explorer wasn't on the table yet, so I added this one.
If there is something missing, please correct it. Thank you.
If there is something missing, please correct it. Thank you.
| Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?** | Usefulness (subjective rating) *** | Works without JS? | Rated by |
| ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _________________________________ | ____________________ | ________________ |
| blockexplorers.nownodes.io | Yes / Yes | Yes | 6 / 10 Points | ? | salad daging |
Jump to: