Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.
Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.
| Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)
supported? | SegWit (P2SH)
identifiable?* | Usefulness
(subjective rating  ) | Rated by | Comments |
| ____________ | _______________________ | ______________ | ___________________ | __________ | ______________________________________________________ |
| bitquery | Yes / Yes | Yes | 7 / 10 Points | Rizzrack | Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual
representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address |
Added, many thanks for sharing.
The rating is, as the table header suggests, my own subjective rating. Feel free to add your own rating score in the OP
Subjective rating are perfectly fine as it's allowed for whoever will bring up the block explorer, to rate it, too.
My table contains a separate colum (rated by), also linking to the post where the block explorer has been suggested.
Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.
As always, my pleasure! Sir! Yes Sir (Indian accent
)
I'll get you a cookie.
Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"
Yes, I know about this update. I added it too, when you implemented it.
Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent)
Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?
But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"
By looking at your table, there is only 1 site which does not support Bech32 -- Wallet Explorer (but, curiously, it says that it supports Bech32m -- is this information correct?) -- which is 1 out of 27 explorers (~0.03%). Given the percentage being so small, I believe that you can remove that part.
You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.
It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged.
I'll be looking forward for your update. Just don't forget to ping me too, please, to make sure the translation will be also up to date.
I won't forget, dear GazetaBitcoin.
Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP.
No worry, it happens. Yesterday I fought about one hour with the update of Romanian version. I tried to update OP about 5 times but each time something happened and my changes were not saved... then I also forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com so it appeared both at working explorers and at eliminated ones... It may happen
Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it.
