List of useful Bitcoin block explorers - page 10.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: ajiz138 on September 29, 2022, 02:04:48 PM

One more Bitcoin Explorer not on the OP's list yet, I checked all the comments but I don't think this was mentioned.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
BitInfoCharts	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance

You are right, it's not added yet and I've added it now to my list, many thanks for sharing.

But you have entered "Yes" for "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?". I've checked it but there's no clear indication, so I've changed it to "No". Maybe you know more about it, why you've entered "Yes"? I've changed it to "No" right now but if you have more information, I can change it back again.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 785

One more Bitcoin Explorer not on the OP's list yet, I checked all the comments but I don't think this was mentioned.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
BitInfoCharts	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 04:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

[...]

Added, many thanks for sharing.

I also added both modifications to Romanian translation.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.

Yes, most likely. This update is now also reflected in the translated topic.

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 04:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Loooooooooool! Yes, Sir! Cookie for you, Sir!

Woow, a cookie!
May I ask how big (which scale) it is?
But Sirs don't get cookies, Sirs are only giving it out. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 04:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Sadly, this is correct. I remember the discussion about this website... I guess it was useful, as it could link various addresses to (some) wallets, which is a feature that I do not know if any other explorer has. If we find any other explorer with this feature it would be great, as it helps (a lot) for tracking purposes. (For example, it helped me when I performed the investigation on coins held by paraipan...)

Or we can use it via VPN / Tor.
Even checking shitposter addresses shouldn't hurt there (or you will go to jail for shitposting). Cheesy

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 04:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

Yes, by giving the necessary effort, it can be done. I can't even imagine how much time you spent for creating that table!

Plz don't remind me...
This one was horrible, too...

Quote from: ajiz138 on September 28, 2022, 01:28:17 PM

Quote from: 1miau on September 24, 2022, 04:56:32 PM

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.

I've removed them, added a reason and linked your post here.

I think TokenView should be re-added to the OP and now accessible again, it was originally a .com domain and this is indeed inaccessible now switching to a .io domain accessible.

Indeed, it's working again.
I've added your suggestion to my table, many thanks for sharing.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 785

Quote from: 1miau on September 24, 2022, 04:56:32 PM

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.

I've removed them, added a reason and linked your post here.

I think TokenView should be re-added to the OP and now accessible again, it was originally a .com domain and this is indeed inaccessible now switching to a .io domain accessible.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
TokenView	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

[...]

Added, many thanks for sharing.

I also added both modifications to Romanian translation.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Si! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

I'll get you a cookie. Wink

Thank you, Sir (same Indian accent)!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Loooooooooool! Yes, Sir! Cookie for you, Sir!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.

Yes, most likely. This update is now also reflected in the translated topic.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Sadly, this is correct. I remember the discussion about this website... I guess it was useful, as it could link various addresses to (some) wallets, which is a feature that I do not know if any other explorer has. If we find any other explorer with this feature it would be great, as it helps (a lot) for tracking purposes. (For example, it helped me when I performed the investigation on coins held by paraipan...)

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

I won't forget, dear GazetaBitcoin. Wink

Danke!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 04:42:19 PM

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

Yes, by giving the necessary effort, it can be done. I can't even imagine how much time you spent for creating that table!

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: LoyceV on September 27, 2022, 05:47:28 AM

Can you add this one?

Quote from: LoyceV on September 06, 2022, 06:16:13 AM

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

Quote from: Rizzrack on September 27, 2022, 06:31:27 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
bitquery	Yes / Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address

Added, many thanks for sharing.

Quote from: Rizzrack on September 27, 2022, 06:31:27 AM

The rating is, as the table header suggests, my own subjective rating. Feel free to add your own rating score in the OP

Subjective rating are perfectly fine as it's allowed for whoever will bring up the block explorer, to rate it, too.
My table contains a separate colum (rated by), also linking to the post where the block explorer has been suggested.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

As always, my pleasure! Sir! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

I'll get you a cookie. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

Yes, I know about this update. I added it too, when you implemented it.

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

By looking at your table, there is only 1 site which does not support Bech32 -- Wallet Explorer (but, curiously, it says that it supports Bech32m -- is this information correct?) -- which is 1 out of 27 explorers (~0.03%). Given the percentage being so small, I believe that you can remove that part.

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.
It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

I'll be looking forward for your update. Just don't forget to ping me too, please, to make sure the translation will be also up to date.

I won't forget, dear GazetaBitcoin. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 09:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

No worry, it happens. Yesterday I fought about one hour with the update of Romanian version. I tried to update OP about 5 times but each time something happened and my changes were not saved... then I also forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com so it appeared both at working explorers and at eliminated ones... It may happen

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

As always, my pleasure! Sir! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

Yes, I know about this update. I added it too, when you implemented it.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

By looking at your table, there is only 1 site which does not support Bech32 -- Wallet Explorer (but, curiously, it says that it supports Bech32m -- is this information correct?) -- which is 1 out of 27 explorers (~0.03%). Given the percentage being so small, I believe that you can remove that part.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

I'll be looking forward for your update. Just don't forget to ping me too, please, to make sure the translation will be also up to date.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

He just did it.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Wow, you are right. When NeuroticFish observed it , he had Igel-Eyes.

Yes, I am also amazed of his spirit of observation. I congratulated him many times for his ~~Igel~~ eagle eye

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

No worry, it happens. Yesterday I fought about one hour with the update of Romanian version. I tried to update OP about 5 times but each time something happened and my changes were not saved... then I also forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com so it appeared both at working explorers and at eliminated ones... It may happen

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

It's updated now.

Awesome! Thank you!

Rizzrack

copper member

Activity: 783

Merit: 710

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 03:14:01 PM

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

The rating is, as the table header suggests, my own subjective rating. Feel free to add your own rating score in the OP

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
bitquery	Yes / Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Can you add this one?

Quote from: LoyceV on September 06, 2022, 06:16:13 AM

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.

This is why:

Quote

the more block explorers out there, the better you can hide your private data from prying eyes.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 09:40:14 AM

Hey 1miau, SFR, and cygan, thanks again for another update. It's important to keep this thread as up to date as possible.

@1miau: as usual, your lattest update appears also in the translated topic, the one from Romanian board. I added the topic you added and I removed the ones you removed as well. Apparently, I had some missing topics from OP (perhaps I forgot to add them when you made previous updates), but now the translated topic reflects all the information from the original.

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 09:40:14 AM

Excepting that, I was also wondering if you have any news about the Taproot research you said you'll make, a while ago (which would also, possibly, lead to an update for the thread - Why people should be using SegWit addresses).

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?" But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?".
For now, it's included both.
I've also updated my code.

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 09:40:14 AM

Later edit: Rizzrack proposed a new explorer - Bitquery - which also seems to be in Beta stage. His reason for proposing it was that "it generates an interactive UI of the transfer of BTC between addresses". If you want to add this one too, let me know.

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 09:40:14 AM

Second later edit: 1miau, you forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com from the list of functional explorers

NeuroticFish observed that, by seeing it still there, in the translated topic.

Wow, you are right. When NeuroticFish observed it , he had Igel-Eyes.

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

It's updated now.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Hey 1miau, SFR, and cygan, thanks again for another update. It's important to keep this thread as up to date as possible.

@1miau: as usual, your lattest update appears also in the translated topic, the one from Romanian board. I added the topic you added and I removed the ones you removed as well. Apparently, I had some missing topics from OP (perhaps I forgot to add them when you made previous updates), but now the translated topic reflects all the information from the original.

Excepting that, I was also wondering if you have any news about the Taproot research you said you'll make, a while ago (which would also, possibly, lead to an update for the thread - Why people should be using SegWit addresses).

Later edit: Rizzrack proposed a new explorer - Bitquery - which also seems to be in Beta stage. His reason for proposing it was that "it generates an interactive UI of the transfer of BTC between addresses". If you want to add this one too, let me know.

Second later edit: 1miau, you forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com from the list of functional explorers

NeuroticFish observed that, by seeing it still there, in the translated topic.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: cygan on September 25, 2022, 02:56:44 AM

i simply entered a segwit address (p2sh) in the search field and the spiral explorer was able to show me several transactions to that address. even if the website does not immediately show a result of the search query, it is best to press the search button several times and it looks like you can only search for Bitcoin addresses at the moment.

Okay, so it doesn't show whether it's a nested SegWit or a Multisignature address, see here: BTC addresses starting with "3" what are they ? simplified explanation.

It's showing the balance but we can't look up which address type it is.
Because usually we can only see this from an outgoing transaction by checking the tx hash.

Changed to "no" for now.
Maybe such an information will be added somewhen later, since it's still in Beta.

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

i simply entered a segwit address (p2sh) in the search field and the spiral explorer was able to show me several transactions to that address. even if the website does not immediately show a result of the search query, it is best to press the search button several times and it looks like you can only search for Bitcoin addresses at the moment.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

Found a bunch of other explorers:
...

Finally added, sorry for the delay.

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.
Bitcoinchain - No longer being maintained ^{[last block height shows 614926, while we're at 749576]}.
Blockexplorer.com - I don't think it has anything to do with Bitcoin +it's also outdated.

I've removed them, added a reason and linked your post here.

Many thanks again for your research.

Quote from: cygan on September 23, 2022, 10:27:33 AM

today i came across a Bitcoin explorer which is unknown to me and relatively very new and currently still in the beta phase

Interesting one, also added to the list including your description. Maybe you have some time later for a rating.
So far, it's only too look up a specific address, while tx hash / block number doesn't work. Empty addresses are also shown as "invalid".
Since we can only judge from a tx hash if an (sending) address is (nested) SegWit or Multisig, it wasn't possible for me to verify if it's a SegWit address or not. In your summary, you said "SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifyable?* - Yes". May I ask where you got it from?
Do you know if more than just addresses will be featured at some point?

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Quote from: cygan on September 23, 2022, 10:27:33 AM

today i came across a Bitcoin explorer which is unknown to me and relatively very new and currently still in the beta phase
this explorer also supports the new taproot (bc1p...) addresses. the special feature of the explorer is also the use of a fully homomorphic encryption to guarantee the privacy of its own balance lookups.

I wrote about this Spiral explorer before and I like what they are doing, but today I noticed they added footer saying that code has not been formally audited, and they don't recommend using it for mission-critical applications.
I wouldn't recommend using it for general use until we see code review, adding more features and coming out from beta phase.
Maybe they plan to stay closed source since they are joining forces with ledger wallet Tongue

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3304

Merit: 8633

Crypto Swap Exchange

today i came across a Bitcoin explorer which is unknown to me and relatively very new and currently still in the beta phase
this explorer also supports the new taproot (bc1p...) addresses. the special feature of the explorer is also the use of a fully homomorphic encryption to guarantee the privacy of its own balance lookups.

Name (link)	Bech32 supported?	SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifyable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
__________________________	___________________	___________________________________	_______________________________	____________________	___________________________________
Spiral	Yes (09/2022)	Yes (09/2022)	x / 10 Points	cygan	beta phase ... unfortunately cant yet say anything about it. therefore also no rating

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on June 08, 2022, 04:11:54 AM

Hey 1miau and SFR, thank you for this important update as well. @1miau: I'd like to let you know that the update appears also in the translated topic, for which I pay great attention to always keep it up to date with any changes made within the original thread. As you can see yourself, all changes are already visible

+1
well done to keep it updated

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on June 08, 2022, 04:11:54 AM

Excepting that, I was also wondering if references to Taproot could be also added in this other topic written by 1miau - Why people should be using SegWit addresses, also translated in Romanian. I addressed this question as it was also raised inside Romanian board. I hope this helps.

Yes, we've talked about that in our PMs and since SqiurrelJulietGarden has already created a new topic about it, I'll skip this one but of course, I'll update my list of address types.
I'll update it as discussed via PM.

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

Found a bunch of other explorers:

...

Great contribution again, I'll add it to my list when I've some more time next weekend.

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 11:43:07 AM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.
Bitcoinchain - No longer being maintained ^{[last block height shows 614926, while we're at 749576]}.
Blockexplorer.com - I don't think it has anything to do with Bitcoin +it's also outdated.

Noted, I'll create a new table called "outdated or inaccessible".

SFR10

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 3406

Crypto Swap Exchange

Found a bunch of other explorers:

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit-Addresses (P2SH) identifyable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
__________________________	_______________________________	___________________________________	_______________________________	____________________	___________________________________
OKLink	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7.5 / 10 Points	SFR10	It quickly became one of my favorites!
BitcoinExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	7 / 10 Points	SFR10	Simple and clean.
Btcscan	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	Yes (08/2022)	6 / 10 Points	SFR10
BitcoinBlockExplorer	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	5 / 10 Points	SFR10
Atomic	Yes (08/2022) / Yes (08/2022)	No (08/2022)	4.5 / 10 Points	SFR10	Outdated UI

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.
Bitcoinchain - No longer being maintained ^{[last block height shows 614926, while we're at 749576]}.
Blockexplorer.com - I don't think it has anything to do with Bitcoin +it's also outdated.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Hey 1miau and SFR, thank you for this important update as well. @1miau: I'd like to let you know that the update appears also in the translated topic, for which I pay great attention to always keep it up to date with any changes made within the original thread. As you can see yourself, all changes are already visible

Excepting that, I was also wondering if references to Taproot could be also added in this other topic written by 1miau - Why people should be using SegWit addresses, also translated in Romanian. I addressed this question as it was also raised inside Romanian board. I hope this helps.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: SFR10 on May 28, 2022, 01:57:12 AM

@1miau
Just finished checking the whole list and it appears that more than half of the current list ^{[14 to be exact]} already supports displaying Taproot addresses ^[P2TR], so perhaps we should consider including that feature in the list...
^{- We can just modify the second column slightly by dividing it into two parts (e.g. Bech32/m or Bech32/Bech32m).}

Code:

Blockchair.com
Trezor Bitcoin Explorer
mempool
bitaps.com
BTC.com
chainflyer.bitflyer.jp
SoChain
Blockcypher.com
Coinmarketcap Block Explorer
Blockpath
Blockstream
Insight
Walletexplorer.com
Crystal Explorer

Hi!

I've included your research in my table ~~but do you know where it is possible in those explorers to see if a bech32 address is a "normal" bech32 address or a P2TR address?~~
Haven't followed Taproot much recently, unfortunately. Cry

My bad, wrong colum where I was looking for. Cheesy

I've fixed it and details are now included.

Topic: List of useful Bitcoin block explorers - page 10. (Read 6326 times)