List of useful Bitcoin block explorers - page 8.

SFR10

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 3406

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: 1miau on October 10, 2022, 07:58:03 PM

A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer...

It seems that they just silently added the support for Taproot addresses ^{[the interesting part is the fact that you made this comment two weeks ago, and now it's here]} Wink

^{- screenshot}

Good news: Crystal explorer has decided to "indefinitely suspend" its operation ^{[one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]}!

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 783

Added one more Bitcoin explorer Wink

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
Learnmeabitcoin	Yes	NO	5 / 10 Points	ajiz138	I find this explorer quite simple and nothing more than that.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: SFR10 on October 10, 2022, 02:53:26 AM

Quote from: 1miau on October 09, 2022, 08:10:08 PM

Many thanks, I've added them to my list.

I just checked and it looks like there's Taproot support on "Yogh".

Indeed, it's working, I think I have entered the address into the other suggestion from ajiz138 and confused it, therefore adding "No" to both... Cheesy

It's changed now.

Quote from: SFR10 on October 10, 2022, 02:53:26 AM

^{- While I was doing the above thing, I noticed the one beneath it ^{[Blockexplorer.one]} seems to have added support for such addresses as well, but not sure when it was added exactly.}

Added as well. Could have happened recently.

Quote from: SFR10 on October 10, 2022, 02:53:26 AM

With regard to "Spiral", I sent a small amount to my Taproot address and it also showed the result with roughly 10-minutes of delay after the confirmation.

I've tried it as well and it's also working there for addresses containing a balance.

In addition I've completed the table and added "No" instead of previously free spots, which also meant "No" but it should be visualized better now.

A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer...

SFR10

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 3406

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: 1miau on October 09, 2022, 08:10:08 PM

Many thanks, I've added them to my list.

I just checked and it looks like there's Taproot support on "Yogh".
^{- While I was doing the above thing, I noticed the one beneath it ^{[Blockexplorer.one]} seems to have added support for such addresses as well, but not sure when it was added exactly.}

With regard to "Spiral", I sent a small amount to my Taproot address and it also showed the result with roughly 10-minutes of delay after the confirmation.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: ajiz138 on October 09, 2022, 04:50:39 PM

I added two more Bitcoin explorers, and of course before posting I looked at the OP but it wasn't on the list so I created one.

Many thanks, I've added them to my list.

Quote from: ajiz138 on October 09, 2022, 04:50:39 PM

If I don't know about "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*" maybe you can modify it again. Cheesy

I've added "no" to both. Especially Txflow seems to be a little bit odd, because tx hashs can't be checked. It looks more like a visualisation website for ingoing / outgoing transactions from / to an specific address, not a real Blockexplorer. While Taproot (bc1p) addresses don't work.
Blocks can't be checked as well.

I've added it to "Different other sites".

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 783

I added two more Bitcoin explorers, and of course before posting I looked at the OP but it wasn't on the list so I created one.

If I don't know about "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*" maybe you can modify it again. Cheesy

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
Yogh	Yes	?	4 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer is quite simple but less interesting IMO

Name (link)

Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)
supported?

SegWit (P2SH)
identifiable?*

Usefulness
(subjective rating Tongue

)

Rated by

Comments

____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
Txflow	Yes	?	4 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer is quite slow

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: 1miau on September 29, 2022, 07:33:11 PM

Quote from: ajiz138 on September 29, 2022, 03:04:48 PM

One more Bitcoin Explorer not on the OP's list yet, I checked all the comments but I don't think this was mentioned.

You are right, it's not added yet and I've added it now to my list, many thanks for sharing.

But you have entered "Yes" for "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?". I've checked it but there's no clear indication, so I've changed it to "No". Maybe you know more about it, why you've entered "Yes"? I've changed it to "No" right now but if you have more information, I can change it back again.

Thank you, ajiz138, for this suggestion and to 1miau for the update, together with the small modification added.

The new recommended website, together with 1miau's modification related SegWit, appears also in the translated topic, the one from Romanian board.

I am sorry for delaying the update with almost 5 days since the new website was posted, but I literally had no free time during all this while. I will try to make the future updates as fast as possible.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: ajiz138 on September 29, 2022, 03:04:48 PM

One more Bitcoin Explorer not on the OP's list yet, I checked all the comments but I don't think this was mentioned.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
BitInfoCharts	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance

You are right, it's not added yet and I've added it now to my list, many thanks for sharing.

But you have entered "Yes" for "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?". I've checked it but there's no clear indication, so I've changed it to "No". Maybe you know more about it, why you've entered "Yes"? I've changed it to "No" right now but if you have more information, I can change it back again.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 783

One more Bitcoin Explorer not on the OP's list yet, I checked all the comments but I don't think this was mentioned.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
BitInfoCharts	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	This explorer can see the top and busiest wallets, there is a graph that can see the movement of our balance

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 05:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

[...]

Added, many thanks for sharing.

I also added both modifications to Romanian translation.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.

Yes, most likely. This update is now also reflected in the translated topic.

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 05:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Loooooooooool! Yes, Sir! Cookie for you, Sir!

Woow, a cookie!
May I ask how big (which scale) it is?
But Sirs don't get cookies, Sirs are only giving it out. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 05:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Sadly, this is correct. I remember the discussion about this website... I guess it was useful, as it could link various addresses to (some) wallets, which is a feature that I do not know if any other explorer has. If we find any other explorer with this feature it would be great, as it helps (a lot) for tracking purposes. (For example, it helped me when I performed the investigation on coins held by paraipan...)

Or we can use it via VPN / Tor.
Even checking shitposter addresses shouldn't hurt there (or you will go to jail for shitposting). Cheesy

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 28, 2022, 05:04:55 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

Yes, by giving the necessary effort, it can be done. I can't even imagine how much time you spent for creating that table!

Plz don't remind me...
This one was horrible, too...

Quote from: ajiz138 on September 28, 2022, 02:28:17 PM

Quote from: 1miau on September 24, 2022, 05:56:32 PM

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 12:43:07 PM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.

I've removed them, added a reason and linked your post here.

I think TokenView should be re-added to the OP and now accessible again, it was originally a .com domain and this is indeed inaccessible now switching to a .io domain accessible.

Indeed, it's working again.
I've added your suggestion to my table, many thanks for sharing.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 783

Quote from: 1miau on September 24, 2022, 05:56:32 PM

Quote from: SFR10 on August 15, 2022, 12:43:07 PM

The following explorers should move out of the main list:

Tokenview - Inaccessible.

I've removed them, added a reason and linked your post here.

I think TokenView should be re-added to the OP and now accessible again, it was originally a .com domain and this is indeed inaccessible now switching to a .io domain accessible.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
TokenView	Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	ajiz138	Interesting block explorer, and there's a balance chart underneath.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

[...]

Added, many thanks for sharing.

I also added both modifications to Romanian translation.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Si! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

I'll get you a cookie. Wink

Thank you, Sir (same Indian accent)!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Loooooooooool! Yes, Sir! Cookie for you, Sir!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.

Yes, most likely. This update is now also reflected in the translated topic.

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Sadly, this is correct. I remember the discussion about this website... I guess it was useful, as it could link various addresses to (some) wallets, which is a feature that I do not know if any other explorer has. If we find any other explorer with this feature it would be great, as it helps (a lot) for tracking purposes. (For example, it helped me when I performed the investigation on coins held by paraipan...)

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

I won't forget, dear GazetaBitcoin. Wink

Danke!

Quote from: 1miau on September 27, 2022, 05:42:19 PM

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

Yes, by giving the necessary effort, it can be done. I can't even imagine how much time you spent for creating that table!

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: LoyceV on September 27, 2022, 06:47:28 AM

Can you add this one?

Quote from: LoyceV on September 06, 2022, 07:16:13 AM

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.

Added as "Different other sites / .onion links", many thanks for sharing.

Quote from: Rizzrack on September 27, 2022, 07:31:27 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
bitquery	Yes / Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address

Added, many thanks for sharing.

Quote from: Rizzrack on September 27, 2022, 07:31:27 AM

The rating is, as the table header suggests, my own subjective rating. Feel free to add your own rating score in the OP

Subjective rating are perfectly fine as it's allowed for whoever will bring up the block explorer, to rate it, too.
My table contains a separate colum (rated by), also linking to the post where the block explorer has been suggested.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

As always, my pleasure! Sir! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

I'll get you a cookie. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

Yes, I know about this update. I added it too, when you implemented it.

Great to hear, Sir! (also Indian accent) Cheesy

Maybe you can get me a cookie as well, Sir?

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

By looking at your table, there is only 1 site which does not support Bech32 -- Wallet Explorer (but, curiously, it says that it supports Bech32m -- is this information correct?) -- which is 1 out of 27 explorers (~0.03%). Given the percentage being so small, I believe that you can remove that part.

You are right. Since our rating is from 2019, it got updated most likely in the meantime.
It's now updated in my OP but using this explorer is currently discouraged. Lips sealed

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

I'll be looking forward for your update. Just don't forget to ping me too, please, to make sure the translation will be also up to date.

I won't forget, dear GazetaBitcoin. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 27, 2022, 10:33:03 AM

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

No worry, it happens. Yesterday I fought about one hour with the update of Romanian version. I tried to update OP about 5 times but each time something happened and my changes were not saved... then I also forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com so it appeared both at working explorers and at eliminated ones... It may happen

Yes, table formatting is very annoying sometimes and the one in our topic here is a very detailed one, too.
But hey, we did it. Wink

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

As always, my pleasure! Sir! Yes Sir (Indian accent Grin

)

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

Yes, I know about this update. I added it too, when you implemented it.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?"

By looking at your table, there is only 1 site which does not support Bech32 -- Wallet Explorer (but, curiously, it says that it supports Bech32m -- is this information correct?) -- which is 1 out of 27 explorers (~0.03%). Given the percentage being so small, I believe that you can remove that part.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

I'll be looking forward for your update. Just don't forget to ping me too, please, to make sure the translation will be also up to date.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

He just did it.

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Wow, you are right. When NeuroticFish observed it , he had Igel-Eyes.

Yes, I am also amazed of his spirit of observation. I congratulated him many times for his ~~Igel~~ eagle eye

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

No worry, it happens. Yesterday I fought about one hour with the update of Romanian version. I tried to update OP about 5 times but each time something happened and my changes were not saved... then I also forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com so it appeared both at working explorers and at eliminated ones... It may happen

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

It's updated now.

Awesome! Thank you!

Rizzrack

copper member

Activity: 763

Merit: 692

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Quote from: 1miau on September 26, 2022, 04:14:01 PM

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

The rating is, as the table header suggests, my own subjective rating. Feel free to add your own rating score in the OP

Name (link)	Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?	SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*	Usefulness (subjective rating )	Rated by	Comments
____________	_______________________	______________	___________________	__________	______________________________________________________
bitquery	Yes / Yes	Yes	7 / 10 Points	Rizzrack	Can separate ingoing from outgoing tx and has a very cool visual representation of the flow of coins to and from a certain address

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Can you add this one?

Quote from: LoyceV on September 06, 2022, 07:16:13 AM

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.

This is why:

Quote

the more block explorers out there, the better you can hide your private data from prying eyes.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 10:40:14 AM

Hey 1miau, SFR, and cygan, thanks again for another update. It's important to keep this thread as up to date as possible.

@1miau: as usual, your lattest update appears also in the translated topic, the one from Romanian board. I added the topic you added and I removed the ones you removed as well. Apparently, I had some missing topics from OP (perhaps I forgot to add them when you made previous updates), but now the translated topic reflects all the information from the original.

Much appreciated, dear GazetaBitcoin! Great to have our Romanian translation updated frequently.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 10:40:14 AM

Excepting that, I was also wondering if you have any news about the Taproot research you said you'll make, a while ago (which would also, possibly, lead to an update for the thread - Why people should be using SegWit addresses).

Yes, we have changed the OP and expanded "Bech32 supported?" to "Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported?" But maybe we can simply remove the Bech32 part since so many explorers are supporting it and just leave "Bech32m (P2TR) supported?".
For now, it's included both.
I've also updated my code.

I'll also try to update Why people should be using SegWit addresses and add Taproot. Wink

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 10:40:14 AM

Later edit: Rizzrack proposed a new explorer - Bitquery - which also seems to be in Beta stage. His reason for proposing it was that "it generates an interactive UI of the transfer of BTC between addresses". If you want to add this one too, let me know.

Ok, I can add it. But maybe tell him to come here, review and rate it according to my code and I can add it finally from his post and Link it accordingly.

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on September 26, 2022, 10:40:14 AM

Second later edit: 1miau, you forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com from the list of functional explorers

NeuroticFish observed that, by seeing it still there, in the translated topic.

Wow, you are right. When NeuroticFish observed it , he had Igel-Eyes.

Probably, I made a mistake when editing because it's getting really messy in my OP. Tongue

It's updated now.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Hey 1miau, SFR, and cygan, thanks again for another update. It's important to keep this thread as up to date as possible.

@1miau: as usual, your lattest update appears also in the translated topic, the one from Romanian board. I added the topic you added and I removed the ones you removed as well. Apparently, I had some missing topics from OP (perhaps I forgot to add them when you made previous updates), but now the translated topic reflects all the information from the original.

Excepting that, I was also wondering if you have any news about the Taproot research you said you'll make, a while ago (which would also, possibly, lead to an update for the thread - Why people should be using SegWit addresses).

Later edit: Rizzrack proposed a new explorer - Bitquery - which also seems to be in Beta stage. His reason for proposing it was that "it generates an interactive UI of the transfer of BTC between addresses". If you want to add this one too, let me know.

Second later edit: 1miau, you forgot to remove Bitcoinchain.com from the list of functional explorers

NeuroticFish observed that, by seeing it still there, in the translated topic.

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 6618

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: cygan on September 25, 2022, 03:56:44 AM

i simply entered a segwit address (p2sh) in the search field and the spiral explorer was able to show me several transactions to that address. even if the website does not immediately show a result of the search query, it is best to press the search button several times and it looks like you can only search for Bitcoin addresses at the moment.

Okay, so it doesn't show whether it's a nested SegWit or a Multisignature address, see here: BTC addresses starting with "3" what are they ? simplified explanation.

It's showing the balance but we can't look up which address type it is.
Because usually we can only see this from an outgoing transaction by checking the tx hash.

Changed to "no" for now.
Maybe such an information will be added somewhen later, since it's still in Beta.

cygan

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 7618

Cashback 15%

i simply entered a segwit address (p2sh) in the search field and the spiral explorer was able to show me several transactions to that address. even if the website does not immediately show a result of the search query, it is best to press the search button several times and it looks like you can only search for Bitcoin addresses at the moment.

Topic: List of useful Bitcoin block explorers - page 8. (Read 5295 times)