- I'm going to rate it as a solid 3, but I'm not sure if it belongs to the first table, so I'll let you [@1miau] decide instead
Topic: List of useful Bitcoin block explorers - page 9. (Read 6386 times)
Found another one [Bitfeed] while I was scrolling through the "Twitter feed" of Timechain Calendar's [previously mentioned by "cygan"] developer... Despite lacking the option to search for a specific address [you can only search for TX ID and block height], it comes with a breakdown tree feature and that's useful in following the trail [you need to click on each of the boxes to see it (by hovering over each of the boxes, it'd reveal various types of information)].
- I'm going to rate it as a solid 3, but I'm not sure if it belongs to the first table, so I'll let you [@1miau] decide instead
- I'm going to rate it as a solid 3, but I'm not sure if it belongs to the first table, so I'll let you [@1miau] decide instead
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Thank you also for this interesting site, cygan! I can say that it's one of a kind, so far... I never saw any other one similar to this one. I think I'll play with it for a while too.
@1miau: I also updated Romanian topic with the new site.
Excepting that, NeuroticFish observed that SoChain is working again now. I verified it too and it works on my side. Perhaps you can remove the comment from OP which says that SoChain is currently not available...? I hope this helps.
@1miau: I also updated Romanian topic with the new site.
Excepting that, NeuroticFish observed that SoChain is working again now. I verified it too and it works on my side. Perhaps you can remove the comment from OP which says that SoChain is currently not available...? I hope this helps.
i found a great and very useful website today, which is not directly related to a block explorer but you can still get access to various block information of the complete blockchain
Interesting one, thanks for sharing here! I've added it to our category "different / other sites" as it's indeed very useful and fits in well in that list:
| Site | Description | Suggested by |
| ______________________________________________________________________________ | ________________________________________________ | ____________ |
| Timechain Calendar | displaying different Blockchain-related metrics | cygan |
e.g. when and in which epoch exactly the respective block has been mined ... the whole tool is called 'timechain calender'
for me personally a nice tool to 'play' something in the already long block past
Nice UI that is mobile friendly too, I like it.for me personally a nice tool to 'play' something in the already long block past
I more like one information - Next Diff Adj (Next Difficulty Adjustment). It is useful to get an estimation for next adjustment on network difficulty especially if it is congested and miners shutdown their ASICs massively by whatever reasons (serious temporary loses or floods, catastrophes, bans on mining etc.)
I know other Bitcoin block explorers have that information too but for the one you shared, it is what I like most.
i found a great and very useful website today, which is not directly related to a block explorer but you can still get access to various block information of the complete blockchain
e.g. when and in which epoch exactly the respective block has been mined ... the whole tool is called 'timechain calender'
for me personally a nice tool to 'play' something in the already long block past
edit: version 0.3 offers a live visualization of the last 24 hours of block production. each block is positioned on the ring based on the exact timestamp at which it was mined.
e.g. when and in which epoch exactly the respective block has been mined ... the whole tool is called 'timechain calender'
for me personally a nice tool to 'play' something in the already long block past
edit: version 0.3 offers a live visualization of the last 24 hours of block production. each block is positioned on the ring based on the exact timestamp at which it was mined.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Thanks again, SFR10, for all the involvement you have for this topic. And thank you too, 1miau, for operating the changes.
This is just a short heads-up, to let you know that all new modifications of OP are now reflected within the translated topic as well. Once again, sorry for managing these changes with a delay of a few days, but I really could not attend them faster. I'll try to improve my reaction time in the future
Cheers!
This is just a short heads-up, to let you know that all new modifications of OP are now reflected within the translated topic as well. Once again, sorry for managing these changes with a delay of a few days, but I really could not attend them faster. I'll try to improve my reaction time in the future
Cheers!
Small update:
I've added a comment pointing out the issue. - SoChain is broken at the moment [the same thing goes for their other explorers].
- Quote from: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/G7yFFWe're sorry, but something went wrong.
- The following explorers are showing Taproot addresses without any stats [not sure if you should change their "YES" in the Bech32m column...]:
I'll skip them for now and only add them if it's done properly to avoid confusing people. Some might use a certain explorer and get disappointed.
- BitInfoCharts didn't show anything when I searched for a Taproot address.
I've change it to "No".
- Atomic appears to be mirroring the Trezor explorer at the moment [the same thing also applies to some of their other explorers].
Many thanks for your research!
Small update:
The following explorers are showing Taproot addresses without any stats [not sure if you should change their "YES" in the Bech32m column...]:
bitquery
The following explorers are showing Taproot addresses without any stats [not sure if you should change their "YES" in the Bech32m column...]:
bitquery
bitquery shows info for taproot addresses: https://explorer.bitquery.io/bitcoin/address/bc1pdqrcrxa8vx6gy75mfdfj84puhxffh4fq46h3gkp6jxdd0vjcsdyspfxcv6?from=2022-05-01&till=2022-11-10
The problem is that by default it displays info about the inputs and outputs in the last 7 days.
You would need to manually adjust the date range so it displays older info. It's in the top right of the page.
I like the fact that you can search between dates but find it very annoying that the default is 1 week
Small update:
- SoChain is broken at the moment [the same thing goes for their other explorers].
- Quote from: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/G7yFFWe're sorry, but something went wrong.
- The following explorers are showing Taproot addresses without any stats [not sure if you should change their "YES" in the Bech32m column...]:
- BitInfoCharts didn't show anything when I searched for a Taproot address.
- Atomic appears to be mirroring the Trezor explorer at the moment [the same thing also applies to some of their other explorers].
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Much appreciated, as usually!
Pleasure is all mine
Most likely, we need more _ _ _ (but no stealing from o_e_l_e_o's name 
).
).Why not? He has thousands!
Our _ _ _ are limiting column size here and I have removed 2 _ from Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* and removed 6 _ from Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) + added 4_ in general, so we could add 12 _ to your column in question, and it should work like this (just replace in your translated topic our _ _ _ table row)
) + added 4_ in general, so we could add 12 _ to your column in question, and it should work like this (just replace in your translated topic our _ _ _ table row)Fiuuu! 1miau, you are a genie in a bottle and guru of "_"s! Thank you very much, my friend! I just replaced the old code with the one you suggested and now it looks perfect:
But what I still don't understand is... why, at beginning, just after I made the translation by copy-pasting your own BBCode, my table was looking well... And only after a while, after some updates, after adding and removing some websites that column started to look inappropriate. Still, I did not make any change to the table BBCode... Maybe you made a change at the table's code, perhaps, and I did not notice it...? I think this happened, maybe, after you added the part containing Bech32m... If it's not that I have no clue why the table changed in time and why it was looking well at beginning.
Anyway, thanks a lot!
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list.
You are right, somehow I missed it.It's moved to "removed Blockexplorers" now.
Thank you for confirming this. I also made the change in the translated topic.
A lot of time it's needed, to pay attention to each line, each separator... For example, in the translated topic, the data from second column (the one related to bech32) doesn't fit on one line, as it happens in your OP. I never figured out why... And I copied exactly the BBCode from your OP. Perhaps, if you want to take a look and see yourself...? Maybe you have a suggestion...? Perhaps I misplaced an operator...? I have no idea.
Most likely, we need more _ _ _ (but no stealing from o_e_l_e_o's name ). Our _ _ _ are limiting column size here and I have removed 2 _ from Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* and removed 6 _ from Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) + added 4_ in general, so we could add 12 _ to your column in question, and it should work like this (just replace in your translated topic our _ _ _ table row)| Nume (link) | Suportă bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* | Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) | Notă acordată de | Comentarii |
| __________________________ | _______________________________ | _________________________________ | _________________________ | ________________ | _________________________________________________________ |
| Blockchair.com | Da (09/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (09/2019) | 8 / 10 Puncte | 1miau | |
| Trezor Bitcoin Explorer | Da (11/2019) / Da (05/2022) | Da (11/2019) | 7.5 / 10 Puncte | Saint-loup | Singurul, pe lângă Blockchair, care recunoaște chei zPub |
| mempool | Da (10/2020) / Da (05/2022) | Da (10/2020) | 7.5 / 10 Puncte | SFR10 | Interfață frumoasă și foarte detaliat |
See code below:
Code:
[tr]
[td]__________________________[/td]
[td]_______________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________[/td]
[td]_________________________[/td]
[td]________________[/td]
[td]_________________________________________________________[/td]
[/tr]
It should work now.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list.
You are right, somehow I missed it.It's moved to "removed Blockexplorers" now.
Thank you for confirming this. I also made the change in the translated topic.
Ohhh nooooo!
Such an error has now occured several times after adding new lines to my OP and out of nowhere, my table was messed up.
Such an error has now occured several times after adding new lines to my OP and out of nowhere, my table was messed up.
Working with these BBCode tables is not an easy thing to do for sure. I mostly see it as repairing old clocks
A lot of time it's needed, to pay attention to each line, each separator... For example, in the translated topic, the data from second column (the one related to bech32) doesn't fit on one line, as it happens in your OP. I never figured out why... And I copied exactly the BBCode from your OP. Perhaps, if you want to take a look and see yourself...? Maybe you have a suggestion...? Perhaps I misplaced an operator...? I have no idea.Suddenly, a new Table was started automatically, I didn't add it there, weird!
Happened 4 times already but the last times, I've edited it directly.
Happened 4 times already but the last times, I've edited it directly.
This is weird, indeed...
Done!
I've missed to check the OP after udpating it.
That's also why the Table mistake wasn't edited on time...
I've missed to check the OP after udpating it.
That's also why the Table mistake wasn't edited on time...
No worry, I am glad I could help
Cheers! Thank you, ajiz138, for this new suggestion and to 1miau for the update. I added the new recommended website in the translated topic too, together with a few earlier updates.
+1 @1miau: I think you forgot about this mention made by SFR:
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list.
You are right, somehow I missed it. Crystal explorer has decided to "indefinitely suspend" its operation [one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]!
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list.
It's moved to "removed Blockexplorers" now.
Excepting that, I think that something happened to OP after last update, as it lines appear to not be properly aligned anymore, below the lattest added explorer:
I guess I spotted the error in BBCode: after the segment related to Learnmeabitcoin.com ended -- meaning after the /tr from the end of its section, you added a "/table" and a "table" in the code -- this should be the reason for the improper alignment.
Ohhh nooooo! I guess I spotted the error in BBCode: after the segment related to Learnmeabitcoin.com ended -- meaning after the /tr from the end of its section, you added a "/table" and a "table" in the code -- this should be the reason for the improper alignment.
Such an error has now occured several times after adding new lines to my OP and out of nowhere, my table was messed up.
Suddenly, a new Table was started automatically, I didn't add it there, weird!
Happened 4 times already but the last times, I've edited it directly.
Oh and one more mention, if I may -- please take a look at the "No" of the Learnmeabitcoin.com -- the "No" standing in the column "SegWit identifiable?". This "No" appears with bold, unlike all the others from the table and it's missing the date (I guess 10/200). I hope this helps
Done! I've missed to check the OP after udpating it.
That's also why the Table mistake wasn't edited on time...
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Added to my list as well but it seems to be a little bit weird in terms of design and is quite different to "regular" Block explorers.
Thank you, ajiz138, for this new suggestion and to 1miau for the update. I added the new recommended website in the translated topic too, together with a few earlier updates.
@1miau: I think you forgot about this mention made by SFR:
Crystal explorer has decided to "indefinitely suspend" its operation [one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]!
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list.
Excepting that, I think that something happened to OP after last update, as it lines appear to not be properly aligned anymore, below the lattest added explorer:
I guess I spotted the error in BBCode: after the segment related to Learnmeabitcoin.com ended -- meaning after the /tr from the end of its section, you added a "/table" and a "table" in the code -- this should be the reason for the improper alignment.
Oh and one more mention, if I may -- please take a look at the "No" of the Learnmeabitcoin.com -- the "No" standing in the column "SegWit identifiable?". This "No" appears with bold, unlike all the others from the table and it's missing the date (I guess 10/200). I hope this helps
Added to my list as well but it seems to be a little bit weird in terms of design and is quite different to "regular" Block explorers.
In addition, it doesn't support Taproot addresses (yet).
Yes, nice to see it's added now, I've updated my list
In addition, it doesn't support Taproot addresses (yet).
A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer...
It seems that they just silently added the support for Taproot addresses [the interesting part is the fact that you made this comment two weeks ago, and now it's here]
Blockchain.com is operating a Bitcointalk spy. A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer...
It seems that they just silently added the support for Taproot addresses [the interesting part is the fact that you made this comment two weeks ago, and now it's here] - screenshot
Good news: Crystal explorer has decided to "indefinitely suspend" its operation [one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]!
Added one more Bitcoin explorer
| Name (link) | Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR) supported? | SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?* | Usefulness (subjective rating ) | Rated by | Comments |
| ____________ | _______________________ | ______________ | ___________________ | __________ | ______________________________________________________ |
| Learnmeabitcoin | Yes | NO | 5 / 10 Points | ajiz138 | I find this explorer quite simple and nothing more than that. |
Many thanks, I've added them to my list.
I just checked and it looks like there's Taproot support on "Yogh".It's changed now.
- While I was doing the above thing, I noticed the one beneath it [Blockexplorer.one] seems to have added support for such addresses as well, but not sure when it was added exactly.
Added as well. Could have happened recently. With regard to "Spiral", I sent a small amount to my Taproot address and it also showed the result with roughly 10-minutes of delay after the confirmation.
I've tried it as well and it's also working there for addresses containing a balance. In addition I've completed the table and added "No" instead of previously free spots, which also meant "No" but it should be visualized better now.
A bit embarassing how Blockchain.com doesn't support Taproot addresses in its Block explorer...
Many thanks, I've added them to my list.
I just checked and it looks like there's Taproot support on "Yogh".- While I was doing the above thing, I noticed the one beneath it [Blockexplorer.one] seems to have added support for such addresses as well, but not sure when it was added exactly.
With regard to "Spiral", I sent a small amount to my Taproot address and it also showed the result with roughly 10-minutes of delay after the confirmation.
I added two more Bitcoin explorers, and of course before posting I looked at the OP but it wasn't on the list so I created one.
Many thanks, I've added them to my list. If I don't know about "SegWit (P2SH) identifiable?*" maybe you can modify it again.
I've added "no" to both. Especially Txflow seems to be a little bit odd, because tx hashs can't be checked. It looks more like a visualisation website for ingoing / outgoing transactions from / to an specific address, not a real Blockexplorer. While Taproot (bc1p) addresses don't work. Blocks can't be checked as well.
I've added it to "Different other sites".
Jump to: