Pages:
Author

Topic: Massive abuse in the Russian section. - page 5. (Read 4842 times)

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1654
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
January 18, 2019, 10:41:52 PM
Go there and explain them that trust system is not "like" system.

Those who try to understand already know it:
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49293624
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49274368

Therefore I believe the conflict will be settled through a constructive dialogue after a while.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 10:10:02 PM
i sleeped and have a dream you are scammer ( i not remember details) anyway you are scammer
may be you have some proof im wrong? can you proven you not scammer? i sure no
so relax your ass and not buthurt please Wink
Acceptable.
We will now use your system of beliefs.

I may be a scammer, but I dreamt that the word "scammer" actually means deity. Bow down, cretin!

If evidence is not necessary for claims to be valid, then we shall make any claim we choose.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 09:46:16 PM

I have nightmares, dreaming ~ ~ ~ ~. Sometimes in colors.
Tell me and I won't have nightmares.

hey!  Shocked go to sleep and relax Cool i not wish you dreams ~

@peloso do you have evidence of my scams, or is that just a lie?


i sleeped and have a dream you are scammer ( i not remember details) anyway you are scammer
may be you have some proof im wrong? can you proven you not scammer? i sure no
so relax your ass and not buthurt please Wink
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
January 18, 2019, 09:36:49 PM
You got the answer. It was mistakenly posted in the wrong thread:
Yes, I have just read it. Peloso probably doesn't know it is the same forum. Oh, well, I can go to bed now.
I suppose that the root of the problem is the vast majority of Bitcointalk users are hanging out in local boards only and they know little (or don't know at all) what the trust system is intended for.
In my opinion, members need to get out of their local sections more often, communicate with experienced users and follow the discussions on the forum.
Go there and explain them that trust system is not "like" system.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1654
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
January 18, 2019, 09:13:55 PM
I suppose that the root of the problem is the vast majority of Bitcointalk users are hanging out in local boards only and they know little (or don't know at all) what the trust system is intended for.

In my opinion, members need to get out of their local sections more often, communicate with experienced users and follow the discussions on the forum.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 09:07:55 PM
That's no good. It'll trickle down your leg!
evidence you must provide to this.
to whom I owe, I forgive all debts
If your system of validity is not based on the evidence provided and hence if any premise can be declared true, then it is of no pragmatic use to anyone.

If we're using your system, I could claim "all of the Russian Local board are scammers" as a true statement without any evidence.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 09:05:54 PM
evidence you must provide to this.

to whom I owe, I forgive all debts
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
January 18, 2019, 09:05:05 PM
Tell me and I won't have nightmares.

You got the answer. It was mistakenly posted in the wrong thread:

This is just some fucking kind of thing, Malboroza has reached me and wants to find out why I added those whom I added to the exclusions. (I didn’t like them, I don’t like them, I mean the rest and not the main ones) to sleep the bitch wants to go but wants to find out) ) and actmyname can not calm down that I call him a slave)))
And they declare that I did not correctly did that I added respected people to the exclusions)))
 I shit on them standing

copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 09:00:01 PM
Your premises of the slave or Lauda's pet label are still invalid and have not yet rejected the null hypothesis.
its your opinion and its false
That would imply that your premises are true by definition. That is, we have an axiom which implies "actmyname is a slave" or that "actmyname is Lauda's pet".

I don't think this is the case but we can change the evidence you must provide to this. Provide evidence that this axiom exists in our language.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
January 18, 2019, 08:57:04 PM
its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
i will if you tell me why it iportant for you
I can't sleep because of it. Tell me so I can go to bed. Fair enough?

lets go to bed Cheesy go to sleep
 ill tell you tomorow IF you tell me why it interestig for you
I have nightmares, dreaming ~ ~ ~ ~. Sometimes in colors.
Tell me and I won't have nightmares.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 08:47:03 PM
its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
i will if you tell me why it iportant for you
I can't sleep because of it. Tell me so I can go to bed. Fair enough?

lets go to bed Cheesy go to sleep
 ill tell you tomorow IF you tell me why it interestig for you

Your premises of the slave or Lauda's pet label are still invalid and have not yet rejected the null hypothesis.


its your opinion and its false
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 08:44:18 PM
hey slave i answered you
you have no authority to ask me cos you slave and Lauda's pet

i will answer to marlboroza if he will want
Your premises of the slave or Lauda's pet label are still invalid and have not yet rejected the null hypothesis.

If you would like, I can accept your method of syllogism which forces validity of the conclusion regardless of the soundness of its premises.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
January 18, 2019, 08:43:45 PM
its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
i will if you tell me why it iportant for you
I can't sleep because of it. Tell me so I can go to bed. Fair enough?
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 08:41:10 PM
Quote
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
i will if you tell me why it iportant for you

also i can answer all of your questions  thus I have a litle bit of respect to you..still Cool

but it temporarily
Similar to accepting premises as valid without evidence, if you have no foundation for the inclusion or exclusion of members then you are doing so without any reason.

If there is no foundation to one's actions -- if they act without a rationale, then clearly their actions matter less than someone who does have a solid backing for their decisions.

This is similar to the acceptance of pragmatism: if one doesn't believe in it, then their beliefs don't matter.

hey slave i answered you
you have no authority to ask me cos you slave and Lauda's pet

i will answer to marlboroza if he will want
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 08:33:09 PM
Quote
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
i will if you tell me why it iportant for you

also i can answer all of your questions  thus I have a litle bit of respect to you..still Cool

but it temporarily
Similar to accepting premises as valid without evidence, if you have no foundation for the inclusion or exclusion of members then you are doing so without any reason.

If there is no foundation to one's actions -- if they act without a rationale, then clearly their actions matter less than someone who does have a solid backing for their decisions.

This is similar to the acceptance of pragmatism: if one doesn't believe in it, then their beliefs don't matter.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 08:25:05 PM

It was rhetorical question.
It was rhetorical answer

its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.

i will if you tell me why it iportant for you

also i can answer all of your questions  thus I have a litle bit of respect to you..still Cool

but it temporarily
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
January 18, 2019, 08:00:54 PM
You don't know why you have Admiral in trust list?
see above
It was rhetorical question.

Quote
You must remember the reason why you excluded these members and why you suggested people to exclude them:
Quote
~ Vod
~ SaltySpitoon
~ TMAN
~ Lauda
~ Blazed
~ suchmoon
~ owlcatz
~ yahoo62278
~ actmyname
~ Lutpin
?
i remember most of them but not all
So tell us your reasons. Why have you excluded all these accounts and suggested everyone to exclude them?

its important?
Now, why this sounds so familiar... Roll Eyes
Yes, it is important.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1187
January 18, 2019, 07:50:13 PM
You don't know why you have Admiral in trust list?
see above

~Snip~

sorry Pharmacist i forget about you and even not exluded (apparently you are not very important)
you also Lauda's pet  Cool
she has too much fucking pets as you as actmyname i cant remember all of you
my apologies Roll Eyes
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
January 18, 2019, 07:48:45 PM
who are you to ask proof ? you just fucking slave
and you think i must spend my expensive time for you?
If you do not prove that the premises are sound, then we are unable to draw a valid conclusion from the premises. The onus is on you to reject the null hypothesis.

proving who are you?
you must be enough accusation and shut up not write here
If your premises and conclusions cannot be refuted then your system of verification is flawed. Assuming that we all follow the same system, we can make arbitrary premises without evidence and derive conclusions thereof at will.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
January 18, 2019, 07:39:11 PM
i dont know/remember |Admiral| i dont know why i have positive feedback from him
i didnt make investigation about Admiral and dont know he as scammer
Why do you have Admiral in your trust list then?
i not remember and still not started investigation
You don't know why you have Admiral in trust list?
You must remember the reason why you excluded these members and why you suggested people to exclude them:
Quote
~ Vod
~ SaltySpitoon
~ TMAN
~ Lauda
~ Blazed
~ suchmoon
~ owlcatz
~ yahoo62278
~ actmyname
~ Lutpin
?
Pages:
Jump to: