While the wording may be a bit unfortunate, I guess the following was meant:
Ukraine is an artificial state that was created less than 100 years ago by Lenin, based on the Russian lands of Malorossia and Novorossia, and later expanded by Stalin with the lands of Galicia and the Transcarpathian Rus. The Ukrainian language is too an artificial construct, a mix of the local Russian dialect with heavy infusion of Polish and German.
For the past 25+ years Ukraine has been actively decrying everything, that has to do with its history and instead trying to substitute it with an artificial construct, while the main ideology of the country has become "hate everything that is Russian". Can a country, based on hatred, survive in the long run?
Now, there is nothing wrong with such artificial states, but for them to be viable one vital condition needs to be observed: the people in such a country must live in mutual respect and take cooperative decisions. Look at Switzerland. All important decisions are made through referendums, allowing this - let's be honest - artificial country to blossom. Ukraine violated this vital condition in 2014, when it started shelling Donbass and killing its residence as a response to their referendum for use of Russian language on par with Ukrainian and for greater autonomy in decision how the money that are earned by the region are spent.
With the first artillery shells that the Ukrainian army and ukro-nazis of Azov let lose on the civilian population of Donbass (and are still at it!), and with the US-installed "government" condoning such actions, Ukraine committed a suicide as a state.