Topic: Meanwhile in Ukraine... Revolution. - page 79. (Read 227096 times)

Hmm... I wonder... The second gives a solution to the first. Same-gender couples, who adopt children, who in term are imprinted with the same-gender attraction as being the norm, and cannot adopt, and then you have a larger population which cannot reproduce. The suppression field in practise. Overpopulation problem solved.

This can also be applied to an enemy state, where there is a need to silently dispose of the endemic population.

The only problem would be that children from from hetero couples would mercilessly tease children from homo couples, negating the "positive" homo imprint. That can be solved by mass media targeting child audience with positive reinforcement regarding same-gender relations. This latter bit is what got prohibited by law in Russia.

apparently in the uk, married gay partners can actually adopt a kid! imagine being raised by two males LOL this must be so confusing. btw, uk has everything backwards and other side around.

Problem is - governments do not care about the quality of immigrants. They care about numbers more. More people = more slaves. Because basically we are slaves to them. Even if you are a "parasite", living on a welfare, being old and helpless - you still pay politician salaries. Because you cannot simply survive on your own with that welfare, so that means that some relative helps you, and shares your burden as a slave.

Imagine one fat man as a king. He has 100 subjects, citizens of his country. They are peasants. They work in a field.
There's a rule, that every week, every citizen must give him a bucket of grain. Rest they can keep for themselves.
Now there's 200 of them working in a field. But it can only yield a fixed amount of grain, despite how hard they are working. And the king couldn't care less.
In the end king gets twice as much grain, while his subject get twice less. Excited by that thought, he's sent out a word, that more people are needed in his country.

In my mind - the world is overpopulated. Only people were to benefit from new births are the governments, which need to pay their debts, so they can keep their huge salaries.



I wonder.
 If UK was so tough to gays, Turing and all, Germany sent homos to death, France..., etc etc. How did europe turn to be so gay friendly on such short notice? Where did that shit start? What rich homo could achieve such an amazing feat? Suddenly every dude is proud of taking it in the ass from another dude? Is there a secret ultra gay society with devoted "Rothschilds", parttime government workers all over the world?

Every time when I see these words (i.e. "gayropean", "gayrope") I'm dying from laugh. I can't do anything with this reaction. The person who invented this word is a Master of Trolling.

 In my european (soon to be gayropean I guess)  country drinking a beer in public is a fined offense. And USA is not so gay friendly, there's still a lot of discrimination going on. Not to mention how they wiped out indigenous population, and slavery is still a recent thing. Yet they are allowed to pose themselves as a land of friendship, love, and all the cute little ponies you can hug.
 USSR fell to a multitude of factors, you cannot simply pin it to one exact thing. First of all - when any empire stops growing it collapses. Plenty of examples. You can laugh at me all you want, but I'll also add that CIA helped a little (which is completely natural and understandable) bit. Not sure how things would've turned out if USSR would put same amounts of money into KGB to undermine USA from within, instead of simple espionage.
 KGB does not rule over Russia anymore. Money does. Like in every other country out there. To win an election, you need to afford to at least run at said election. Not mentioning rigging votes to compete with other rich guys. And buying exposure time. And etc and etc.

The HSMP programs have attracted some good quality talent to the EU, but the numbers are not that high.

Very few. None of the migrants groups to Europe are as productive as the native population. However, Eastern Europeans are much better than others. 

Oh... At least some of the Turks do some economically productive activity. Look at all those Somalis and Congolese. 99% of them live off welfare receipts and commit heinous crimes. I don't understand the logic of bringing millions of these people to the EU, when they can recruit hard working people from the Eastern Europe.

Exactly, I suppose that you mean the most of turkish migrants in the EU.

Correct. 2 million+ Eastern Europeans live in the UK. They are paid much less than the British born population, and they receive very less social benefits.

Parasites exists in every nation. They are called "economically unproductive population" if you want me to be politically correct.

you're sick

there is no parasite nation.

But there are some parazite in every nation... like you

+1
so true

rich nations in EU get's market's and more money from less developed countries,
and the difference increases.

Poor countries are forced to reduce of labor and social rights.

I think that the total population of the contributer nations (such as UK, Germany, France, Netherlands.etc) is much higher than that of the parasite nations (Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia.etc).

I don't know how long the EU can sustain itself. EU is another USSR in the making. The "rich" nations such as Germany and the UK are financing bankrupt ones such as Greece and Romania. Add Ukraine in to the equation, and we can expect a complete collapse in the near future.

bryant.coleman
Now they are trying to enrich from the EU.  

Only thing worth a damn in this world is land...
You do not need to own land to place value on Food and fresh water?

A nation cannot survive when 50% of the population remain as parasites and leach off from the other 50%. That is why the USSR collapsed.

http://terragermania.com/2014/03/28/petition-gestartet-wir-wollen-russia-today-auf-deutsch/
https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/russia-today-auf-deutsch-petition
http://www.seewald.ru/internetkonferenz-am-27-03-2014-um-1900-uhr-ueber-russia-today-auf-deutsch-petition/