I didn't create a separate topic and this topic seems to me suitable for my post and therefore I will write it here.
Let me start right off with what I want to say:I believe that it is necessary to increase the number of merit-sources, and the number of sMerit generated by them should be reduced. Proportionally. Increasing merit-sources by 2 times will reduce sMerit generated by the current merit-sources by 2 times (per month). That is, the total number of generated sMerit on the forum will remain the same, and we will only "give" them to new sources.
Why?- Will increase the diversity of opinions, which will allow you to get a more objective view of the topics discussed. Each of the current sources is interested in certain sections
... You mainly post on boards I don't read, so allow me to dump some Merit on this topic.
and topics and has its own specific views on certain things. Accordingly, they encourage only those posts that correspond only to their ideas (will someone like a post that goes against his views? I doubt it).
This means that if there are more merit-sources, then there will be a wider variety of views among these people and they will encourage more diverse points of view, which in turn will motivate users to express more alternative opinions. As you may know, there is no ultimate truth, so it is just important that there is as much diversity in views as possible so that we can choose the best one. If there are few alternatives, then we will be severely limited and may miss a good option.
- It will reduce the workload on current merit-sources and, again, increase the variety and quality of the assessment. Look, some of the sources do not have time to cope with the duties assigned to them to the fullest extent, and it seems to me that it would not hurt to make their life a little easier. If look at the statistics of some of them, you can see that they throw off merit-packs.
Are all these posts super high-quality, useful and informative that they deserve such high rewards? Maybe.
If merit-sources have less sMerit, then they will be able to more effectively and usefully dispose of them. There will be no need to dump in large batches trying to spend the monthly rate.
- Increasing the number of sources will make this system more "decentralized" (we all like decentralization , isn't it?). More "nodes" - less concentration of sMerit in one hand - better circulation in the community.
What negative effects can appear? At the moment I don't see it because the monthly volume of sMerit will remain the same.
This is my subjective opinion and it is quite possible that there are exceptions and I am even mistaken.
Is it technically possible to implement this easily and quickly without creating unnecessary headaches for the administration?
I would like to hear an opinion on this matter from the administration of bitcointalk, active merit-sources and ordinary users of this forum. Let us know if my proposal is worth considering.
More opinions - more new ideas. Of course, only a small part of the general ideas will be implemented, but large volumes will increase the percentage of the most successful ones.