GJ!
What is the intensity for the maximum result? (570/580)
What is the intensity for the maximum result? (570/580)
Use 17 or 18.
Topic: mkxminer: Fast Lyra2Z/Lyra2rev2 miner for AMD GPU (ZCoin, GINcoin, VERT, MONA... - page 3. (Read 52770 times)
September 10, 2018, 08:46:38 PM
Use 17 or 18.
September 10, 2018, 04:42:10 PM
GJ!
What is the intensity for the maximum result? (570/580)
What is the intensity for the maximum result? (570/580)
September 10, 2018, 04:11:18 PM
Hello miners!
I just released beta version of Lyra2Z miner.
Version 4.0beta (only for Windows). Linux version (64 bit) will be added later.
Also, the beta version does not support Lyra2rev2 algorithm currently. That’ll be added in full release.
If you need lyra2rev2, then do not try 4.0 beta yet. This beta is just for Lyra2Z.
The good news is that profitability of Lyra2Z is about 20%-30% higher than lyra2rev2.
For example, compare daily income of 39MHs on Lyra2rev2 and 3.7MHs on Lyra2Z (values for RX580).
Just use https://zpool.ca or https://www.nicehash.com for comparison.
Also, this miner now only supports newer cards (R9 290 and higher).
Recommended GPUs are RX580 and Vega.
If you have an older GPU, please keep using legacy mkxminer 3.1 with lyra2rev2.
Note: I believe old GPUs like Tahiti (Radeon 7990, 7970, 7950) are producing invalid hashes (only HW errors). I may look into that, but it is low priority. Because these cards give very low hashrate on lyra2z. Even R9 390 is 2 times slower on lyra2z than rx480 (while it is only 20% slower on lyra2rev2).
So, if you have R9 390 or earlier, I recommend you to keep using lyra2rev2. But RX480 and newer card owners should definitely try out lyra2z. Just use nicehash or zpool to earn BTC.
Happy hashing!
Thanks
I just released beta version of Lyra2Z miner.
Version 4.0beta (only for Windows). Linux version (64 bit) will be added later.
Also, the beta version does not support Lyra2rev2 algorithm currently. That’ll be added in full release.
If you need lyra2rev2, then do not try 4.0 beta yet. This beta is just for Lyra2Z.
The good news is that profitability of Lyra2Z is about 20%-30% higher than lyra2rev2.
For example, compare daily income of 39MHs on Lyra2rev2 and 3.7MHs on Lyra2Z (values for RX580).
Just use https://zpool.ca or https://www.nicehash.com for comparison.
Also, this miner now only supports newer cards (R9 290 and higher).
Recommended GPUs are RX580 and Vega.
If you have an older GPU, please keep using legacy mkxminer 3.1 with lyra2rev2.
Note: I believe old GPUs like Tahiti (Radeon 7990, 7970, 7950) are producing invalid hashes (only HW errors). I may look into that, but it is low priority. Because these cards give very low hashrate on lyra2z. Even R9 390 is 2 times slower on lyra2z than rx480 (while it is only 20% slower on lyra2rev2).
So, if you have R9 390 or earlier, I recommend you to keep using lyra2rev2. But RX480 and newer card owners should definitely try out lyra2z. Just use nicehash or zpool to earn BTC.
Happy hashing!
Thanks
August 05, 2018, 10:56:02 PM
Any can helpme to install in SMOS? My cards are Tahiti 79xx series.
This is this error:
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 0
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 1
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 2
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 3
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 4
============ Starting Miner ===============
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Starting mkxminer 3.1.0...
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] clGetPlatformsIDs error -1001, verify that drivers are installed properly
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Error: GPU devices not found
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Could not find any GPUs, exitting...
Any can helpme to install? Thank you
I install the miner with this tool: https://github.com/greerso/smOS-unsupported-miners
This is this error:
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 0
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 1
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 2
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 3
Setting powertune level to 5% on adapter 4
============ Starting Miner ===============
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Starting mkxminer 3.1.0...
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] clGetPlatformsIDs error -1001, verify that drivers are installed properly
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Error: GPU devices not found
[05:55:18 - 0 days 00:00:00] Could not find any GPUs, exitting...
Any can helpme to install? Thank you
I install the miner with this tool: https://github.com/greerso/smOS-unsupported-miners
August 04, 2018, 05:18:04 PM
We would like to add your miner to minerstat - https://minerstat.com
Can you make a simple basic api with - hashrate, pool, accepted/rejected shares and uptime in seconds output?
JSON - HTTP or (TCP) is good as well.
Thank you in advance, feel free to send a Private message.
Can you make a simple basic api with - hashrate, pool, accepted/rejected shares and uptime in seconds output?
JSON - HTTP or (TCP) is good as well.
Thank you in advance, feel free to send a Private message.
August 02, 2018, 11:21:10 AM
Hi.
Trying to run under Ubuntu 16.04. I get the err msg:
mkxminer Device not supported: "Ellesmere"
I have 4x RX580 8GB GPUs. Tried ./example.sh
[19:20:10 - 0 days 00:00:00] Starting mkxminer 3.1.0...
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT or GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS environment variable is not set, performance may be worse!
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] Connecting to stratum+tls://vtc.suprnova.cc:5676 as WinMKX.test...
[19:20:12 - 0 days 00:00:01] Difficulty set to 32
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Connected!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected Platforms ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] *0 AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2482.3)
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected GPUs ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#0: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#1: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#2: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#3: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06]
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] Press 'q' to exit application
Trying to run under Ubuntu 16.04. I get the err msg:
mkxminer Device not supported: "Ellesmere"
I have 4x RX580 8GB GPUs. Tried ./example.sh
[19:20:10 - 0 days 00:00:00] Starting mkxminer 3.1.0...
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT or GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS environment variable is not set, performance may be worse!
[19:20:11 - 0 days 00:00:01] Connecting to stratum+tls://vtc.suprnova.cc:5676 as WinMKX.test...
[19:20:12 - 0 days 00:00:01] Difficulty set to 32
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Connected!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:14 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:04] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] clBuildProgram: -11
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Frontend phase failed compilation.
Error: Compilation from LLVMIR binary to IL text failed!
[19:20:15 - 0 days 00:00:05] Device not supported: "Ellesmere". Only AMD GCN devices are supported currently. Please double check that you have AMD videocards.
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected Platforms ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] *0 AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2482.3)
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] --- Detected GPUs ---
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#0: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#1: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#2: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] GPU#3: ?
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06]
[19:20:16 - 0 days 00:00:06] Press 'q' to exit application
August 01, 2018, 01:41:14 AM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner?Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
-I or --intensity - Intensity of GPU scanning (23 for high end cards, 20 for low end).
For example, RX480 -I 21
Please forgive me for misleading you. Yes, lyclMiner uses the worksize parameter; for Vega 64 use WorkSize = "16777216".
July 30, 2018, 04:20:52 AM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner?Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
-I or --intensity - Intensity of GPU scanning (23 for high end cards, 20 for low end).
For example, RX480 -I 21
July 29, 2018, 05:48:37 PM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner?Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
-I or --intensity - Intensity of GPU scanning (23 for high end cards, 20 for low end).
For example, RX480 -I 21
July 29, 2018, 03:59:54 PM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner?Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
-I or --intensity - Intensity of GPU scanning (23 for high end cards, 20 for low end).
For example, RX480 -I 21
July 29, 2018, 03:36:47 PM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner?Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
-I or --intensity - Intensity of GPU scanning (23 for high end cards, 20 for low end).
For example, RX480 -I 21
July 29, 2018, 02:26:20 PM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Is there a way to set intensity in this miner? Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
July 26, 2018, 03:50:01 AM
mkxminer is vary stable.
July 19, 2018, 10:06:33 AM
Have you used any non-reference Vega cards? I'm curious because I do not have a reference card. I have an ASUS ROG OC 64, MSI Air Boost OC 64, & Sapphire Nitro+ OC 64. Hashing power is about the same on all three, while the ASUS does a little better on power consumption. I would be curious how the reference cards compare on power consumption.
I've not used any no, non-reference should run cooler, so many the gpu die would overclock better. But generally your hashrate will be identical to mine if you run your gpu core at the same speed. The only question would be if you would be stable at that speed at the same voltage level.
July 19, 2018, 09:46:51 AM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
What hashrates and power draw are you getting? This miner keeps freezing my cards, wonder if I need to optimize or the miner is just buggy
I've got 2 cards at 1360mhz / 875mv gpu core getting 75mh/s
My other 4 cards at 1300mhz / 890mv gpu core getting 70mh/s
All vega 64s
The system with all the cards is pulling 1500watts from the wall.
Also you have to use 18.5.1 adrenalin drivers or newer, the blockchain drivers won't work for me.
Thanks for posting your OC settings and results. I'm curious about your settings for different cards if they are all Vega 64s. Are they from different manufacturers? I have 3 Vega 64s and one Vega 56, not all the same. Can you let us know which OC settings apply to which cards?
They're all vega64, all reference blower cards, and all from the same manufacturer. Different gpu cores just overclock or undervolt better than others, it's the silicone lottery.
Since then I've turned down all cards to 1300mhz for long term better stability, but still running at those voltages. They're getting about 72mh/s each now with the newest version of the Lyclminer.
Have you used any non-reference Vega cards? I'm curious because I do not have a reference card. I have an ASUS ROG OC 64, MSI Air Boost OC 64, & Sapphire Nitro+ OC 64. Hashing power is about the same on all three, while the ASUS does a little better on power consumption. I would be curious how the reference cards compare on power consumption.
July 19, 2018, 07:30:30 AM
How to make it work with nicehash ?
Just connect to nicehash lyra2Z stratum server.
But I'm not sure about that. I'm never use nicehash.
I try to set up at MRR and its works
Do you not mean Lyra2rev2? Miner does not work on nicehash so don't bother.
July 15, 2018, 11:41:56 PM
How to make it work with nicehash ?
Just connect to nicehash lyra2Z stratum server.
But I'm not sure about that. I'm never use nicehash.
I try to set up at MRR and its works
July 15, 2018, 09:13:56 PM
what instruments did downvolt use?
July 15, 2018, 11:52:53 AM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
What hashrates and power draw are you getting? This miner keeps freezing my cards, wonder if I need to optimize or the miner is just buggy
I've got 2 cards at 1360mhz / 875mv gpu core getting 75mh/s
My other 4 cards at 1300mhz / 890mv gpu core getting 70mh/s
All vega 64s
The system with all the cards is pulling 1500watts from the wall.
Also you have to use 18.5.1 adrenalin drivers or newer, the blockchain drivers won't work for me.
Thanks for posting your OC settings and results. I'm curious about your settings for different cards if they are all Vega 64s. Are they from different manufacturers? I have 3 Vega 64s and one Vega 56, not all the same. Can you let us know which OC settings apply to which cards?
They're all vega64, all reference blower cards, and all from the same manufacturer. Different gpu cores just overclock or undervolt better than others, it's the silicone lottery.
Since then I've turned down all cards to 1300mhz for long term better stability, but still running at those voltages. They're getting about 72mh/s each now with the newest version of the Lyclminer.
July 12, 2018, 09:53:01 AM
I see that there is a new open-source miner for Lyra2REv2 on AMD cards now: https://github.com/CryptoGraphics/lyclMiner
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
Performance seems better for me too 10%-15% faster at same settings on my Vega 64 cards, is mkxminer gonna be updated with code from this?
What hashrates and power draw are you getting? This miner keeps freezing my cards, wonder if I need to optimize or the miner is just buggy
I've got 2 cards at 1360mhz / 875mv gpu core getting 75mh/s
My other 4 cards at 1300mhz / 890mv gpu core getting 70mh/s
All vega 64s
The system with all the cards is pulling 1500watts from the wall.
Also you have to use 18.5.1 adrenalin drivers or newer, the blockchain drivers won't work for me.
Thanks for posting your OC settings and results. I'm curious about your settings for different cards if they are all Vega 64s. Are they from different manufacturers? I have 3 Vega 64s and one Vega 56, not all the same. Can you let us know which OC settings apply to which cards?
Jump to: