Topic: 🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com - page 102. (Read 119079 times)

Still no one that thinks its martingle strategy thats hitting the bankroll the past days?

Sadly this doesnt work in each case it seems...

but at least you will get them back after some time.
You could basically get "lucky" and few btc get stuck somewhere and when youre old and bitcoin is worth few bucks you get them back. Hopefully wont die because of a heartattack then XD

True , if your transaction doesn't get confirmed within 48 hours , then the client will reject it and you will receive your btc back in your wallet . But also , yes the confirmation takes a lot of time , Although i send a standard fee of 10k sats , sometimes i need to wait for more than a hour to recieve the coins.

The client is supposed to reject/return after 48h...

Honestly those transaction will never confirm. I actually had to make a node forget a transaction because I sent a fee that was like 1/10th the regular fee by accident. Took about 2-3 weeks to get those BTC back.

What about self-exclude option for desired app for desired time-frame?

lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network".
I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum.

I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.

So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.

I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:

0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...

Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.

Any promos for announced ?

Sometimes it's just best to ignore inflammatory, provocative, and passive-aggressive language, and I will choose to do so now. I'm obviously not the only one who has noticed it, and I have to give the MP staff much credit for dealing with the more...difficult...users.

"Those that yell the loudest and most often rarely have anything to say."

Its about time someone speaks up for his hostility for the MP team. He needs to realize that he is the one needing MP not the other way around. Besides that, more player means the site is growing, MP is growing with more userbase and it is better to have more player in the future then same player betting with 100 tabs or so

you are the hostile one and I am glad to live in a BCT democracy where everyone can talk freely and defend himself against hostile people like you. we don't attack anyone but we will always defend us

I am asking legit questions. what rules did we break or circumvent? that you are not allowing multiple tab betting that is your own decision and it is not ruled by MP and if MP would have a rule for this they need to tell us how to prevent users to open multiple tabs and we were never told how to do this

The difference between 1 player with ten tabs and ten players with one tab is that ten players have ten bankrolls

lol ten players (= 1 player with 10 accounts)have ten bank rolls wow great news! I know players who have enough BR to fill 100 tabs

MMM rule Many Players = Many bets = More Profit

enjoy your day and try to chill (learned this word = chill)

The hostility here is uncalled for. Also, you seem hell-bent on circumventing the rules put in place, so much so that you take an enforcement of the rules as approval of rulebreaking. If I were DogeDigital, I'd turn off your app permanently for abuse.

Here's a lesson for you: when you have an app that causes everybody else's game to go slower, you aren't bringing more business, your driving it away. The difference between 1 player with ten tabs and ten players with one tab is that ten players have ten bankrolls.

LuckyBit Micro will never allow multiple-tab betting.

let me also be frank and clear
so if the problem was solved why are you giving your opinion here now? sounds fishy and brown nosed

isn't it to late now and if you can't read I will explain to you in simple words what I asked and MP owner's answer

I asked a very legit question how many tabs a user may open during his wagering. (you can't understand this question because you are not an app owner)

MP owner answered me in a very strong way and bold
We do NOT want users to open up multiple tabs to bet.

I asked again because the answer was not satisfying at all. (nothing new for me to get no answer or an unsatisfying answer from MP owners)

now what a surprise! MP owner is posting the answer for my question not direct to me but for all ( I post it for you in Bold for your better understanding)
Thanks to the hard work of our lead developer, we now have Moneypot setup so that a cap of 10 bets and/or requests per authid (confidential apps)/access token (client apps) is set...............With this in effect, players can now open multiple tabs if they wish, but will be capped at 10 bets per second per site.


if my question for how many tabs was not legit why would the head dev of MP implement this option?
easy answer because players are opening anyway multiple tabs and and we can't hinder them (I am speaking not about our customers but all MP app customers)

but with a clear rule we could at least give the rule out and let the MP users know not to use more than xxx tabs

but luckily the head dev knows exactly what we are talking about and knew that there must be a solution for this problem and did all he can to find a solution. and he found a solution and as we know him he will try to solve this problem in the best way possible because he is a perfectionist. Chapeau!

and as you are not an app owner I will give you another lesson

MMM rule Many Players = Many bets = More Profit

how can a casino reach MMM? yes the casino needs to allow players to open all tabs they want or even use as many user names they like (many are doing this) and let them wager wager wager....

what is the difference between a player who opens 10 tabs to wager and 10 players with one tab and wager?

But is it okay for an app owner to create a few identical apps (each with a different app ID of course) and to suggest the players to use these apps simultaneously? I would not be surprised to see people doing that to bypass the new restriction.

To be frank and clear, the MP owner answered you and very specifically said only 1 tab was allowed, and so this hostile tone towards oHnK seems very unnecessary to me. He was simply restating the answer that you apparently missed.

Additionally, it's now a moot point with the latest site updates/upgrades as mentioned by Dogedigital.

yeah sorry i still refer to bustabit as the old moneypot mehh my bad