Topic: More Epochs mod v1.1 for Claymore ETH miner 15. Epochs 385+ work, New Version! - page 6. (Read 5810 times)

anybody here can tell me with the R9 390 8gb WHAT IS THE actual AVERAGE hashrate for ETH? ...using what miner and overclocked or not? ill appreciate that info!!! thanks

If you pair them in a system with a 8GB 470/570 then they will mine but at a reduced hashrate. Best I could get on my 470 4gb cards was 11 MH/s using 1.5

did you solve issue with closed 5555 port? I'll release new version soon with workaround.

4 gb GPUs aren't supported due to lack of video memory for holding 4+ gb DAG for current and future epochs.

any indicative hashrate with 4 gb cards  rx 470/570?

New Version just released!


Changelog:

~ Fixed issue with incorrect shares on Navi AMD GPUs. Other AMD GPUs will be addressed in next versions of the mod.

If you don't use AMD Navi GPUs, you can stay on older versions of the mod.

hi, probably ssl port 5555 is closed by your internet provider. If you are mining to ethermine, original miner would try to use ssl connection to mine
devfee there too. I can change this in next versions of the mod if you won't be able to solve the problem with port 5555 on your side.

hi
in Iran dev fee doesn't work properly

all miner work good except this miner

DevFee: ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eu1.ethermine.org' <172.65.207.106> port 5555 (SSL/TLS)
ETH: 02/03/21-14:28:52 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.800 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.793 Mh/s, GPU1 38.815 Mh/s, GPU2 38.772 Mh/s, GPU3 30.420 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:28:56 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.858 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.793 Mh/s, GPU1 38.836 Mh/s, GPU2 38.828 Mh/s, GPU3 30.401 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:28:59 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.748 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.806 Mh/s, GPU1 38.773 Mh/s, GPU2 38.751 Mh/s, GPU3 30.419 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:28:59 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.748 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.806 Mh/s, GPU1 38.773 Mh/s, GPU2 38.751 Mh/s, GPU3 30.419 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:29:03 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.870 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.783 Mh/s, GPU1 38.834 Mh/s, GPU2 38.818 Mh/s, GPU3 30.435 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:29:07 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.793 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.793 Mh/s, GPU1 38.794 Mh/s, GPU2 38.772 Mh/s, GPU3 30.434 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:29:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.643 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.784 Mh/s, GPU1 38.764 Mh/s, GPU2 38.726 Mh/s, GPU3 30.370 Mh/s
ETH: 02/03/21-14:29:09 - New job from eu1.ethermine.org:4444
ETH - Total Speed: 137.643 Mh/s, Total Shares: 158, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:20
ETH: GPU0 29.784 Mh/s, GPU1 38.764 Mh/s, GPU2 38.726 Mh/s, GPU3 30.370 Mh/s
ETH: Stratum - Cannot connect to eu1.ethermine.org:5555
DevFee: ETH: Stratum - Failed to connect, retry in 20 sec...

Should work fine.

thanks, ill be waiting anxiously.. .good vibes!

Thanks. That makes sense, let's hope problem will be solved.

I see, I'm working on solution to get rid of incorrect shares for AMD Gpus. If you have many incorrect shares for your AMD Gpu and some other miner works well for you,  of course you should use it. When I'll solve the problem I will release new version of my mod (probably as separate release for AMD Gpus because Nvidia Gpus work fine already) and you will be able to test it and decide what is best for you.

Thanks for your hard work,
If claymore will NOT work with straps then there is no point to use it. i used clay only because of this, with 3rd party software all miner works fast, the point is claymore was single miner with all settings you need, make bat file thats it.you dont need oc software or mod the bios.

With -straps 0 yes I get accepted shares, but I would say about 1/2 -2/3 are "incorrect share". I've also tried stock clock settings instead of overclock since my OC's were set using the original straps, but even at stock clocks I still get mostly "incorrect shares" so my effective hash is probably 1/3 of what it used to be. Is this something you think you'll be able to get working, or should I look at using a different miner for my AMD's?

With -straps 0 do you have accepted shares? Do you have shares that didn't pass check on CPU? ("got incorrect share" message in log file)

About crashing with -straps 1. The miner uses heavily protected custom kernel-mode driver to apply straps and it looks like it's not compatible with new amd gpu drivers. I think the only realistic solution for me is to use some 3rd party driver to apply straps instead of default miner's driver. Still this will require a lot of researching and therefore time.

Hello, thanks I'm fine, just busy investigating the issue with rejected shares for AMD gpus. If I'll solve the problem, I will try to add support for 390.

I upgraded to AMD driver 20.7.2 and while I now can get it to run with my RX580's and Vega56, I'm having the exact same problem as batsonxl - if I have straps set to 1 or whichever straps I'd previously used, the whole rig crashes the moment it tries to applies the straps. If I set it to 0, it will start up and run, but probably with around a 35% reduction in hashrate as the straps aren't being applied. Hopefully straps can get working again for AMD's? Thanks

hi, hope your fine.
ok, so the question is... have you the plan to make support for R9 390 8GB (HAWAII) or not? .. .thanks

The problem is in AMD drivers, you can read more here https://github.com/ethereum-mining/ethminer/issues/1966, the solution is here https://github.com/ethereum-mining/ethminer/issues/1966#issuecomment-663826059

So you need newer AMD driver, 20.7.2 or later. Then GPU will be able to allocate more than 4gb of vram in single chunk.

No, I don't know his driver version. But you told me your driver version, so I will check if this version will give me wrong vram size too.



Yes, probably same issue. If I'll find the workaround I'll inform about it here.