I have inherited a 290 and 290x, can the Stilt BIOS apply to 290X too?
There was a different but very similar series of TheStilt bios for the 290x.
I'm not saying you SHOULD use the highest-voltage TheStilt bios - I just haven't had the time to play around with the lower-voltage options, and the current setup is working so much better than stock was I'm not real inclined to mess with it 'till I get other higher-priority stuff done - like my current MOVE....
Power consumption did seem to go up - but on the STOCK bios the things thermal limited like crazy, ran consistantly at 94c AND UNDERCLOCKED THEMSELVES to stay there (ballpark 850 core on some of them) and consistanty hashed at more like 20-22Mh/s - and I was seeing more like 250 watts power consumption even WITH the bios-imposed thermal-driven underclock.
With TheStilt bios, they're running more like 80c AND I can clock them at 1100/1250 and get 29-30 MH/s hashrate, but they appear to be consuming about 300 watts - so they ARE running more efficiently, just need more power to support the major overclock (stock clock on my Sapphire reference design is 947 core).
IME and per a LOT of comments from other folks that had similar issues the 16.x AMD drivers are NOT good for mining - stick with 15.12 or 15.7 (I think I'm running 15.12 on my R9-based machines).
R9 290 and R9 290x should coexist without issues in the same machine. I've got a couple rigs running a R9 290 and a R9 280x without problems - as long as the cards are same or very close generation (don't mix GCN and pre-GCN for example) and can use the same driver version they should run fine together.
From what I've seen posted around though, the R9 290x isn't any faster at Ethereum mining than the R9 290 and consumes a little more power - but since they're inherited it's not really an issue, I just wouldn't pay the premium for a R9 290x over a R9 290 with the expectation of getting higher hashrate/earnings.