Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 437. (Read 661525 times)

just read,  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--454001   funny guy   

Relax, this things is only a couple of weeks old, and you're acting as if you hired this team to do a personal project for you. You're yelling at them as if you're their boss and they're beneath you. Like I always say, be grateful for the opportunity that you know about a project that has potential. To me you sound worse than a person with multiple stakes.

Here I am grateful for this group, while here's a person that sound so arrogant. Don't know if you are and you just sound that way, but truly worse than someone with 10+ stakes. Unless that person also has a similar character.

Yes, well said.  The first pages people had to do nothing.  Anyone who had multiple accounts could sign them all up and now they are not being questioned.  These are the guys who showed the least dedication.  They invested nothing so they care not if it fails.  Unfortunately some people are not able to read bitcointalk.org constantly so they had to invest money instead.

This place is pump and dump central.  There must had been lots of guys with multiple accounts ready to go.  So all the shady dudes who invested nothing but the labor for 1 login (to post) are able to have unlimited stakes at beginning.  This witchhunt will do little.  I think rules have been laid down and are adequate.  Anyone spending 4 hours just to make first post to then pay for stake seems fairly dedicated to me.  Yet we ignore guys who did nothing but post under their already existing multiaccounts.

I think if you guys found someone who had 50 stakes or something then yes you should refund stakes.  However I am not sure how you do this outside the rules.  It is either taint analysis or IP checking.   How far do you go with taint analysis ? Then you start accusing people.  Pretty much definition of a witchhunt.

Instead you could be productive.  Figure out how to make this coin succeed.  Make scammers work for their stakes, but just don't spend too much time going on about this.  

I hope you guys doing all this extra work get dev stakes.

That´s right. FrictionlessCoin, stop trolling in the NEM thread. Jealous?

Reason: violating other member's right to privacy in a public forum. Following this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nem-4-billions-coins-part-1-this-thread-is-no-longer-used-422129
0.03 btc is refunded to the sending address in the following this transaction https://blockchain.info/tx-index/280a984c9f09d2a2e3dc42fc7f27495e93967ffac87a989965e019513945

Don't you have better things to do than hang around here ? Like working on your own project ?

Dude... he was just asking some basic questions!

Not going to be critical of how you run your fund raising,  but you should be a bit more tolerant of your investors.

I am not asking for a fully functional product here.
As an investor, I want to see how you are progressing with the 'parallel development'.
What have you achieved so far? Any screen shots or source code to share?
If you are doing development, you must be developing it against some spec or white paper right?
Could you be kind enough to share it?

Also your development team, they dont have any deadline at all?
So this thing could take years then?

How long you think is - Be patient ?

If you are doing it for the first 20 pages of people, who entered it for free, then you take as much time as you want.
You have taken my money and now you are sitting on top of +40 bitcoins, from similar people like me.
So I am looking for some answers here.

Reason: violating other member's right to privacy in a public forum. Following this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nem-4-billions-coins-part-1-this-thread-is-no-longer-used-422129
0.03 btc is refunded to the sending address in the following this transaction https://blockchain.info/tx-index/280a984c9f09d2a2e3dc42fc7f27495e9396dfcb7ffac87a989965e019513945

It is called a
market opportunity.
Buy now, that is cheap. Would you rather wait for .001 to double your stake?

instant justice!  Judge, jury and executioner!

Dude... he was just asking some basic questions!

Not going to be critical of how you run your fund raising,  but you should be a bit more tolerant of your investors.

Reason: violating other member's right to privacy in a public forum. Following this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-nem-4-billions-coins-part-1-this-thread-is-no-longer-used-422129
0.03 btc is refunded to the sending address in the following this transaction https://blockchain.info/tx-index/280a984c9f09d2a2e3dc42fc7f27495e9396dfcb7ffac87a989965e019513945

and the reason for refunding my money is......
I asked some tough questions???

Anyway I thought you are just one another stakeholder in this whole project.
I asked these questions on behalf of the community and if the community decides to refund me , please go ahead.
Otherwise as a stake holder I need reasons and I want to know what I did wrong.

Egalitarian, no dictator, for the community bla bla bla , my a$$.
Open your eyes and see what you are doing now.

later.

and the reason for refunding my money is......
I asked some tough questions???

Anyway I thought you are just one another stakeholder in this whole project.
I asked these questions on behalf of the community and if the community decides to refund me , please go ahead.
Otherwise as a stake holder I need reasons and I want to know what I did wrong.

Egalitarian, no dictator, for the community bla bla bla , my a$$.
Open your eyes and see what you are doing now.

later.

This is not an IPO. It is a call to building a community. And you are no longer welcome. I exercise the right of the development team to change fundraising term in the disclaimer and refund you the money.