Im well aware that Im under suspicion, I have no BTT history and I made account on BTT only beacuse I heard of NEM. But I totally dont care, because I sent money to utopianfuture and that way I made a deal. I accepted conditions of SOCIAL CONTRACT which is the first post in this threat. I have nothing to fear, but you guys.
You really seem to not be able to grasp tha fact, that making multiple accounts and buy multiple times is allowed. Whats wrong with you? It is part of that social contract. And now you come here saying things like, give us ID or you wont get NEM.
You are turning it in SCAM. Your ideas are actually more dangerous to NEM than hoarders. Can you imagine how angry those people will be when they wont get their 5 or 10 stakes they paid for, based on the fact that buying multiple stakes is ALLOWED. They will be swarming against NEM, You promised them something and then you change it, that is not how "fair" is done.
And really how rational it is to persecuate people with multiple buyins, knowing that any rich person ...any Nxt stakeholder will have no problem to buy millions of NEM from exchange or other stakeholders after NEM is released. What you gonna do with it?
Will there be some central planning? Will you forbid reach people to buy 10 percent of NEM when price will go down?
I just dont see any point in what you guys are trying to do.
And you can think Im sockpuppet scammer guy with bad english, but my points are valid.
There is a maximum of two transactions from one address as well as specifically mentioned anti sockpuppet measures. The reason I throw around ideas is, that NXT is under some heavy and fully reasonable criticism concerning it's distribution.
If NEM starts and there will be people with a considerable percentage of all held coins, it will get the same criticism. This is something I personally would like to avoid.
The better the distribution of a coin the more trust can be put into it.
I have to admit though, that all current ideas I have brought forth are attackable in some way. Either it is connected to too much trust, is not specific enough or doesn't work out for all people. You can't satisfy everyone on the other hand. Thats reality. Someone will be left out. Always.
It would be nice to hear a well working idea though. Or maybe even the sentiment that everyone should just get as much as they pay and let them pay as much as they want.