Topic: Neo & Bee talk (spam free thread) - page 15. (Read 262056 times)

Only those notices approved for public dissemination appear on this website (the full list of Notices is available to authorized users via INTERPOL's Information System).

@blackkys: No, no, I meant link to Interpol involvement in Danny's case.

http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted

can't find his name in the list of red listed

http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Notices

Could you give me a link?  I didn't know Interpol was involved.

Since "he knows" that an arrest warrant for criminal charges has been issued by the Cyprus police and he hasn't return, he is making his position worse day after day.

Also European and International arrest warrants have been issued together with an Interpol Red Notice. Do you know what this means?

^Nah.  Unless you know something I don't, there is no warrant out for Danny outside of Cyprus.  He's not in Cyprus, so...
Even if he was "caught" by the Cypriots (for this to happen, Danny would have to be stupid enough to return to Cyprus), he wouldn't be thrown in jail, much more likely arrested and released just like Charlie Shrem.  

No matter how many months or years pass, Brewster will be brought to justice. He cannot escape and be on the hide for the rest of his life.

The longer he avoids the arrest warrant, the more serious his crime becomes and the longer will be his sentence.

Any news?

User @source101 appears to know Mr. Brewster since before he went to Cyprus, and his unique informations have not been shown to be incorrect yet:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/source101-301800

Besides describing Mr. Brewster's background and (lack of) qualifications he offers some interesting points:
1. Mr. Brewster's cars were being shipped out of Cyprus (2014-03-25 08:55:16).
2. Mr. Brewster and his fiancée were still in Cyprus shortly before Mar/30 (2014-03-30 04:57:00)
3. This is the third time that Mr. Brewster set up a business that failed (2014-03-30, 05:48:32)

Point 1 is interesting only because other posts have claimed that the cars were being sold in Cyprus. ("The Bentley was spotted in a dealership with changed plates" -- Hm, how did that poster know that it was the same Bentley?)

Point 2 is surprising since many people were already looking for him at the time, weren't they?  However it may not contradict the employees' accounts; I don't recall whether they claimed that he left Cyprus much before the 30th.

Point 3 is interesting because, if true, it is just amazing how that fact could have gone ignored for so long.

source101

Re: NEO and BEE talk (unmoderated)

April 24, 2014, 12:58:01 PM

Quote from: CAFE NEO on April 18, 2014, 06:09:34 AM

What is he doing now??

Mr Brewster is staying with his Grandmother in the Yorkshire area. You are all correct in saying there was no funeral that he attended, this was just another lie to spin. I wonder do you carry a book that you write everything you say down Danny? You do know that your past does always comes back to bite you. You wanted fame and fortune and now Danny you google your name and arrest warrants and you have fame for all the wrong reasons.

Danny stand up and face what you have done, return the lavish items you bought with company funds. Tell the truth, that your bit coin knowledge is as much as a 5yr old you just went with your ideas at a bull at a gate. Tell the truth that you used the companies money to live. tell the truth the there was NO 6 million euro of your own funds for start up. Tell the truth and have an independent account go over all accounts.

For once in your life be honest, you might actually free yourself of some heavy weight. Just think of your family and the stress that all this is putting them through. think of others for once nit just the selfish sole of yourself.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=553869.280

This person "source 101" in the past has revealed a lot of information about Danny Brewster on the Bitcointalk forum, information that subsequently proved correct e.g. he/she has cautioned well in advance that Danny was getting ready to run away, that his cars were missing etc.

Now he is revealing interesting information about the "funeral that Danny had to attend" and where he is currently hiding.

Read his posts on [Suspicious link removed]ince March25th here starting from page 180.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289730.3580

All the stuff you mentioned is like steps x y and z as to why this thing went down the tubes. You should be concentrating on steps a-w, because x, y, and z wouldn't have happened without those.

Why were the ipo coins that were needed for the business stupidly sitting in the exchanges? Why did a guy running a company that saw the warning sings about gox stupidly lose so many of his personal coins? Where did all the coins that were not stupidly lost go? Why did he take money from people and not give them coins? Why did they spend so much on advertising and a fancy branch opening without any products ready to go/use?

Let me be blunt:
By suggesting that you are Danny's friend or a relative, people are giving you the benefit of the doubt.  The only other possibilities open at this time, now that Danny has ran away with your coin and NEOBEE shares are worth about as much as the paper they're not printed on, are these:

1)  You're mentally challenged, differently-enabled, or whatever the term de jure is for "dumber than dirt."

2)  You're the worst pumper evah, and just don't know when to quit.

As far as your bolded complaints, i'll address them again:

a) "black-market trade":  As far as adults are concerned, an unlicenced Panamanian intertubes exchange *IS* blackmarket trade.

b) The fact that Havelock clearly manipulated the listing  Manipulation?  On MY unlicenced Panamanian exchange??!!  Jesus no!  Next you'll tell me that Three Card Monte games are rigged!

c) the fact that TAT bailed the boat the very moment the btcapples made his trade here See (b).

So... Yah.
Danny ran away with your coin.
We told you he would.
You knew better.
Here we are

Again, I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you're just a clueless "investor" and not a part of this ...whatever it is.

Not obsessed at all. I'm pointing out that you jump to conclusions too soon.
I just dont think that the way you try to rationalise everything makes any sense at all.
I find it interesting that anyone in this thread criticizing the sheer amount of FUD layed out by the troll crew
has to be a "family" or a "friend" or somehow related to brewster.

I also find interesting the fact that only a handfull of accounts are taking this to personal levels, like you and a couple of other inter-thread famous accounts.

Or, the "asking for evidence is guilt" attitude you carry. Even with all of the N&B staff coming out and making statements,
nothing is actually confirmed from the mountain of allegations. Peopleare crying over spilt milk, but from what we know according to
staff members and brewsters' posts, 2 people have filed complaints, and nothing more.

Even the so called warrant, is based on somebody complaining about what?
Nobody knows exactly. That did not stop the troll crew to keep screaming.

Yet, you and the troll crew, seem to be avoiding to discuss on the dirty part of this story.

The black-market trade that btcapples started and tanked the price, with him selling in here below market
and his buyers moving it to havelock for quick profits.
The fact that Havelock clearly manipulated the listing, taking it out for a ride on their own, as soon as they saw they could do it,
the fact that TAT bailed the boat the very moment the btcapples made his trade here and NB asked their listing be frozen

and a few more.
I am merely focusing on the fact that a certain number of accounts are fixated on brewster.
Not on resolving anything regarding NB.

So, is it ok to name the big merchant that Danny said he was in ongoing talks with, or is it old known news now?

I did not "accuse" you, I thought you were connected to them, rather than just their customer. And I apologized immediately for the mistake.  So what?

This is insane.  What the media wrote about Neo & Bee has been confirmed beyond any reasonable doubt.  You insulted me because I believed those reports, insulted me because I asked about the background of a person being sought by the police -- and now you accuse me of a crime?  I am the bad guy in this story?

What is happening? Why are you so obsessed about me?  Is it strange for someone to be interested in knowing the details of an attempt to swindle an entire country?

I must ask again, are you a relative or close friend of Danny? I can't make sense of your posts otherwise...

(By the way, I am not interested on Danny's  current whereabouts - that is the police's job. I never asked where is his daughter; Danny himself said he left her in Cyprus.  And I am still interested in what he did before going to Cyprus.)

I'm not sure that there are any explicit laws against a 'private money' in the UK and if there were Bitcoin could not be put into such an illegal class as it is a global decentralized digital currency - laws to actively ban BTC do not exist because it is a new and unique technology.

Having said that it seems this article wound suggest a private currency/money tag would benifit not hinder Bitcoin:

http://www.coindesk.com/uk-tax-authority-hmrc-reclassify-bitcoin-private-currency/

The proposition is that Governments do not want to ban digital currency but tax and control it which is a far more effective control. If they tried to ban BTC at this point without sufficient cause there would be a huge backlash and their attempts would be very unpopular. Which is why failures like NB provided regulators and legislators with the perfect conditions to implement popular and restrictive controls.  

Tuur = Belgian gubmint. Also EU gubmint because he's based in Brussels like the EU and also the EU president Von Rompuy is a Belgian. 

What do you find hard to believe? You seemed to believe any kind of rumour relatively easy, without doing any reasonable fact checking yourself, let alone the coinpress you so much and blindly trust.

Aren;t you the one that sent me a pm accusing me of working/owning moolah? Yes you were.
Why did you do that? Because facts don;t really matter i guess, and its easier to accuse that actually research.

How long did it take you to verify the nonsense you pulled out of your mouth? Not much. Because you did not.

Are you not the one that was accusing whoever asked for evidence, of lying, in the same post you were asking for evidence on Brewsters whereabouts? Yes, that was your hypocritical bidding. But you believed its ok for you to ask for evidence, its bad for others to do so

Your "academic" interest in the speculative nature of an unregulated market is quite interesting to watch.
You have not "invested" in this, but you are looking for him and his daughter, which looks like.. personal issues here too?
Looks like you are part of the team that layed the threats, you know, the same team the HighCourt is allegedly looking for.