Author

Topic: New Official AMT Thread - page 113. (Read 149472 times)

sr. member
Activity: 267
Merit: 250
Stan the Man!
May 06, 2014, 04:33:10 PM
Rik: You said it's good AMT is trying to solve these problems instead of "going out of business" because if they do so "people won't receive a dime".

This is pure unfounded bullshit.

A judge can demand garnishment the wages of those responsible to get the plaintiffs paid back. They can also take control of their assets in order for these monies to be paid back.

You all have become so desperate for a solution from AMT, you are about to let them get away with not delivering on what they promised.

Believe it or not, I'm sure they will walk away with money in their pockets from this "solution" for you all. AMT wants you to believe they are going bankrupt, and will do whatever it takes to appease their customers. I am not buying it for one second. I think if the reality was that AMT was hemorrhaging money, they would've already claimed bankruptcy.

They are simply trying for a solution that let's them keep some profits, and keep you all from continuing to pursue legal action and hold them accountable for this fraud.

Better off letting the courts decide what should happen. This will likely award you all for being decepted, as well as keeping AMT from ripping off new clients in the future.

Interesting how they are offering a "hosted mining solution" for some of you, yet they claim they don't mine. I wonder how they are going to go about mining for customers then. Oh wait, I know! They've been mining all along with whatever working hardware they DO have. They just sent all the non working/miners with issues to customers.

the last paragraph is awesome.  why any of you would EVER consider sending them MORE money, on top of what you've already lost is beyond me.  you like getting screwed so much, that you're going back for 2nds or 3rds?  

you've got to be out of your cotton pickin mind to continue a business relationship with these guys.  

AMT, sorry about the health and other issues, but you are obligated to give the people what they've paid for, or give them their money back.  Kudos to a creative solution to try to suck more money out of them.  shit happens, take your lumps and pay up.
sr. member
Activity: 267
Merit: 250
Stan the Man!
May 06, 2014, 04:29:20 PM
Amt-
I understand that you're trying to keep it simple and I appreciate the honesty. I would however like to ask about the MPP, a reason why I chose to buy from AMT in the first place. I can purchase a 1th machine for now around $3,000. $6,000 was a fair price to pay when I ordered back in January and I understand that. I expected miners almost 2 months ago and did not receive. I have lost money waiting this long and would like some resolution. I understand how hard it is and everything that is going on, I really do. All I ask is for 100% honesty. If there is no MPP like stated, well fine. At least I'd like to know that to help me better decide what I'd like to do with my $12,000 investment.

My question exactly.  with the changing MPP story, I'm getting close to the newly stated "mine with your machine for 6 months, and if it hasn't ROI'd we'll upgrade" point.  which is complete and utter BS, but still, which one is it?  the falsely advertised one, or the new one that was made up to buy another 6 months?

The MAIN reason i made my purchase, was because of the MPP.  putting such an offer as a selling point, and then not following through on it is a perfect example of false advertising.

i started this post with the intention of being nice, since  the "nice" people  people get preferential treatment over those that make noise about wanting to get what they've paid for.  which also is complete BS.  

I really feel for you guys that are on the hook for many thousands of dollars.

the MPP was the only thing that made the extra cost of these miners "seem" like they would be worth it, and they are showing no signs of making good on that promise.  what does that say?

The new plan they've laid out is less than palatable.  I'd shit myself if that's what i was being told were the options for my $6000 spent.
If thy still have your money, they are using it to further their business, instead of making good to the orders already placed.  Why not ship what's been paid for, zero out the obligations and start over with what's left, if any.  if nothing left, then walk away and lick your wounds.

do the right thing AMT.  for once.  so far, not so good.

legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 04:29:00 PM
The people wanting miners now with the current hardware design are in for a game of Russian roulette as the miner could just as easily go bad or be bad leaving the assembly plant. I already had that experience. So has pretty much everyone else here. At this point getting hardware that works in my hands is all I care about. 1.2Ths of working hardware at this point would be nice. Since I ordered 2 miners I would obviously expect 2.4Ths of working hardware. But like I said if they go the route of getting us equivalent hardware and are able to save a few bucks going that route AND gets it to us fast...that would settle things really quick for them on alot of levels and we all get to move on. Lawsuit goes out the door (and sends a big fuck you to clenell with all your spamming insults in my inbox over my comments).

There's no way to predict what the end game is going to be here.

Yeah,  I guess it sucks to have $12,000 worth of equipment that does absolutely nothing.

Well,  I feel half or your pain.  I have $6,000 worth of equipment sitting doing nothing in my basement.

Anyone want to buy this junk from me?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 03:58:57 PM

The problem is for them that's not legally viable. They need to fulfill at least the bare minimum on this or else it will be a much worse for them. Realistically they have the hardware already to reassemble. They have options to make this get turned around. chips is more expensive for everyone but them. and that is not acceptable. Might be for you so you can go that route. They were talking to you about the 40+10 options. You were trying to milk them for more than that and that is why that option was shut down...dont misrepresent the situation. They accepted, you just decided to take advantage for more of them and they declined as they can really as its their option.

Realistically speaking we know we are not getting refunds at this point....so if we have to settle on something then its to get WORKING hardware we paid for regardless of the source. If they want to truly make it up to us then getting us more THs for the money we paid would go a long way to addressing the already damaged customer relations situation they have here.



Milk them for more?  I asked for 40+10 chips,  however, I did not accept that I ship back their miner first.   The logical thing to do since they have a habit of not accepting returns.

Ideally, we all want more THs for the money.  That would be inline with what was promised by the MPP.

However,  I have no idea of how many more months we all have to wait to receive hardware.        



And that's what my questions are for....a call to get them to answer exactly that. How long? Commitment to a timeline. And also what are they doing. Some transparency in the process will give us an idea realistically what they will be able to do and how long it will take. If they are going the technobit route why would you want chips? I saw your comments in there. They would be doing the same thing you would wind up having to pay for. OTOH if they are offering pre-assembled hardware like an S2 that would be a viable option that allows them to win moneywise and us with THs and getting what we paid for. Win-win. Far better than chips. I cant hash with chips nor am I interested in spending more money on mounting them on something. We should not have to have spent more money on any of this. But getting something back for the money we were forced to spend to make their hardware work (even out of spec) is something worthwhile. The 2x S2 to replace the 1.2Ths miner option gets us something (this presumes they actually consider this option).

The people wanting miners now with the current hardware design are in for a game of Russian roulette as the miner could just as easily go bad or be bad leaving the assembly plant. I already had that experience. So has pretty much everyone else here. At this point getting hardware that works in my hands is all I care about. 1.2Ths of working hardware at this point would be nice. Since I ordered 2 miners I would obviously expect 2.4Ths of working hardware. But like I said if they go the route of getting us equivalent hardware and are able to save a few bucks going that route AND gets it to us fast...that would settle things really quick for them on alot of levels and we all get to move on. Lawsuit goes out the door (and sends a big fuck you to clenell with all your spamming insults in my inbox over my comments).

The MPP can be fulfilled if not fully but at a lower cost. 2Ths over 500 bucks less than what we paid.....4Ths for those who bought 2 miners. Unless they have a considerably better arrangement its going to be hard to beat that. Bitmaintech also likley will provide bulk discounts so drives the price even lower. If they have the money to get teh chips reassembled they have the money to get new miners and settle this with everyone here right quick.

Hopefully we see a response from them soon on this.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 03:37:19 PM

The problem is for them that's not legally viable. They need to fulfill at least the bare minimum on this or else it will be a much worse for them. Realistically they have the hardware already to reassemble. They have options to make this get turned around. chips is more expensive for everyone but them. and that is not acceptable. Might be for you so you can go that route. They were talking to you about the 40+10 options. You were trying to milk them for more than that and that is why that option was shut down...dont misrepresent the situation. They accepted, you just decided to take advantage for more of them and they declined as they can really as its their option.

Realistically speaking we know we are not getting refunds at this point....so if we have to settle on something then its to get WORKING hardware we paid for regardless of the source. If they want to truly make it up to us then getting us more THs for the money we paid would go a long way to addressing the already damaged customer relations situation they have here.



Milk them for more?  I asked for 40+10 chips,  however, I did not accept that I ship back their miner first.   The logical thing to do since they have a habit of not accepting returns.

Ideally, we all want more THs for the money.  That would be inline with what was promised by the MPP.

However,  I have no idea of how many more months we all have to wait to receive hardware.         

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 03:29:36 PM
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 03:16:56 PM
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 06, 2014, 03:08:16 PM
AMT_miners, enough with the games and the hypotheticals and telling us to KEEP CALM! If your are going to do some thing TELL US WHAT IT IS AND JUST DO IT ALREADY!
legendary
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2703
Evil beware: We have waffles!
May 06, 2014, 03:07:26 PM
Snippet from SirMines everyones elses business, "THEY ARENT EVEN REGISTERED AS A U.S BUSINESS! They've been using Advanced Mining Technology's name, which is an actual mining company (other business) founded in the 80's. "

They are registered in Delaware: File Number:    5341525    Incorporation Date / Formation Date:    05/29/2013

There are several companies using the name Advanced Mining Technologies shown on a quick search, one in Australia, one in India and one in Canada as well as the one in PA. So what? As long as the 1st entity to claim the name doesn't bitch is all perfectly legal.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 03:00:55 PM
Hence my last post, getting two Antminer S2's at 2599 each would be 2Ths for us. And they pocket 500 bucks actually (I am correcting myself as its 5599). we paid alot of money for this hardware. They still have to deal with the logistics of getting the money back from the SMD house who fucked up their production. But that's not to put it coldly our problem. Ours is to get what we paid for. BUT if AMT wants to make this right with a minimal loss, going the S2 route for us would be the best. And I imagine buynig them in bulk results in some kind of discounts which mean they can pocket that discounted amount while still giving us the THs we paid for adn then some. We all win under this scenario. I presume 2199 based on the 4 dollar discounts they give for existing customers. Buying in bulk likely they would provide some discount there.

@AMT Hitting up bitmaintech for info might not be a bad idea to get this done. We all win here and you start to win credibility with delivery. You maintain yourself as a reseller. The rebuild of hardware might be more costly presuming not to mention time consuming. This would at least act as a stopgap until you can restructure or redevelop the hardware and come back stronger later on. But for now this might at least legally satisfy everyone here.

Buying Antminer rigs to compensate customers implies that they have the cash to buy them.

I don't think they have the cash,  all they have are a bunch of coincraft A1 chips and technobit boards.

I suggest you all take them up on the offer to get the coincraft A1 chips because it looks like they won't even have the money to assemble the technobit boards!

An assumption considering they collected quite a bit from all the orders. Sure some got spent on operating costs, but they should have money on hand. But the chips will involve more expense for us to get those assembled into a miner. We already paid out for the hardware. We have defective hardware for those that received it, at this point the burden is on them to give us working miners from someone not chips. That is a retarded compromise that absolves them of any responsibility and its costly for us on top of that. They win we lose huge. We would be paying 50 percent of the original miner cost just to get those turned into boards.....That is a huge loss. Did you take math at the midvale school for the gifted?

Notice how quick they were to grant your request to get you those chips. They know that is an advantage for them and a loss for you. You aren't just taking a "haircut" you are getting cut off at the knees. You essentially are paying close to 9k for 1.2ths if you count what you paid PLUS what you tack on for assembling the chips into a miner.

Personally getting the existing hardware replaced for working reliable and tested hardware (a community vetted vendor like technobit) OR if they bought up and provided us with replacements like S2s would be an acceptable settlement for everything. Depending on what option they are taking at this point. Honestly if they want to get us hardware quick and get this over with the S2 option would be the fastest. If they are assembling based on parts, then the technobit option (since they seem to be the only ones I know of doing this for the community) will take some more time that really is hurting us and them at the same time.

Point is all we want is the THs we paid for or better. We cant settle for broken hardware or compromises any more. It is not acceptable to anyone really. Would you pay for a hot dog and then haggle with the guy when he gives you half a hot dog or just the bun or just the hot dog with no bun? this is no different just on a different scale. We paid X for Y and should receive Y not Z or W. Plain and simple. I am not interested in the logistical hassle of getting chips assembled most people on here I dont think are either (chime in if you feel different). Those chips wont hash in my hands. I am not interested in investing another dime into getting this working. No one should. We paid for a WORKING 1.2Ths per miner period. That is what we should be getting. If AMT is facilitating that now somehow or are soliciting suggestions on how to get that, then I think that is a more than fair situation. But they need to tell us more about the situation before we honestly can sign off. They did solicit our opinions on it.

But getting chips might be good for you....you can blow the extra money on it. Not for me. I already spent more time and money on this than I wanted to. I think ALL of us feel the same way. We just want working hardware. I am willing to offer up solutions to AMT to make that happen (one of which is the S2 option) but its on them to do the proper execution on it.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 03:00:26 PM
\Well Frictionless coin, ask yourself what's in it for them if they give us back our cash? Nothing... If they use the cash to invest in a new board, they have a potential gain for themselves.

What's in it for them???   They avoid be indicted for 'wire fraud'.  They avoid having to be obligated to the MPP.  

What's in it for them to copy a board from an existing manufacturer?  Given that this kind of hardware depreciates by 30% every month?  Anyone with half a brain would call it quits and refund everyone.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 06, 2014, 02:54:26 PM
Hence my last post, getting two Antminer S2's at 2599 each would be 2Ths for us. And they pocket 500 bucks actually (I am correcting myself as its 5599). we paid alot of money for this hardware. They still have to deal with the logistics of getting the money back from the SMD house who fucked up their production. But that's not to put it coldly our problem. Ours is to get what we paid for. BUT if AMT wants to make this right with a minimal loss, going the S2 route for us would be the best. And I imagine buynig them in bulk results in some kind of discounts which mean they can pocket that discounted amount while still giving us the THs we paid for adn then some. We all win under this scenario. I presume 2199 based on the 4 dollar discounts they give for existing customers. Buying in bulk likely they would provide some discount there.

@AMT Hitting up bitmaintech for info might not be a bad idea to get this done. We all win here and you start to win credibility with delivery. You maintain yourself as a reseller. The rebuild of hardware might be more costly presuming not to mention time consuming. This would at least act as a stopgap until you can restructure or redevelop the hardware and come back stronger later on. But for now this might at least legally satisfy everyone here.

Buying Antminer rigs to compensate customers implies that they have the cash to buy them.

I don't think they have the cash,  all they have are a bunch of coincraft A1 chips and technobit boards.

I suggest you all take them up on the offer to get the coincraft A1 chips because it looks like they won't even have the money to assemble the technobit boards!

How do they not have cash? They collected over a million and a half dollars from customers.

Well I don't know where the cash went.

But they seem to have enough cash to commission a new Technobit board to be created.

Though they seem to have no cash to pay anyone to provide support.

I am making the assumption that the've already burned through 1/2 of the funds that were used to purchase the parts for the machines.  I could be wrong, after all, not everyone has yet to receive a machine (even if it was broken).  


Well Frictionless coin, ask yourself what's in it for them if they give us back our cash? Nothing... If they use the cash to invest in a new board, they have a potential gain for themselves.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 02:52:41 PM
Hence my last post, getting two Antminer S2's at 2599 each would be 2Ths for us. And they pocket 500 bucks actually (I am correcting myself as its 5599). we paid alot of money for this hardware. They still have to deal with the logistics of getting the money back from the SMD house who fucked up their production. But that's not to put it coldly our problem. Ours is to get what we paid for. BUT if AMT wants to make this right with a minimal loss, going the S2 route for us would be the best. And I imagine buynig them in bulk results in some kind of discounts which mean they can pocket that discounted amount while still giving us the THs we paid for adn then some. We all win under this scenario. I presume 2199 based on the 4 dollar discounts they give for existing customers. Buying in bulk likely they would provide some discount there.

@AMT Hitting up bitmaintech for info might not be a bad idea to get this done. We all win here and you start to win credibility with delivery. You maintain yourself as a reseller. The rebuild of hardware might be more costly presuming not to mention time consuming. This would at least act as a stopgap until you can restructure or redevelop the hardware and come back stronger later on. But for now this might at least legally satisfy everyone here.

Buying Antminer rigs to compensate customers implies that they have the cash to buy them.

I don't think they have the cash,  all they have are a bunch of coincraft A1 chips and technobit boards.

I suggest you all take them up on the offer to get the coincraft A1 chips because it looks like they won't even have the money to assemble the technobit boards!

How do they not have cash? They collected over a million and a half dollars from customers.

Well I don't know where the cash went.

But they seem to have enough cash to commission a new Technobit board to be created.

Though they seem to have no cash to pay anyone to provide support.

I am making the assumption that the've already burned through 1/2 of the funds that were used to purchase the parts for the machines.  I could be wrong, after all, not everyone has yet to receive a machine (even if it was broken).  

My reasoning why the may not have the cash.   They did not convert the BTC they received into cash!

So let's say they raised $1 million in BTC,  let's say they spent 1/4 of that on parts,  that means they have have 750K left.... now that gets halved because of how BTC is trading... that's down to $375K.   Now they got $1 million of orders left that need to fulfill,  but they can buy like 1THs at 1/2 the price.  So to do that, they'll need $500K... but they only have $375K. So they can't do it!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 06, 2014, 02:51:05 PM
I've got this 58 lb brick of government cheese in a box coming back to me from AMT. (actually at least you can eat Govt. cheese).  Please advise.

Brian, someone will get there and pick it up, just calm down. That's like the other side of philly, its pretty much an hour drive but we're gonna get it, its not going anywhere and we're gonna take care of it but you gotta calm down about this.

Josh lives on one side of Philly and AMT is on the other side. There's not too many sides left. Besides, isn't the FedEx facility that's trying to deliver mrpark's miner located in the vicinity of AMT's office, or is it more cost efficient for them to be an hour away, making several attempts to deliver to AMT and everybody else in the neighborhood.

"Honey, I'm going to be late again for dinner. I delivered all the packages on one side of town, but I have to go to Haverford to deliver, again, to AMT, about an hour away."

"Why didn't FedEx use their facility near Haverford to deliver AMT's package?"

"Honey, obviously you don't know how FedEx works."

The address actually would be near the assembly plant if I had to guess as that is where it left from. Least its my guess.

Riddle me this.  Why would he not have the returns shipped to the assembly plant? Why would he have returns shipped to the other side of town?

It's ironic they are only 15-20 minutes away from that FedEx, but remember they said I only live 30 minutes from the office when I really live 2 hours away! Why is their measurement of time so long for themselves, but when it comes to my route they shorten the time four times over?
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 02:47:31 PM
I've got this 58 lb brick of government cheese in a box coming back to me from AMT. (actually at least you can eat Govt. cheese).  Please advise.

Brian, someone will get there and pick it up, just calm down. That's like the other side of philly, its pretty much an hour drive but we're gonna get it, its not going anywhere and we're gonna take care of it but you gotta calm down about this.

Josh lives on one side of Philly and AMT is on the other side. There's not too many sides left. Besides, isn't the FedEx facility that's trying to deliver mrpark's miner located in the vicinity of AMT's office, or is it more cost efficient for them to be an hour away, making several attempts to deliver to AMT and everybody else in the neighborhood.

"Honey, I'm going to be late again for dinner. I delivered all the packages on one side of town, but I have to go to Haverford to deliver, again, to AMT, about an hour away."

"Why didn't FedEx use their facility near Haverford to deliver AMT's package?"

"Honey, obviously you don't know how FedEx works."

The address actually would be near the assembly plant if I had to guess as that is where it left from. Least its my guess.

Riddle me this.  Why would he not have the returns shipped to the assembly plant? Why would he have returns shipped to the other side of town?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 06, 2014, 02:46:25 PM
Hence my last post, getting two Antminer S2's at 2599 each would be 2Ths for us. And they pocket 500 bucks actually (I am correcting myself as its 5599). we paid alot of money for this hardware. They still have to deal with the logistics of getting the money back from the SMD house who fucked up their production. But that's not to put it coldly our problem. Ours is to get what we paid for. BUT if AMT wants to make this right with a minimal loss, going the S2 route for us would be the best. And I imagine buynig them in bulk results in some kind of discounts which mean they can pocket that discounted amount while still giving us the THs we paid for adn then some. We all win under this scenario. I presume 2199 based on the 4 dollar discounts they give for existing customers. Buying in bulk likely they would provide some discount there.

@AMT Hitting up bitmaintech for info might not be a bad idea to get this done. We all win here and you start to win credibility with delivery. You maintain yourself as a reseller. The rebuild of hardware might be more costly presuming not to mention time consuming. This would at least act as a stopgap until you can restructure or redevelop the hardware and come back stronger later on. But for now this might at least legally satisfy everyone here.

Buying Antminer rigs to compensate customers implies that they have the cash to buy them.

I don't think they have the cash,  all they have are a bunch of coincraft A1 chips and technobit boards.

I suggest you all take them up on the offer to get the coincraft A1 chips because it looks like they won't even have the money to assemble the technobit boards!

How do they not have cash? They collected over a million and a half dollars from customers.
legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 02:43:00 PM
I would be happy if AMT buys a 1.6 TH/s cointerra and ships it to us.

Right now a TerraMiner IV 1.6 TH/s Bitcoin Miner cost $3,499 and is IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE.

Yeah, it is like a $2,500 loss but its better than nothing!

Man,  even those KNC folks are screwed.  They paid $12,000 for a 3TH/s system.   Two Cointerra systems would cost only $7,000 and you'll have 3.2 TH/s of hashing!


You are a glutton for punishment man. cointerra is also having shipping problems and alot of the same as AMT. Maybe not as bad but also not reliable if you read the reviews of the hardware. Why would you want to deal with more of the same crap knowing what you know now?

The bitmain option would be better overall as its much cheaper and would net us the min required. Hell 2x S2s 2599x2=5198 We get 2 THs AMT pockets 1k per miner and we get more hashing power out of the deal. We get a complete hardware package out of it. IF they were going that route. But I doubt it. I think we just send back the boards they get torn apart and the chips get tested/reused on rebuilt hardware, tested and sent back out to us.

Man,  how are you comparing a company that has shipped 5,000 units to customers to a company that has shipped zero?  



I could make a webpage that says I shipped a million miners....doesn't make it true. AMT posted on their site and blog that they have shipped a bunch of hardware too. That said they are dealing with a shit ton of similar problems and gross underperformance on their hardware that they now have to compensate users (which is part of the lawsuit against them)....so yea the comparison is pretty easy. How its being handled on the other hand.....thats something else.

Again not sure why you would argue the obvious logic of ordering 2x S2s over cointerra boxes? The numbers don't lie. You getting 1.6Ths....where you could get 2Ths for close to what you paid for and take a much smaller loss and get a better product in the process. Seems to me like it just makes sense.

Dude,  you don't have a clue if you think Cointerra and AMT are in a similar situation.   I used to be a Cointerra customer,   when I asked for a refund, it took one week for them to send me back a check.     

legendary
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
May 06, 2014, 02:40:27 PM
Hence my last post, getting two Antminer S2's at 2599 each would be 2Ths for us. And they pocket 500 bucks actually (I am correcting myself as its 5599). we paid alot of money for this hardware. They still have to deal with the logistics of getting the money back from the SMD house who fucked up their production. But that's not to put it coldly our problem. Ours is to get what we paid for. BUT if AMT wants to make this right with a minimal loss, going the S2 route for us would be the best. And I imagine buynig them in bulk results in some kind of discounts which mean they can pocket that discounted amount while still giving us the THs we paid for adn then some. We all win under this scenario. I presume 2199 based on the 4 dollar discounts they give for existing customers. Buying in bulk likely they would provide some discount there.

@AMT Hitting up bitmaintech for info might not be a bad idea to get this done. We all win here and you start to win credibility with delivery. You maintain yourself as a reseller. The rebuild of hardware might be more costly presuming not to mention time consuming. This would at least act as a stopgap until you can restructure or redevelop the hardware and come back stronger later on. But for now this might at least legally satisfy everyone here.

Buying Antminer rigs to compensate customers implies that they have the cash to buy them.

I don't think they have the cash,  all they have are a bunch of coincraft A1 chips and technobit boards.

I suggest you all take them up on the offer to get the coincraft A1 chips because it looks like they won't even have the money to assemble the technobit boards!
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
May 06, 2014, 02:38:51 PM
I've got this 58 lb brick of government cheese in a box coming back to me from AMT. (actually at least you can eat Govt. cheese).  Please advise.

Brian, someone will get there and pick it up, just calm down. That's like the other side of philly, its pretty much an hour drive but we're gonna get it, its not going anywhere and we're gonna take care of it but you gotta calm down about this.

Josh lives on one side of Philly and AMT is on the other side. There's not too many sides left. Besides, isn't the FedEx facility that's trying to deliver mrpark's miner located in the vicinity of AMT's office, or is it more cost efficient for them to be an hour away, making several attempts to deliver to AMT and everybody else in the neighborhood.

"Honey, I'm going to be late again for dinner. I delivered all the packages on one side of town, but I have to go to Haverford to deliver, again, to AMT, about an hour away."

"Why didn't FedEx use their facility near Haverford to deliver AMT's package?"

"Honey, obviously you don't know how FedEx works."

The problem with driving an hour across Philly is that it is impossible unless you are going in circles. The city of Philadelphia is only 15 miles wide.  At 60 miles an hour, it should take you no more than 15 minutes to get from one side of Philly to the other.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
May 06, 2014, 02:38:25 PM
I would be happy if AMT buys a 1.6 TH/s cointerra and ships it to us.

Right now a TerraMiner IV 1.6 TH/s Bitcoin Miner cost $3,499 and is IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE.

Yeah, it is like a $2,500 loss but its better than nothing!

Man,  even those KNC folks are screwed.  They paid $12,000 for a 3TH/s system.   Two Cointerra systems would cost only $7,000 and you'll have 3.2 TH/s of hashing!


You are a glutton for punishment man. cointerra is also having shipping problems and alot of the same as AMT. Maybe not as bad but also not reliable if you read the reviews of the hardware. Why would you want to deal with more of the same crap knowing what you know now?

The bitmain option would be better overall as its much cheaper and would net us the min required. Hell 2x S2s 2599x2=5198 We get 2 THs AMT pockets 1k per miner and we get more hashing power out of the deal. We get a complete hardware package out of it. IF they were going that route. But I doubt it. I think we just send back the boards they get torn apart and the chips get tested/reused on rebuilt hardware, tested and sent back out to us.

Man,  how are you comparing a company that has shipped 5,000 units to customers to a company that has shipped zero?  



I could make a webpage that says I shipped a million miners....doesn't make it true. AMT posted on their site and blog that they have shipped a bunch of hardware too. That said they are dealing with a shit ton of similar problems and gross underperformance on their hardware that they now have to compensate users (which is part of the lawsuit against them)....so yea the comparison is pretty easy. How its being handled on the other hand.....thats something else.

Again not sure why you would argue the obvious logic of ordering 2x S2s over cointerra boxes? The numbers don't lie. You getting 1.6Ths....where you could get 2Ths for close to what you paid for and take a much smaller loss and get a better product in the process. Seems to me like it just makes sense.
Jump to: