What verifiable news? That a package was delivered? woohoo. Second or third try?
For all we know a homeless person in the alley signed for it.
Yes, that a package was indeed delivered to the address known to be used by AMT.
It was a point people were arguing. "They aren't even accepting packages." This was true of Mr. Parks miner prior to the "official" RMA process, though.
So yes verifiable news because people were debating the legitimacy of accepting a package. A behemoth like FedEx wouldn't make simple mistake like that was the argument and now it's a (tiny) mystery that's been laid to rest.
Second try actually,well I should say their second try they mistakenly sent it back to phoenix never actually to me, they captured the wayward package and rerouted it to where it needed to go. So really first time for me had fedex not make a series of increasing poor decisions, which was the case because I documented the process and called every time it looked like they did something wrong.
That is the process with some of the larger corps is that there is to much automation, and their employees can't think for the machines. While unlikely that it was a homeless person in an alley, this is on a route where the driver fails to deliver packages to the back of a building which has it's own address so I guess the driver could in fact be that stupid.