Nexus - Pure SHA3 + CPU/GPU + nPoS + 15 Active Innovations + More to Come - page 372.

SRBOOTH

sr. member

Activity: 309

Merit: 250

Quote from: KryptoKash on July 22, 2014, 09:19:19 AM

Quote from: armin22 on July 22, 2014, 08:58:55 AM

Quote from: tamdc on July 22, 2014, 08:51:33 AM

Can I mine this coin with GPU? If can, where can I find the miner?

If i read right, the miner will be released on the coins launch.

The GPU miner will be released as soon as it is done being coded. BitSlapper is currently coding it for the community. :-)

Can you tell us if there will be Nvidia support re: GPU miner?...thanks....this looks like good work, signed up/in follwing all the way!

KryptoKash

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 275

If you fail...just dont fail again

Quote from: armin22 on July 22, 2014, 08:58:55 AM

Quote from: tamdc on July 22, 2014, 08:51:33 AM

Can I mine this coin with GPU? If can, where can I find the miner?

If i read right, the miner will be released on the coins launch.

The GPU miner will be released as soon as it is done being coded. BitSlapper is currently coding it for the community. :-)

armin22

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: tamdc on July 22, 2014, 08:51:33 AM

Can I mine this coin with GPU? If can, where can I find the miner?

If i read right, the miner will be released on the coins launch.

tamdc

full member

Activity: 503

Merit: 100

Can I mine this coin with GPU? If can, where can I find the miner?

armin22

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: gjhiggins on July 22, 2014, 06:49:11 AM

Quote from: Videlicet on July 22, 2014, 01:45:12 AM

It was a shitcoin yes, because the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin, we have.

Why do you persist in embarrassing yourself? “the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin” - that's completely bogus. You have no means of demonstrating the accuracy of that conjecture, let alone its relevance. The choice of fabrication hints strongly at narrow-minded, thoughtless intolerance.

Great programming skills, dangerously weak elsewhere. You should start to challenge your prejudices before they start to challenge you.

Despondently,

Graham

Lol, someone is using big words to give an impression of intellect.

gjhiggins

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 1278

Quote from: Videlicet on July 22, 2014, 01:45:12 AM

It was a shitcoin yes, because the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin, we have.

Why do you persist in embarrassing yourself? “the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin” - that's completely bogus. You have no means of demonstrating the accuracy of that conjecture, let alone its relevance. The choice of fabrication hints strongly at narrow-minded, thoughtless intolerance.

Great programming skills, dangerously weak elsewhere. You should start to challenge your prejudices before they start to challenge you.

Despondently,

Graham

phzi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Videlicet on July 22, 2014, 01:45:12 AM

Quote from: balu2 on July 22, 2014, 01:09:43 AM

so this is basically deletecoin with a different ann, right?
Deletecoin ended up being a fail and a shitcoin itself. I can't see why this should play out any different than deletecoin.
This coin has only advantage over deletecoin of no premine. Correct me if i am wrong.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anndeletecoin-get-in-while-you-still-can-511880

Deletecoin burned shitcoins, this adds to their value [we will be dumping]. It was a shitcoin yes, because the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin, we have.

~Viz

edit: it seems though, that their new deletecoin 2.0 took the idea from Coinshield with the dumping... curious

I think balu2 ignored (or didn't bother to read about) the huge and unique innovations that CoinShield is going to offer...

The anti-timewarp mechanism alone is revolutionary, I would argue.

Videlicet

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1058

Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io

Quote from: balu2 on July 22, 2014, 01:09:43 AM

so this is basically deletecoin with a different ann, right?
Deletecoin ended up being a fail and a shitcoin itself. I can't see why this should play out any different than deletecoin.
This coin has only advantage over deletecoin of no premine. Correct me if i am wrong.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anndeletecoin-get-in-while-you-still-can-511880

Deletecoin burned shitcoins, this adds to their value [we will be dumping]. It was a shitcoin yes, because the developer didn't expend the effort required to make a worthwhile coin, we have.

~Viz

edit: it seems though, that their new deletecoin 2.0 took the idea from Coinshield with the dumping... curious

balu2

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

so this is basically deletecoin with a different ann, right?
Deletecoin ended up being a fail and a shitcoin itself. I can't see why this should play out any different than deletecoin.
This coin has only advantage over deletecoin of no premine. Correct me if i am wrong.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/anndeletecoin-get-in-while-you-still-can-511880

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

need a coinshield store - purchase products with any coin instead of just paying in Coinshield coins. Would have basically same function but would allow for profit to continually grow the product.

"I bought lousy shit/scam coins and all I got was this stupid Tshirt"

just an idea. I like the idea of the project though.

KryptoKash

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 275

If you fail...just dont fail again

Quote from: gjhiggins on July 20, 2014, 03:52:17 PM

Quote from: KryptoKash on July 20, 2014, 03:22:27 PM

Reserve your username, Sign up now prelaunch: http://coinshieldtalk.org

http://coinshieldtalk.org/forum/coin-shield-talk/shitcoin-petitions/105-digitalcommerce

That's a brilliant start; cogent, articulate, with a wealth of supporting proof. It's exactly the kind of the persuasive and constructive discussion that you were so confidently expecting.

And the reality is exactly what I was expecting.

Sadly,

Graham

I don't expect petitions like those to gain any momentum. After a few petitions are approved there will be examples/templates for users to follow.

gjhiggins

legendary

Activity: 2254

Merit: 1278

Quote from: KryptoKash on July 20, 2014, 03:22:27 PM

Reserve your username, Sign up now prelaunch: http://coinshieldtalk.org

http://coinshieldtalk.org/forum/coin-shield-talk/shitcoin-petitions/105-digitalcommerce

That's a brilliant start; cogent, articulate, with a wealth of supporting proof. It's exactly the kind of the persuasive and constructive discussion that you were so confidently expecting.

And the reality is exactly what I was expecting.

Sadly,

Graham

KryptoKash

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 275

If you fail...just dont fail again

Reserve your username, Sign up now prelaunch: http://coinshieldtalk.org

phzi

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: iwzsce on July 20, 2014, 05:32:32 AM

ASIC resistant? lower power? Can anyone tell me?

There won't be ASICs available promptly, so I would call that ASIC resistant, sure.

Lower power is essentially a myth - only under-optimized GPU mining software uses less power (at least, to any noticeable margin).

iwzsce

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

ASIC resistant? lower power? Can anyone tell me?

Videlicet

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1058

Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io

Started Round 2 of Private Testing...

Changes in Round 2 [DONE]:
+GPU/CPU miners fixed after conflict with POS blocks
+Updated Fractional Excess System to improve margin of error [was lingering around 10%]
+Updated Difficulty to reduce the Maximum % increase. This should help keep block times more consistent
+Updated Protocol Version, will reject Round 1 Test binaries.
+Added transaction emulator.exe in package to test a large transaction load on the network.

Changes in Qt [TODO LIST]:
+Noticed Qt doesn't react very well to high transaction load [it becomes very choppy]. Need to improve the multithreading capabilities, having GUI refreshed on its own thread.
+Transactions take a long time to send if there are many inputs [from a lot of fractional rewards], this needs to be optimized further to prevent GUI threadlock.

Currently Coin Supply is at 99.948199% [~0.051801 % margin of error]. This is a great improvement from testing Round 1.

edit: Here is some data from my supply utility for anyone interested
target supply after 182 minutes = 11470.817850
actual supply after 182 minutes = 11441
supply percentage 99.740055 %

target supply after 200 minutes = 12605.184394
actual supply after 200 minutes = 12566
supply percentage 99.689141 %

target supply after 213 minutes = 13424.436812
actual supply after 213 minutes = 13480
supply percentage 100.413896 %

target supply after 218 minutes = 13739.531148
actual supply after 218 minutes = 13784
supply percentage 100.323656 %

target supply after 246 minutes = 15504.031210
actual supply after 246 minutes = 15496
supply percentage 99.948199 %

target supply after 267 minutes = 16827.374834
actual supply after 267 minutes = 16764
supply percentage 99.623383 %

target supply after 270 minutes = 17016.421725
actual supply after 270 minutes = 17004
supply percentage 99.927002 %

target supply after 319 minutes = 20104.109798
actual supply after 319 minutes = 19980
supply percentage 99.382665 %

target supply after 332 minutes = 20923.267737
actual supply after 332 minutes = 20747
supply percentage 99.157552 %

target supply after 334 minutes = 21049.291119
actual supply after 334 minutes = 20910
supply percentage 99.338262 %

~Viz

Videlicet

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1058

Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io

edit: private testing is going well, proof of stake just kicked in, and everything is running smoothly. I am noticing the Coin Supply is deflated about 92% of target, this will be something I tend to on the next round of tests. [we want about 99.5% - 100.5 % ideally]. Current transaction confirmation time is ~ 3 minutes at a constant rate of 1 tx per second.

The prime number channel should be "very" difficult to port to a GPU currently [it is totally different than primecoin], but of course it can have the possibility of getting mined by GPU's. If this happens, there can always be modifications to the algorithms to continue to prevent such things. The same goes for SK-1024 and ASICS, the best defense against "hardware wars" is to change your software slightly every X period of time, and this will make any sort of specialized hardware useless.

Remember, there is always a crack, that's how the light gets in. Sometimes all we can do is make a crack very expensive.
~Videlicet

SRBOOTH

sr. member

Activity: 309

Merit: 250

I am interested in testing..........please pm or post.........thank you

cwrmyy888

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

My friend ！I want to test Grin

，how ?

Sinohe88

member

Activity: 102

Merit: 10

Quote from: merc84 on July 18, 2014, 06:02:01 AM

Quote from: Sinohe88 on July 18, 2014, 05:28:59 AM

Quote from: merc84 on July 18, 2014, 05:06:09 AM

Sadly new algo usually mean poor stock miner for public and highly optimized private miners for dev's and anyone with deep enough pockets to buy optimized miners, which does not help distribution of coins at all. I'd like to be proved wrong...

as far as i know there is no gpu miner yet and they are working to make one
it's about the trust, you can trust the dev team and accept what they are telling/offering you or not
nobody can prove that you are wrong or right
it's your choice to make, do trust or don't

I should clarify by dev i do not implicitly mean coin dev, there are a number of devs who could easily optimize the public code upon release.

yes, agree, but it's for existing algorithm like scrypt, X11 ... etc, not this one

Topic: Nexus - Pure SHA3 + CPU/GPU + nPoS + 15 Active Innovations + More to Come - page 372. (Read 785514 times)