Pages:
Author

Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 7. (Read 1706 times)

full member
Activity: 431
Merit: 100
i think for now if we comparing ICO and IEO is not fair mate
anyway if we look back, a lot of big project born from ICO,, and tradeable on top exchange too
i hope someday the glory of ICO will coming back in crypto space Wink
time has passed. each system has its period. ICO with their glory and IEO also with their current glory. we will not compare it all because after all ICO gave birth to many big projects as well.
member
Activity: 579
Merit: 13
Are you kind to your neighbor? Think it through
One prominent issue with some project team is that they see a top exchange platform as the pinnacle of suceess for their crypto currency projects.

A good exchange platform for a nee project should be an icing on a cake which the project will thrive upon, it should not be otherwise.
listing onntop exchange does not equal good price which is why work should be done on the project product to experience good returns
sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 292
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
I believe all the new projects that I want are listed in the top exchanges in this market, but to be listed there is very difficult. They need to spend a lot of money on listing fees, and their project must be really good and have a large community of support. It is really too difficult for new projects
sr. member
Activity: 1039
Merit: 250
BabelFish - FISH Token Sale at Sovryn
It is true that IEO projects are far better compared to ICO projects, but the success of IEO projects depends on exchanges.
If it is not listed on the top exchanges, it is indeed quite difficult to attract investors and also the reality is not all IEO projects
can afford top exchanges. That becomes a serious problem to raise funds, no need to worry that every problem there is a way out.
Actually there are several ways to raise funds, one of them by creating a bounty campaign. In my opinion quite effective promotion
with bounty campaign to raise funds.

i think for now if we comparing ICO and IEO is not fair mate
anyway if we look back, a lot of big project born from ICO,, and tradeable on top exchange too
i hope someday the glory of ICO will coming back in crypto space Wink
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 12
There are consequences for every action
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

This is a true perspective when we consider new projects, but if all new projects cannot afford top exchanges, then they should avoid mediocre exchange platforms because it totally ruins the project without a hope of resurrecting.

To solve this, projects need to be patient before delving into crowdfunding situations, get into the best exchange for their ieo and that lays a good foundation for success
full member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 104
GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

That is true and no one expects them or makes it mandatory for them to list on top exchanges as a start but if they have the funds and still wishes to then it's a welcome idea. In my own opinion, the first thing that matters is what the project is bringing, once it is a good one and the team have shown their eagerness to keep working then going for medium exchanges will also help to give them a good result because every exchange appreciates good projects. So in essence, if a project don't have the neccessary funds for top exchanges they should list out other medium exchanges that falls within their expectations, then narrow it down by comparing the success rate of IEO on those exchanges, this I think will help them make the right choice.
full member
Activity: 2408
Merit: 202
I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.
indeed, only the place of exchange that has a good reputation will still be used to do IEO because they are risking the good name of the place of exchange to provide information about coin offers through the IEO method, so when they want to give IEO, the place of exchange must be truly selective.

That's how investors see opportunities, once IEO being offered to a good exchange many will participates and take
part, while if the project being held to unknown exchange
Only small support or most of the time it won't be supported, it's a mentality that circulating around this industry
good exchange gives reputations to introductory project.
Nowadays, if the team don't have enough funds to compete placing their project to a well known exchange the chance
of surviving is really small, they needed to plan very well
before taking part to this business.
hero member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 953
Temporary forum vacation
Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't
Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.

Look it up,,, they have talked about it but their claim is that they never charge any listing fees at all, they instead call it management fees to charge for the work and due diligence.

Bullshit mainly as I myself have seen replies from exchanges including Binance in the past. Maybe now they are not so blatant about it!
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 502
I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.
indeed, only the place of exchange that has a good reputation will still be used to do IEO because they are risking the good name of the place of exchange to provide information about coin offers through the IEO method, so when they want to give IEO, the place of exchange must be truly selective.
copper member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 103
Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't
Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.
sr. member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 251
KUWA.ai
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.
the top exchange is the best decision for a new project to strengthen its market from the start. but when listed on a cheaper exchange it will make their market very easy to collapse. the considerations depend on how they make their markets grow and not fall. because for new projects that experience bad market conditions it will be very difficult to control their markets.
It's the best choice but it needs a lot of money. Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't
member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 11
I always believe that the quality of project determines its future, these days crypto community is smart enough they don't want to be involve in a pump and dump project anymore unfortunately some big exchanges are doing this just for making money and their popularity attracts people to get involve in their provided ieo I have seen many quality projects ieo on some small exchanges which was unsuccessful because people are addicted to trust on the ieo of big exchanges and I don't think it will change.
full member
Activity: 778
Merit: 100
SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.
the top exchange is the best decision for a new project to strengthen its market from the start. but when listed on a cheaper exchange it will make their market very easy to collapse. the considerations depend on how they make their markets grow and not fall. because for new projects that experience bad market conditions it will be very difficult to control their markets.
full member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 116
It is true that IEO projects are far better compared to ICO projects, but the success of IEO projects depends on exchanges.
If it is not listed on the top exchanges, it is indeed quite difficult to attract investors and also the reality is not all IEO projects
can afford top exchanges. That becomes a serious problem to raise funds, no need to worry that every problem there is a way out.
Actually there are several ways to raise funds, one of them by creating a bounty campaign. In my opinion quite effective promotion
with bounty campaign to raise funds.
hero member
Activity: 2492
Merit: 542
Recently I saw some new DeFi startups with no ico/ieo but has a really good price and volume on dex exchange, what a new project really need is supporters and proper marketing strategies to boost your project some others use crypto vloggers to share those projects and I think its more effective to encourage large investors to join and invest, new projects dont need top exchanges to provide more liquidity you can also use the power of dex like uniswap look at this one for example 4 days after launch on dex and has $600k yesterday https://uniswap.info/pair/0x966053ca4fca049173eb1f27e4cb168ccb794534   
sr. member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 258
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

I still go for the project's potential and what it can bring to the market, going to the top exchange is a good option for a new project but if it has a hard time with the listing fee and the cost, he can opt for a much cheaper exchange while building his reputation and developing the project.
sr. member
Activity: 1162
Merit: 260
It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly

1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb

These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO with low projects but they look for quality even Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO except probit and other low exchanges. Every new project they always accommodate, even though many failures occur.
Upbit conducts a price survey, their exchange is different to raise funds, and I think that is a good innovation after IEO and good for the future
Upbit has very difficult requirements compared with other exchange sites. I think bithumb is much more friendly compared with upbit. I think a small project will be so difficult to list its token in one of these exchange sites.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 521
No more Rekt and Bust
l think it is really more nice chance for new projects to afford top exchanges. That is why new projects which are in the top exchanges are more trusted by investors than others in small exchanges. It can help you to make something better like more investors who are interested in investing in the project. No doubt most people were damaged by ICO scam projects, but to be on the top exchanges can help you to be trusted by investors.
full member
Activity: 573
Merit: 102
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

The fee friendly exchanges out there that will charge little fee for listing IEO's are literally having small volumes and investors and this is the reason why most low capital project do raise a little amount and perform wholefully again listing on exchanges. I believe people just have to do more research about any project There're  interested in because only start-ups that with good and strong backing s survives now
sr. member
Activity: 573
Merit: 250
The difference between ICO and IEO is that scams have reduce significantly because during ICO there were many scam projects floating around and also now you need to have a sound idea, not just that you will go and copy another project idea and copy paste their whitepaper. I believe if your idea is sound and the project has good developers behind it, it would definitely be listed on big exchange
Deserve top any exchange big ideas of any projects. If IEO reduces significant scam projects than what was the last project, which was successful by only ICO. Now low volume exchanges are helping scam people to raise funds. If slowly most coins die, then most of these low volume exchange IEO coins could die
Pages:
Jump to: