Probit is easy, good choice for new projects but honestly better exchanges will bring better results, my advice is not to launch any project if you don't have money for better exchanges
Projects these days apply for grants. If you have a good project which contributes so well towards the adoption of blockchain technology, to get a grant can be very easy to get. Manwhile such grant can be used to get a place on a good exchange. although, to get such a aid, the project must have good comunity support. 
Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 8. (Read 1706 times)
Fact is many scam developers have no money to run their scam projects and they usually end on small exchanges like p2pb2b, some projects are so bad that they will never work out unless you don't do your research on them, I've seen many projects failed since 2018 because the team have no good plan for the project, going small exchange is bad honestly
There are different reasons why its good to go for top exchanges
1. Projects that go on top exchanges are easily trust by investors
2. There are more investors on top exchanges that will surely invest in your project
3. You will easily raise your hard cap target
4. Top exchanges provide all the needy, e.g volumes and enough liquidity
1. Projects that go on top exchanges are easily trust by investors
2. There are more investors on top exchanges that will surely invest in your project
3. You will easily raise your hard cap target
4. Top exchanges provide all the needy, e.g volumes and enough liquidity
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...
What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
Dont mind the fee first but actually you should put up attention into these factors before What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
doing such step.
A realistic business model
Cutting-edge technologies
A minimal viable product (MVP)
A Token
A strong team backing the project
A reasonable hard cap
Initial investors’ buzz
A project website for marketing purpose (optional but recommended)
source: https://blog.sagipl.com/how-to-launch-a-successful-ieo/
Getting approved into your application do matter most but it do really need up into these qualities.
The difference between ICO and IEO is that scams have reduce significantly because during ICO there were many scam projects floating around and also now you need to have a sound idea, not just that you will go and copy another project idea and copy paste their whitepaper. I believe if your idea is sound and the project has good developers behind it, it would definitely be listed on big exchange
If a particular project is a good one, then the investors as well as the bounty hunters will be looking to hold the tokens for the long term. Also, the exchanges won't be having any issues in listing the tokens in their platform. But in case of 99% of the projects, exchange listing is considered very important. And the reason is very obvious. Investors have very little faith in them.
New cryptocurrency projects think that they can get a huge amount of money by conducting IEO on such scam exchanges like p2pb2b, vindax, exmarkets and so on and so forth, but when the IEO of these projects comes to an end, these cryptocurrency companies are left with nothing because on such scam cryptocurrency exchanges it is impossible to achieve a good result, therefore, each company needs to somehow find money from the very beginning to conduct IEO at least on a on mid-level exchanges in order to collect at least softcap.
The best advice I can give new developers is to hunt for top exchanges, the chance of raising hard cap is high when using top exchanges to raise funds, if team or devs can't afford big exchanges they are better off not releasing the project at all
It would have been a different story if we have less scam projects in crypto space, maybe binance and other top exchanges will give new projects the opportunity but getting listed on binance is more strict, CZ makes certain research on his own before allowing or approving new projects
I like the fact that not all new projects can get listed on binance or okex, it means less scam projects will have the opportunity to scam investors on these top exchanges
So, on the one hand, it is kind of bad for the leigt hard-working projects that the fees for a listing a binance are quite high, but on the other hand it prevents most of the scam projects to get listed at a big exchange.
It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly
1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb
These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects
Bithumb is the leading exchange in Korea, so I think it will be very difficult for new projects if they want to be IEO at this exchange. Probit will probably be a more suitable option because I find their process a lot easier 1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb
These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects
There are other ease exchanges that new projects can get listed on, they have no fake volumes and their customer services are good enough, team just need to do their own research
Probit, bithumb, bigONE , upbit, etc
Probit, bithumb, bigONE , upbit, etc
Sometimes is gradual process, new projects lists on small exchanges but as time goes by they list of better exchanges, all this doesn't even matter much to me, I'm much interested in very good projects with good use case, the usability is what will attract investors
A good usability of the project can make the exchange sites interested to listed it for free. We have seen some new projects that being listed on several exchange site without even tried to apply to be listed on these exchange sites. Good usability will attract the demand and this will build a good community
Sometimes is gradual process, new projects lists on small exchanges but as time goes by they list of better exchanges, all this doesn't even matter much to me, I'm much interested in very good projects with good use case, the usability is what will attract investors
Listing can be free if the project is really good, it's real.
Haven't you ever seen a big exchange do it ?
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360038151092
Now it was only the turn of the developers to compete to make the project interesting and to be looked at by large exchanges.
Actually, this is very strange information about a free listing of a project on a banner. I am sure that binance made sure the prospects of the OGN coin before starting to work with this project and in my opinion this is an exclusive solution to Binance. any free listing is fraught with bad consequences, As an example, EtherDelta or ForkDelta, where free listing leads to clogging of the entire exchange with all kinds of tokens that have no value at all. There is a lot of information on the Internet that listing on exchanges costs from $ 50,000 to a million dollars, depending on the prospects of the project itself and on the rating of the cryptocurrency exchange. Haven't you ever seen a big exchange do it ?
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360038151092
Now it was only the turn of the developers to compete to make the project interesting and to be looked at by large exchanges.
But nevertheless, if projects have good chances in the future, then there are two options for the development of events, When developers will plan listing not on the most rated exchanges, but on less significant ones, in order to gain popularity among cryptocurrency users, and only then Plan listing on the most famous exchanges. Or, initially, raise money to pay for listing on the most rated exchanges, because Business is a business and the same rules apply everywhere.
Probit is easy, good choice for new projects but honestly better exchanges will bring better results, my advice is not to launch any project if you don't have money for better exchanges
I'm not sure if it's done by a big exchange. except for large projects or have been registered in several large markets first. they take into account the costs of being able to register and do an IEO on their exchange. nothing is for free. but if you can mention there is an exchange like that you can share it with others.
lol yeah , i paused a bit when i read he said free . how come is that possible ? if listing on exchange is free then anyone can be listed on it and exchange will be bloated that much . good or bad projects both have no exception but they still must pay because creating and growing an exchange isnt also easy and cheap plus exchange reputation is also at stake here . not all can afford listing on top exchange so its up to them if they need to collect more money and try again or choose lower quality exchange that have a cheap listing fee .
Haven't you ever seen a big exchange do it ?
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360038151092
Now it was only the turn of the developers to compete to make the project interesting and to be looked at by large exchanges.
I'm not sure if it's done by a big exchange. except for large projects or have been registered in several large markets first. they take into account the costs of being able to register and do an IEO on their exchange. nothing is for free. but if you can mention there is an exchange like that you can share it with others.
lol yeah , i paused a bit when i read he said free . how come is that possible ? if listing on exchange is free then anyone can be listed on it and exchange will be bloated that much . good or bad projects both have no exception but they still must pay because creating and growing an exchange isnt also easy and cheap plus exchange reputation is also at stake here . not all can afford listing on top exchange so its up to them if they need to collect more money and try again or choose lower quality exchange that have a cheap listing fee .
Haven't you ever seen a big exchange do it ?
https://www.binance.com/en/support/articles/360038151092
Now it was only the turn of the developers to compete to make the project interesting and to be looked at by large exchanges.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
raising new funds will only make investors think that the team of the project is not professional. however, it is only a matter of readiness. preparation before doing IEO, consideration of list costs at the top exchange, and others are strategies that need to be developed before doing IEO Well, many IEO fail because they only sell on one exchange, and the exchange is not popular.
Jump to: