Pages:
Author

Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 3. (Read 1719 times)

legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

IEO is probably the easiest way to generate fund, everything the developers are looking for is all there, Trust Hype and exchange support and this is what makes the project looks great when it comes to crowdfunding Trust is very important.
Unless there is new crowdfunding that can generate trust among investors I don't see other crowdfunding can equal IEO mechanism projects should raise initial funds so they can do IEO in the most trusted exchange that they can get into.
full member
Activity: 954
Merit: 104
ludenaprotocol.io
I do not understand why top exchanges didn´t adjust the listing fees for the new IEO projects. They still collecting same amount of money like in 2017, but the difference is that investors do not invest even one-tenth of what they invested in 2017.  Roll Eyes
jr. member
Activity: 180
Merit: 5
It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly
1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb
These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects
Its now has been 4 years since I am a crypto user and I can claim that I did not use any of them except Probit. I've heard about Bithumb after their big loss caused by hack, but thats it.
For a fresh new project that could mean - get ready to face very little demand and most of the times it has nothing to do with actual usability of the product
full member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 103
true, not all projects are capable of listing coins on a  exchange or large exchange the opposite happened Most projects afford listing a small market because funds that can be when IEO is minimal, better to choose IEO with a large partner and have personal capital
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 794
I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!
One mistake projects of today do is that they focus too much on how much their token would worth; instead of focusing on how much value their product would bring.

If you have a good working product ;top exchange platforms would offer you a chance to list without stress and that aside, anywhere your project lists, it demands great volume.

Agreed, they have it backwards, but this because they know very well they are not capable to create a valuable product, they know they will create a coin that is just like the other thousands of coins that we have in the market and as such the only chance they have to make money for themselves is that their coin shows positive growth at least for some time so they can attract some investors to their coin, but as we know this very difficult to achieve unless they get access to the top exchanges which is why they are always trying to figure out for a way to get in those exchanges without having to pay the necessary fee for it.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1029
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
There are still exchanges out there that has good reputation and most IEOs out there can be listed. It's like a kick starter to get you going on the market. When when the token's price pumps, then you can list it to another exchange. Being flexible on the market is key for success.
As long as the IEOs are not launched on the low tier or even scam tier exchange site like p2p, latoken, coinsbit, chainx, vindax and that will have a good future.
A new listing can't be done instantly and that needs a lot of consideration from the new exchange site.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 696
[Nope]No hype delivers more than hope
The exchange shows a picture of how the project's seriousness in achieving its objectives and top exchange as a support for its success. All projects want the top exchange by displaying it on their site that the application is in progress. Unfortunately, the top exchange has its own eligibility criteria that a crypto will be approved is on the list.

Achievement of fundraising targets cannot be forced if the project does not have attractive objectives even if it ultimately extends the sales schedule. As a result, new projects are only able to be listed in small exchanges and listing applications on the top exchanges will remain forever in the progress  until the project stops operating. The only way to get funds easily is that their goals must be really interesting, their ideas must be completely new. We are only limited to supporting them in terms of promotion, nothing more. For results, their own ideas are decisive.
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 721
Top Crypto Casino
I think if they don't have enough fund, then they shoundt launch any project. Cause we can see, many projects launched their IEOs on low quality exchanges, Afterward they get scam. That's make no sense. So never invest any IEOs without top exchange

Not just lack of funds. There are bigger reasons behind this. The big exchanges check a lot before listing an IEO, so there is nothing to hide from the project and can not think of scam. So they don't list ieo in big exchanges but list their ieo on small exchanges in order to make people fool.
full member
Activity: 799
Merit: 100
I think if they don't have enough fund, then they shoundt launch any project. Cause we can see, many projects launched their IEOs on low quality exchanges, Afterward they get scam. That's make no sense. So never invest any IEOs without top exchange
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 101
It is hard to imagine how some top exchanges ask for ridiculously high listing fees for projects to list their coin in the exchange. Listing fees of top exchanges that reach up to a million-dollar is just big that could be used by project in other ways. These high listing fees do not help small projects in any way.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 101
There are still exchanges out there that has good reputation and most IEOs out there can be listed. It's like a kick starter to get you going on the market. When when the token's price pumps, then you can list it to another exchange. Being flexible on the market is key for success.
full member
Activity: 944
Merit: 101
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
Exciting, but can you please share more details on the solution, please?

Of course, yes. Centric is the world's first dual-cryptocurrency payment network. Its innovative and unique concept is engineered to achieve breakthrough as a reliable form of payment. But better Google them to have a closer look
Looks like this guy is using 2 accounts and is talking to each other. And the conversation of these two accounts has nothing to do with this topic, hoping someone can handle him because he is trying to spam in this forum.
copper member
Activity: 798
Merit: 3
The new projects to be exist in the market is not mandatory to go for a top exchange rather they need to work on the project itself which do better in long term and must have to provide a unique service to the user. Then only the demand of the project growing hence the token also backed by this. So, the team member first of all should work on the project the decide to top exchanges gradually.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1492
Each project can try their luck in Binance listing vote contest. At least a try does not cost anything. Kucoin and crex24 have loyal prices for listing. And of course you can always try crappy p2pb2b or similar, where listing doesnt cost a penny. Last but not least - forkdelta always have open doors for newcomers Smiley
copper member
Activity: 966
Merit: 14
Issues about exchanges needs to be done right if not it will likely affect the project, hence the reason for good team. Of course not all new projects can afford starting their project on top exchanges, yet there are those who started on a smaller but good exchange before going higher. Also, I see it that projects with good ideas hardly bothers about exchanges reason is that, they always start by seeking for funds via private sale, thus having a palatable ground to seek for the exchange which will help them achieve a good IEO and in most cases their first choice isn't always top exchanges. So in other words, if the project is good, let the team start with private sale before IEO.
member
Activity: 742
Merit: 10
this is true,.. even the project was successful they cannot afford as well to list on top exchanges due to exchange payment that is very high.. but i think even the exchange fee is high as long as the project is good its worth it
member
Activity: 633
Merit: 10
If you have a good working product ;top exchange platforms would offer you a chance to list without stress and that aside, anywhere your project lists, it demands great volume.

working product will be main factor that be recognation from exchange to take decision is it appropriate or not list to them. reputable exchanges now not based on how much fee they will list. for example binance  , they already make statement that will not list project if have no quality although he courage to high fee.
member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 68
One mistake projects of today do is that they focus too much on how much their token would worth; instead of focusing on how much value their product would bring.

If you have a good working product ;top exchange platforms would offer you a chance to list without stress and that aside, anywhere your project lists, it demands great volume.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Exciting, but can you please share more details on the solution, please?

Of course, yes. Centric is the world's first dual-cryptocurrency payment network. Its innovative and unique concept is engineered to achieve breakthrough as a reliable form of payment. But better Google them to have a closer look
newbie
Activity: 112
Merit: 0
Well, the one I can definitely recommend you to have a look at is Centric token. This is entirely new standards on the field with really saturated roadmap

Exciting, but can you please share more details on the solution, please?
Pages:
Jump to: