Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 6. (Read 1719 times)
Cryptocurrency exchanges derive revenue: Commissions: Exchange charges a fee per trade, accumulating revenue as more users trade more money. Which Cryptocurrency Exchange has the Lowest Fees among pure crypto exchanges, Binance has the lowest fees.
Top exchange ensures liquidity and big investors. It's true that many projects can not afford top exchange but you also have to understand that those exchange can not list and shit project in their exchange because that will ruin their reputation. I think nowadays probit, Latoken this type of exchange became very popular among new crypto projects and I think there is nothing bad in that.
can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.
IEO is only good when it is held by the leading exchanges in this market. If you participate in IEO of small exchanges in this market such as Probit, Hotbit, chainx ... Then I believe it will be like ICOs, the price will fall hundreds of times and make you lose.Investors are actually going to be investing if they see the project worth investing in. A week ago many investors are grabbing Oikos token in hoo.com exchange as they did an IEO there. Although the price of BTC isn't going up, traders are up to invest a lot of projects in crypto. The Chinese are more aggressive in investing in their exchanges and this is why more Chinese exchanges are suddenly coming out from the shadows.
can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.
IEO is only good when it is held by the leading exchanges in this market. If you participate in IEO of small exchanges in this market such as Probit, Hotbit, chainx ... Then I believe it will be like ICOs, the price will fall hundreds of times and make you lose.I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...
What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
I think good exchaanger may be one fact here but their maybe another fault from team. Their roadmap, their subjects of project, token value and finally arrangement. But yes if any team wailing to make success an IEO they must come with big investment and if they have scamming mentality they should not.
thanks.
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...
What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
So true, there are many exchanges available, it's left for new project team to make their choices but the truth will remain the same, if you want success so badly for your project you should be wise enough to go top exchanges or good exchange What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
Why small exchanges? It's better not to release your project at all, small exchanges will bring nothing but bad influence, I wish every new developers can go through screening or something, we will see that not all developers know what they are doing, they are here for money
Exactly, small exchanges and no volumes will kill new projects. I saw a lot of projects like that, they tried to list them at small exchanges but in the end the price collapsed many times and no one invested in it, gradually dev team also abandoned the project and create other projects.Why small exchanges? It's better not to release your project at all, small exchanges will bring nothing but bad influence, I wish every new developers can go through screening or something, we will see that not all developers know what they are doing, they are here for money
Exactly, small exchanges and no volumes will kill new projects. I saw a lot of projects like that, they tried to list them at small exchanges but in the end the price collapsed many times and no one invested in it, gradually dev team also abandoned the project and create other projects.
Why small exchanges? It's better not to release your project at all, small exchanges will bring nothing but bad influence, I wish every new developers can go through screening or something, we will see that not all developers know what they are doing, they are here for money
can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.
IEO is only good when it is held by the leading exchanges in this market. If you participate in IEO of small exchanges in this market such as Probit, Hotbit, chainx ... Then I believe it will be like ICOs, the price will fall hundreds of times and make you lose.
can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.
IEO is only good when it is held by the leading exchanges in this market. If you participate in IEO of small exchanges in this market such as Probit, Hotbit, chainx ... Then I believe it will be like ICOs, the price will fall hundreds of times and make you lose. I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...
What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
There is something about business, presentation matters a lot. And that's what we are talking about here, the way you present your business in this cryptocurrency market matters a lot, same as the way you present it in real life. In real life if your shop is not kept clean, people won't like to buy from you and when it comes to cryptocurrency, if you're making use of an exchange that doesn't look so good, people still won't be interested.What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?
My advice to those that are running these projects would be that they shouldn't go for it until they have been able to raise enough funds that will be enough to start their business. It doesn't make sense that you start and end up on a useless exchange and expect your investors to start making use of that exchange just because your project is there, no it sounds stupid.
If new projects can't afford listing money for top exchanges they should find less costly exchanges, this doesn't mean the project will end up badly, the success of a project depends on the team professionalism
it can be step by step but it will give a very good impression for the project that can afford to be listed on good exchange sites. We know that investors were putting exchange sites above the development progress and this is the realityIf the project's team is sincere with their goals, they can always start in a small decent exchange.
The fee that they will allot to top exchanges can be dedicated to their developments instead.
Without good progress on their platform, they can't pull it off in exchanges.
I prefer to have working platform with active users rather than go for top exchanges and fail to maintain their market because they have no strong use case.
So the project should not worry about getting listed in those top exchanges but worry about their actual developments.
If new projects can't afford listing money for top exchanges they should find less costly exchanges, this doesn't mean the project will end up badly, the success of a project depends on the team professionalism
it can be step by step but it will give a very good impression for the project that can afford to be listed on good exchange sites. We know that investors were putting exchange sites above the development progress and this is the reality 
can be said that the reputation of the ICO has been bad, most investors are currently reluctant to invest in ICO again for several reasons including the risk of losing money in the ICO. but I think the presence of IEO slightly reduces the risk of fraud and is good for IEO who can do funding at the top exchanges like Binance or Okex.
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
As far as I know it is difficult to be listed at Binance, they have a strict process for selecting new projects. In addition to the fees listed there are very expensive, I heard some people say they need to pay $ 2 million to be listed if the project meets their requirements.
If new projects can't afford listing money for top exchanges they should find less costly exchanges, this doesn't mean the project will end up badly, the success of a project depends on the team professionalism
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
As far as I know it is difficult to be listed at Binance, they have a strict process for selecting new projects. In addition to the fees listed there are very expensive, I heard some people say they need to pay $ 2 million to be listed if the project meets their requirements. 
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
that's true but that needs a lot of qualifications especially from the product must be audited but the agreement between the exchange and dev will also discuss how much fees that must be paid by the team as a part of requirements. 
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
Jump to: