Pages:
Author

Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 5. (Read 1719 times)

member
Activity: 789
Merit: 10
In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 284
probit at this moment be most favourite exchanges for new projects. most of them now listing there , and slow but sure it will influence probit reputation in cryptocurrency market. new project that want to list in best exchanges such as binance or huobi it will take long time till their team review its quality good enough or not.
not a quality problem for the project. if the project is already good their problem is the cost of making a sale or listing on an exchange. lower cost is the choice. and of course, for a good project. they have to do a very tight event to boost their rapidly growing trade.
It was their choice to choose low-cost, low-cost exchanges as long as tokens could be listed on the exchange, but strong and large projects they would continue to do their best to develop with sufficient funds they would definitely be listed on the exchange more.
full member
Activity: 431
Merit: 100
probit at this moment be most favourite exchanges for new projects. most of them now listing there , and slow but sure it will influence probit reputation in cryptocurrency market. new project that want to list in best exchanges such as binance or huobi it will take long time till their team review its quality good enough or not.
not a quality problem for the project. if the project is already good their problem is the cost of making a sale or listing on an exchange. lower cost is the choice. and of course, for a good project. they have to do a very tight event to boost their rapidly growing trade.
full member
Activity: 899
Merit: 101
It's true that all new project team can'tt afford top exchanges because of those exchanges are so much expensive but they can launch their IEO From mid ranged exchange like Kucoin, Hitbtc, Houbi, probit. This action can increase the chance of IEO's Success
Of the four intermediate exchanges that you said, only Probit has received many IEO programs from new projects and the average tokens are also listed there, besides none and even just one or two projects have managed to make IEO in Kucoin, and for Hitbtc and Huobi I have never seen IEO there again.
probit at this moment be most favourite exchanges for new projects. most of them now listing there , and slow but sure it will influence probit reputation in cryptocurrency market. new project that want to list in best exchanges such as binance or huobi it will take long time till their team review its quality good enough or not.
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 579
It's true that all new project team can'tt afford top exchanges because of those exchanges are so much expensive but they can launch their IEO From mid ranged exchange like Kucoin, Hitbtc, Houbi, probit. This action can increase the chance of IEO's Success
Of the four intermediate exchanges that you said, only Probit has received many IEO programs from new projects and the average tokens are also listed there, besides none and even just one or two projects have managed to make IEO in Kucoin, and for Hitbtc and Huobi I have never seen IEO there again.
sr. member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 256
The exchanges have become greedy middlemen. I think to list a coin at Binance you have to pay them 2 million dollars, or some ridiculous number like that. It just feels like such a waste, money that should go into the project. Bitcoin in the beginning wouldn't had been able to listed in the begining.
The main thing is not in the Exchange, but in the concept because if we know that even a large Exchange can only survive at the beginning, it cannot provide many benefits, so the important thing is that the main concept becomes an important point. Paying exchanges is also not cheap right now, as you mentioned
member
Activity: 372
Merit: 10
It's true that all new project team can'tt afford top exchanges because of those exchanges are so much expensive but they can launch their IEO From mid ranged exchange like Kucoin, Hitbtc, Houbi, probit. This action can increase the chance of IEO's Success
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 250
Hodlers Network
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

ICO, STO or IEO is just a kind of fundraising methode
and i think for now IEO is the best methode, but only if the IEO running on top exchange like binance
the issue is not with the methode, but the team because if they want to reach the cap
the team must serious with their project and bring new ideas and features to their project
i believe even they choose an ICO as their fundraising methode a lot of investors will drop their money, the key is trust  Wink
i hope someday the glory of ICO will comeback
dx5
sr. member
Activity: 303
Merit: 251
The exchanges have become greedy middlemen. I think to list a coin at Binance you have to pay them 2 million dollars, or some ridiculous number like that. It just feels like such a waste, money that should go into the project. Bitcoin in the beginning wouldn't had been able to listed in the begining.
full member
Activity: 573
Merit: 102
I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

It's really hard now for low capital start up because it all depends on the exchange you are able to afford to list your IEO on as people prefer to trust the decision of major exchanges such as binance, okex, kucoin and gate.io in choosing quality project for IEO's due to too many bad choices they've made personally when it comes to choosing project to invest in.
full member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 101
if the project is not able to do an IEO in the top exchange, the way to solve the problem is just to attract a few large investors and several large partners, I mean they have to take part in some blockchain events first, after they have enough funds they can register on a large exchange to start IEO
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 513
Moonbet.io | Web3 Casino
Listing on binance is way too expensive for new projects, it will be easier for those new projects that have private investors, they can easily arrange for funds to list on top exchanges, it's just advisable to build crypto projects when you are fully ready and qualified
That's why a lot of projects are looking for alternative exchange sites to replace binance as another option. Even binance dex was also putting very strict requirements.
Major exchange sites are the things that are not so many developers can afford them instantly.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
Listing on binance is way too expensive for new projects, it will be easier for those new projects that have private investors, they can easily arrange for funds to list on top exchanges, it's just advisable to build crypto projects when you are fully ready and qualified
copper member
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
For new, but also existing projects, lisiting on an exchange like Binance can be way to expensive.
If, for instance, a project chooses not do do an ICO or pre-mine the likelyhood of a starting capital is slim.
And with the low volumes of money flowing through the whole of this cryptospace the last couple of years many coins will stay in this difficult situation.
Take a project like BCZ (BitcoinCZ), skillful DEV team, in front regions of development.....but little money to get to the big league of Exchanges.
Crypto as a whole should be working towards more adoption.
On the otherhand i am more for decentralized exchanges taking the lead instead of exchanges like Binance being centralized.
member
Activity: 821
Merit: 20
SOL.BIOKRIPT.COM
There has more successful chance a project if want IEO progress in popular exchange. Even not few because there has lots of investors in popular exchange. In my opinion if a project want alive long term then their need popular exchange for increase investors, volume, and price.
sr. member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 259
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
This is one of the few reasons why I trust binance, they are very careful before taking up a project to list on their exchange platform, it's not always about the money, it's more about the quality of projects
They prioritize the quality of the projects. If the projects are of good quality and have products, they will list them in exchange.If they do not have enough money to pay for binance then I believe that Binance will open a contest of votes among projects.
member
Activity: 634
Merit: 10
Not all projects need to be in a top exchanges for it to be considered as a good project. Some projects still works out even in a not so famous exchanges. Sometimes it's better to take step by step process in order for somethings to work. As time pass by and the usefulness of a project can be seen, in time, it will be on top exchanges too, that will still happen if the team behind it and the goal of the project can be meet and achieve.

 
full member
Activity: 887
Merit: 100
only good projects, have quality products and have large funds that can be listed at the top of the exchange. Such project criteria usually bring great success in the market. Project teams and project partners have a large influence on the success of a project, especially for IEO listed on the main exchange.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 19
Being listed on a exchange as an coin isn't all about the money. Exchanges also look at the reputation of the project. Because if they don't and the coin turns out to be a scam then that exchange that listed it will face the consequence. So if you look at Binance the coins there is quality. Because you need money and trust to get listed.
This is one of the few reasons why I trust binance, they are very careful before taking up a project to list on their exchange platform, it's not always about the money, it's more about the quality of projects
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 100

Investors are actually going to be investing if they see the project worth investing in.  A week ago many investors are grabbing Oikos token in hoo.com exchange as they did an IEO there. Although the price of BTC isn't going up, traders are up to invest a lot of projects in crypto. The Chinese are more aggressive in investing in their exchanges and this is why more Chinese exchanges are suddenly coming out from the shadows.
investment may start crowded. but not for projects listed on the small exchange. or projects that sell their IEO on a small exchange. of course, there are considerations of the best exchanges for doing IEO. it will get support from strong communities and markets. it will be good for the stability of the price of the token.
Pages:
Jump to: