Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 4.

witbla

newbie

Activity: 154

Merit: 0

Quote from: hwteeer on June 25, 2020, 04:57:51 PM

Afternoon. I absolutely share your views here. And talking about you, are there many promising tokens and platforms you are now following and can recommend? I only have 2 or 3 most advanced ones I am aware of, so always interesting to get a real recommendation

Well, the one I can definitely recommend you to have a look at is Centric token. This is entirely new standards on the field with really saturated roadmap

hwteeer

newbie

Activity: 112

Merit: 0

Quote from: witbla on June 25, 2020, 04:57:34 PM

Hey. I wouldn't say that we can be talking about all altcoins at once. From my point of view, much depends on the concrete platform/token and its particular prospects. And it is important to differentiate. Because again, only own and concrete analysis allows to get an objective overview

Afternoon. I absolutely share your views here. And talking about you, are there many promising tokens and platforms you are now following and can recommend? I only have 2 or 3 most advanced ones I am aware of, so always interesting to get a real recommendation

witbla

newbie

Activity: 154

Merit: 0

Hey. I wouldn't say that we can be talking about all altcoins at once. From my point of view, much depends on the concrete platform/token and its particular prospects. And it is important to differentiate. Because again, only own and concrete analysis allows to get an objective overview

aioc

hero member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 567

Quote from: Dariusburst on June 15, 2020, 11:32:39 AM

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

That has become the sad reality that every project should accept, they will have to take a chance in ICO if they cannot afford an IEO or they cannot get in the top exchange for IEO, they will have to rely in the reputation of their project, on how the team manage to convince investors to invest even if they are running in ICO platfrom.

bearexin

full member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 168

Quote from: Dariusburst on June 15, 2020, 11:32:39 AM

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

Well, you can’t have both at a time. You will have to be choosing one out of the two, either you choose ICO or IEO. Big exchanges knows what it costs them to reach that level they are now and they won’t doing anything for you for a penny, they will be charging huge for it. The good thing is that you will always see the difference between making use of the bigger exchanges and the smaller exchanges, there will always be a difference there.

Although I don’t think ICOs are dead, despite all these things that have happened, you will still see lots of ICOs, and there are still good ones. By saying this, I do not mean you can go for ICO for profitable experience. It is still up to you and purely depending on your due diligence. All the projects who could not convince big exchanges, may still prefer this platform for crowdfunding; if they're having good reasons then we can support them; I guess no big mistake in that.

someone703

full member

Activity: 944

Merit: 101

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

Quote from: Vitalicus on June 24, 2020, 01:04:26 AM

Quote from: Google+ on June 24, 2020, 12:43:27 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

It's true that top exchanges attract more investors but if the usecase of the project is unique ,the developers can decide to use some middle class exchanges and the project will still sell out as long as it has it's purpose not just a copycat, so everyone shouldn't run to top exchanges if they can't afford it.

to be listed at the best exchange is indeed very difficult because it requires a very large capital, whereas to enter the exchange where the class is still middle is enough but the trading volume will certainly be small because usually the whales and investors prefer trading at the exchange which has a high trading volume.

I agree! Not all new project can afford that. However, all of them probably will try as hard as they can to achieve that goal! Being listed on a high-trading volume Exchange (or large Exchange) helps a lot in attracting investors and participants. Therefore, I think there's no one will refuse it!

How can they try if the project does not have enough budget to develop? Those projects do not have any other options, they can only deploy IEO in small and medium exchanges. And it is these small exchanges that are killing new projects because investors are not interested in IEOs on this small exchange.

Suptiele

jr. member

Activity: 31

Merit: 1

ICO or IEO, the initial financing is important for the project and if it is not for them to obtain self-financing or without the need for community funding, the project will not see the light.
IEO will make things more difficult for scammers, but it does not a ticket for non scamming.
Therefore, you can lose your money if you trust that they are guaranteed and not just fraudsters.
you should try investing.

tvplus006

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 1655

To the Moon

Quote from: ameliana on June 19, 2020, 12:29:08 PM

only good projects, have quality products and have large funds that can be listed at the top of the exchange. Such project criteria usually bring great success in the market. Project teams and project partners have a large influence on the success of a project, especially for IEO listed on the main exchange.

To get a good listing on an exchange, there are only a few options available. Either a large investor comes to the project and pays for the listing, or the team independently raises money using the bounty. This was recently done by carthusia, which after the ICO held an IEO on the Binance exchange.

XCANA

full member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 148

Quote from: _IRMAN on June 17, 2020, 12:52:07 AM

Quote from: CuriousGeorge on June 17, 2020, 12:47:38 AM

Binance charges more than 3 million dollars for a new token to be listed on binance exchange site. Some projects were raising a lot of money able to do this but the small projects can't

Really ? How do you know that? I don't think binance has ever talked about listing prices to the public, I see a few coins listing in binance and their volume is not up to 3 million dollars per day, so I think $3 million just for listing is too expensive.

Binance should reconsider there ways if of a truth they use to collect such amount from heir clients during the listing, this will some how defeat the purpose of getting good projects for listing. Those projects with good prospects should be accepted and treat as such without frustrating them out of business because of huge amount involve in the listing. Binance should ensure to help good projects get listing in their exchange. This will enhance credibility and transparency in the whole process of the projects.

Natalim

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 592

BTC to the MOON in 2019

We are seeing the reality, it's given that not all can afford to get their project listed for an IEO in top exchanges.
Just like a real market, there are big projects and there are small projects, when we talk of top exchanges, that entails big money, so it's not possible all can afford. The worst case here is if investors will only judge the project in short term, then most likely they will see that projects listed in small exchange has less chance to be successful.

Maybe what we are waiting here is the altcoins season, because the last time it happened, investing in altcoins are very profitable and I don't know if we ever experience that again but I'm hoping we will.

DDante

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 19

Quote from: bassbity on June 15, 2020, 01:21:06 PM

Quote from: CashbackLover on June 15, 2020, 11:47:55 AM

It's true that not all new projects can afford top exchanges but we have few exchanges that aren't that costly for IEO like binance or okex, here are some exchanges that are still good and less costly

1. Hoo.exchange
2. Probit exchange
3. Upbit
4. Bithumb

These exchanges still have good results of past IEO projects

Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO with low projects but they look for quality even Upbit and Bithumb rarely do IEO except probit and other low exchanges. Every new project they always accommodate, even though many failures occur.

That's why Probit is losing its reputation bit by bit, if the exchange team keeps allowing anyhow projects on their exchange the exchange will lose its rank in crypto space to other small exchanges, upbit and bithumb are marginally better than Probit exchange in terms of picking IEO projects

ILScoin

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 10

That's is why there are smaller CEX exchanges where they can list on, not a must for all projects to list on either binance or other top exchanges, there are dex exchanges with good volumes, funds raising might not be a good idea because investors might think that they are scammers, if you don't have a solid project that people will invest in or you don't have fund to finance it, it's better for such person to stay out of it so that investors will not loose money

Vitalicus

full member

Activity: 467

Merit: 100

DIA | Data infrastructure for DeFi

Quote from: Google+ on June 24, 2020, 12:43:27 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

It's true that top exchanges attract more investors but if the usecase of the project is unique ,the developers can decide to use some middle class exchanges and the project will still sell out as long as it has it's purpose not just a copycat, so everyone shouldn't run to top exchanges if they can't afford it.

to be listed at the best exchange is indeed very difficult because it requires a very large capital, whereas to enter the exchange where the class is still middle is enough but the trading volume will certainly be small because usually the whales and investors prefer trading at the exchange which has a high trading volume.

I agree! Not all new project can afford that. However, all of them probably will try as hard as they can to achieve that goal! Being listed on a high-trading volume Exchange (or large Exchange) helps a lot in attracting investors and participants. Therefore, I think there's no one will refuse it!

Google+

hero member

Activity: 2464

Merit: 550

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ?? on ??

It's true that top exchanges attract more investors but if the usecase of the project is unique ,the developers can decide to use some middle class exchanges and the project will still sell out as long as it has it's purpose not just a copycat, so everyone shouldn't run to top exchanges if they can't afford it.

to be listed at the best exchange is indeed very difficult because it requires a very large capital, whereas to enter the exchange where the class is still middle is enough but the trading volume will certainly be small because usually the whales and investors prefer trading at the exchange which has a high trading volume.

bitkanu

hero member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 513

Moonbet.io | Web3 Casino

Quote from: Vishnu.Reang on June 23, 2020, 01:14:06 PM

Quote from: Jancuki on June 23, 2020, 12:59:10 PM

In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.

One advantage with IEO is that the promoters can't accumulate the funds and then vanish all of a sudden. If the project doesn't reach the soft-cap, then the funds will be returned to the investors. But the problem is that once the token gets listed, it can't give any guarantee about the continued development of the project. After the listing, the exchange doesn't have any power over the project.

In some cases the amount that already raised have not returned to the investors as the exchange sites were still launching the token to be traded on the exchange site. Any platforms have its own policy and that depends on the agreement that has already created before.

Shallow

sr. member

Activity: 938

Merit: 255

SmartFi - EARN, LEND & TRADE

I am always of the mindset that IEO must not be on top exchanges, yes there are team who can afford it and there are others that can't, so those that cannot does it mean they should fold up their ideas? NO, rather they can go for other exchanges first. Also, the only challenge facing most projects is that they don't have any applicable use case thus when investors see them they tend to turn the other way. Which then means that, once a project have an applicable use case it can have a successful IEO on any exchange. Lastly, other exchanges that I think are friendly in terms of IEO are Probit, Bithumb and Kucoin.

ScamViruS

hero member

Activity: 1806

Merit: 720

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Jancuki on June 23, 2020, 12:59:10 PM

In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.

This is also a huge business. If IEO is listed in any big exchange, it creates a positive aspect in everyone. This is because they know that if they fail for any reason, their funds will be refunded. But the problem starts after the listing, the pump and dump game continues as the team pays more attention to the pump dump than to the development. So if team don't do development, the exchange can't have much impact after ieo.

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: Dariusburst on June 15, 2020, 11:32:39 AM

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

What about if those new projects stop asking for millions of dollars when they have yet to write a single line of code? That would be a welcome change if you ask me, bitcoin the most popular coin in the market by far was created by satoshi without the need of an ico or an ieo, do you want me to believe that since then developers need millions of dollars just to make their projects when most of the time their work is based on the work already done by satoshi? I do not buy it, and many investors seems to think the same as well as the popularity of those projects has dropped considerably during the last years.

Vishnu.Reang

sr. member

Activity: 1974

Merit: 453

Quote from: Jancuki on June 23, 2020, 12:59:10 PM

In my opinion, most investors choose to take part in the IEO and that too is done in large markets. Because they feel safer when they are about to spend money. As for if there are alternatives other than IEO in large markets, I think using the trusted Escrow service can be a solution.

One advantage with IEO is that the promoters can't accumulate the funds and then vanish all of a sudden. If the project doesn't reach the soft-cap, then the funds will be returned to the investors. But the problem is that once the token gets listed, it can't give any guarantee about the continued development of the project. After the listing, the exchange doesn't have any power over the project.

Greatdev

member

Activity: 266

Merit: 16

Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin

Quote from: Dariusburst on June 15, 2020, 11:32:39 AM

I'm glad we have IEO for new projects to raise funds successful after ICO did lots of damages to investors trust but that's not all, I want something that can help new upcoming projects to raise funds easily, for IEO if you don't have enough money for top exchanges there is 70% chances that you will come out with a bad result...

What do you think could solve this? New Fund raising?

Not all exchanges are unaffordable, there are both new and old exchanges that are good enough if you can't afford exchanges like binance and Okex, how about bithumb or upbit or even Probit? They are affordable and better than useless exchanges like p2pb2b

Topic: Not all new project team can afford top exchanges - page 4. (Read 1706 times)