Pages:
Author

Topic: NPlusMiner - |MultiRig remote management|AI|Autoupdate|Pool/Algo switching - page 28. (Read 37569 times)

member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
with hsr ? 1050ti 4 gb

We were talking about that issue a few posts up.  Cards older than 1060 don't work with HSR.  You'll have to use CcminerKlaust as described in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32342559

Switched to CcminerKlaust in 2.1.1
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
Hi, I have problem, NPlusMiner still says Checking version. On 2.1 and 2.1.1 the same problem, on 2.0.3 it just works fine. The problem appears after I change my wallet and restart it. The first run is alwas fine.
Please help, thanks.
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
Released NPlusMiner 2.1.1
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases

- Updated Claymore to 11.5
- Changed Miner for Neoscrypt to ccminerKlaust
- Updated ccminerKlaust to 8.21
- Fixed ActiveMinerGainPct
- Fixed BTC/Currency in Console
- Support for running multiple instances
  - You could now run more than one instance of NPlusMiner on the same rig
  - Each instance must be placed in it's own directory
  - Miner has to be started prior the launch of the next instance
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
dear mr plus. Help me please understand the problem. "ActiveMinerGainPct" does not work for me. Shit!!!
https://reho.st/self/7c2cb2baf4542c2761f491fba18d2b95c7a7eaaa.jpg

Good timing Smiley
Just released 2.1 which fixes it.
https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
dear mr plus. Help me please understand the problem. "ActiveMinerGainPct" does not work for me. Shit!!!
https://reho.st/self/7c2cb2baf4542c2761f491fba18d2b95c7a7eaaa.jpg
member
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
Why is there not a hashrefinery in the run section list if I choose it from the config menu?
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
Just check \logs\switching.log prior restarting NPlusMiner. Last line will tell you.

I have auto start set, but what could help is if on first run there was some kind of marker added to the log, maybe something like: "-------------"
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
with hsr ? 1050ti 4 gb

We were talking about that issue a few posts up.  Cards older than 1060 don't work with HSR.  You'll have to use CcminerKlaust as described in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32342559
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
with hsr ? 1050ti 4 gb

Could you be more specific?
Not understanding the question?
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
HSR haven't recognized two card out of four.
Its enough that I delete the hsrhash.txt ( not sure of the name) and restart and the benchmarking only of that algo will be repeated ?

HSR isn't stable.  Crashing for everyone lately.

Edit: Link to fix: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32342559

Could you share the type of card?

I have 1080ti, but I don't think HSR is the problem anymore.  I think that the user in the other thread was having problems because of having older card.

I am thinking the possible problem that was causing my computer to auto reboot was with claymore, but only when trying to split gpus to run two different pools.

I think I found a way to know which algo causes an auto reboot.  Next time it happens I'll search the miner log for "30 sec" as that is the sleep time when the miner first starts.. then I'll look at the previous algo.  Everything seems stable again as now I have only one pool set for all the gpus.

If somehow there is a stable way to run two different pools at the same time, that would be nice for comparing pools.

Just check \logs\switching.log prior restarting NPlusMiner. Last line will tell you.
jr. member
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
HSR haven't recognized two card out of four.
Its enough that I delete the hsrhash.txt ( not sure of the name) and restart and the benchmarking only of that algo will be repeated ?

HSR isn't stable.  Crashing for everyone lately.

Edit: Link to fix: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32342559

Could you share the type of card?

I have 1080ti, but I don't think HSR is the problem anymore.  I think that the user in the other thread was having problems because of having older card.

I am thinking the possible problem that was causing my computer to auto reboot was with claymore, but only when trying to split gpus to run two different pools.

I think I found a way to know which algo causes an auto reboot.  Next time it happens I'll search the miner log for "30 sec" as that is the sleep time when the miner first starts.. then I'll look at the previous algo.  Everything seems stable again as now I have only one pool set for all the gpus.

If somehow there is a stable way to run two different pools at the same time, that would be nice for comparing pools.
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
HSR haven't recognized two card out of four.
Its enough that I delete the hsrhash.txt ( not sure of the name) and restart and the benchmarking only of that algo will be repeated ?

HSR isn't stable.  Crashing for everyone lately.

Edit: Link to fix: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.32342559

Could you share the type of card?
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
HSR haven't recognized two card out of four.
Its enough that I delete the hsrhash.txt ( not sure of the name) and restart and the benchmarking only of that algo will be repeated ?

Yes, you can delete HSRminer_NeoScrypt_HashRate.txt from the stats folder.
It will then benchmark this algo again.

Don't even need to restart NPlusMiner. Let it a couple cycles and it will see it needs to benchmark.
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
HSR haven't recognized two card out of four.
Its enough that I delete the hsrhash.txt ( not sure of the name) and restart and the benchmarking only of that algo will be repeated ?
member
Activity: 172
Merit: 10
I'm testing nPlusMiner 2.1.

I think it would be more accurate if Run-> Balance would not indicate the pool-Balance but the "Total unpaid" value.
Now earning shows a very low value continuously (<1 mBTC / d, 6x1070 GPU).

https://imgur.com/a/4bkeB

member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
I'm using the last one with gui, but still I have to press E...

The reference for flat isn't meaningless until you will pay your utility bill with crypto.
Just compare claymore dual with phoenix ( or claymore) mining just ethereum. If you don't take in consideration the  + 20 w you use minimum per card for doing dual, you can believe dual is better. And that's probably what yor software suggest. But its not the true.


yes, I was talking about the miner development fee, not yours.

back to example before, Clay dual 2 % + 1%( minimumNeo ) +20w per card against:0,65 %(phoenix)+ 1%(Neo)

That I know, but CCminer, HSR and so on , I don't know. And its not written anywhere  in the readme.


'Nite
member
Activity: 514
Merit: 11
Few request:

0) Please make something that if a algo doesn't produce any MH in 1.5 minutes, than it goes on hold, no matter what the benchmark say. Its make no sense accepting 5 % devfee if I loose 5 % time waiting for a not responding pool. Some algos pay well, but there is few "hashing" demand" or the pools are broken, whatever I don't want to delete ALL the algos, if I do, doesn't make sense to run Nplus . HSR and C11 for example
And  if I add it later, then I need to rebenchmark those

1) DO I really need to press E to show profit ? I am old, may be, but I al always not sure if I pressed it once and at the right moment. I suggest a thick box. If I check it, I want it. One rig is something , but 7 rigs to double check its different considering checking the pool

2)you wrote the BTC / euro exchange , and you have the mBTC close to  that I'm earning. May you make the calculation as well ?

Yes, I'm lazy. Btw, give a look at Megaminer way of estimating power cost. In fact:
 "

3) I, like few other people, have a dual billing system in function of the hour of the day. In fact I have a stupid bat that

"power up"  ( and change the OC ) of almost all the card when there is the switch between the two different cost

4 )I think that is fair to write, somewhere, which % of devfee(the software, not the gui) is asking. I am a little lost with all this algos


and last. I tried most of those mining helper, and yours is the only one that for now it can really help working




0 - That is a difficult one... thinking about it...
1 - Which version are you using. I'd suggest the last one with GUI
2 - No plan to do so, we're mining crypto. The reference to fiat is meaningless.
3 - No plan to take this into account yet
4 - not sure I understand. Are you talking about miner program fees?
Last - thank for the feedback. Keep it coming!
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 19
Few request:

0) Please make something that if a algo doesn't produce any MH in 1.5 minutes, than it goes on hold, no matter what the benchmark say. Its make no sense accepting 5 % devfee if I loose 5 % time waiting for a not responding pool. Some algos pay well, but there is few "hashing" demand" or the pools are broken, whatever I don't want to delete ALL the algos, if I do, doesn't make sense to run Nplus . HSR and C11 for example
And  if I add it later, then I need to rebenchmark those

1) DO I really need to press E to show profit ? I am old, may be, but I al always not sure if I pressed it once and at the right moment. I suggest a thick box. If I check it, I want it. One rig is something , but 7 rigs to double check its different considering checking the pool

2)you wrote the BTC / euro exchange , and you have the mBTC close to  that I'm earning. May you make the calculation as well ?

Yes, I'm lazy. Btw, give a look at Megaminer way of estimating power cost. In fact:
 "

3) I, like few other people, have a dual billing system in function of the hour of the day. In fact I have a stupid bat that

"power up"  ( and change the OC ) of almost all the card when there is the switch between the two different cost

4 )I think that is fair to write, somewhere, which % of devfee(the software, not the gui) is asking. I am a little lost with all this algos


and last. I tried most of those mining helper, and yours is the only one that for now it can really help working


Pages:
Jump to: