I'm loving the tweaking proposals for weighted shares. Not much to add to what has been suggested already, only to say that if it is possible to monitor which miners have been connected and for how long, then allowed for any downtime for connection problems, the miners who have been connected the longest get a % more increase than those who have only been mining a short time. Some kinda sliding % scale in an agreed boundary.
Shares is much easier to base it on than time spent connected and mining, just throwing this into the mix. BRAINSTORM!
If it can be agreed upon what scale to offer (an extra 0.1% - 1%, or whatever) then go from there. As to where the funding would come from, I have no problem with another % (again to be agreed upon) being taken from the block reward and distributed accordingly.
Topic: [NR 1] Triplemining.com <> BIG jackpot every week <> - page 37. (Read 113618 times)
the front page of the forum is filling up with Triplemining spam
and other new pools that think number of threads in forum = success mayndbe?
http:ozco.in has made it to 80-Ghash/s with only one forum thread
and other new pools that think number of threads in forum = success mayndbe?
http:ozco.in has made it to 80-Ghash/s with only one forum thread
One forum thread but you still spam that link in the majority of your posts to other threads so don't be too quick to judge.
Good luck to you guys.
I popped in for a second using mibbit, no problems for me.
How did you select the freenode server? I don't see it on the list.
Oh my mistake, must have skipped over a post or two and missed this
There already was one. #triplemining on freenode
It appears you cannot access Freenode via mibbit - but you can via http://webchat.freenode.net/
I popped in for a second using mibbit, no problems for me.
How did you select the freenode server? I don't see it on the list.
I popped in for a second using mibbit, no problems for me.
I was wondering about that, but couldn't find info about it anywhere. Thanks!
Edit: But it doesn't look like it can be easily accessed via Mibbit, as Freenode is not registered with them. That makes accessing the IRC require the hassle of running an IRC client. We'll see if I can bring myself past the laziness barrier.
Edit: But it doesn't look like it can be easily accessed via Mibbit, as Freenode is not registered with them. That makes accessing the IRC require the hassle of running an IRC client. We'll see if I can bring myself past the laziness barrier.
Upon request, I created a Triple Mining IRC channel. Come join us for some chat!
There already was one. #triplemining on freenode
Upon request, I created a Triple Mining IRC channel. Come join us for some chat!
80 hours... are you freaking kidding me? This is just too painful to watch.
Just a very unlucky day in general. Even big pools are running into 6-10 million share rounds all of a sudden.
How about this...
The early shares (under the 50% mark, to be determined after block is found) are weighted at 0.88%
and the later shares at 1.12%. What's the flaw in this thinking? Cuz I'm just typing out my ass-
ets here.
The early shares (under the 50% mark, to be determined after block is found) are weighted at 0.88%
and the later shares at 1.12%. What's the flaw in this thinking? Cuz I'm just typing out my ass-
ets here.
Where would MrSam get the funds to pay everyone who was mining the whole round, earning 1.12 x their normal share?
It wouldn't require additional funds. Currently the BTC for a found block is divided equally between the total shares submitted. If you submitted 5% of the shares for that round, you get 5% of the payout (minus the 1% fee). More total shares just means less payout per share. Those miners who received the 12% bonus would simply be treated as if they had 12% more shares - meaning that if they produced 20,000 shares during a round they would be treated as if they produced 22,400 shares and the rewards would be distributed based upon this new calculation.
Pyramid scheme and you already spammed the same shit on another thread.
the front page of the forum is filling up with Triplemining spamand other new pools that think number of threads in forum = success mayndbe?
http:ozco.in has made it to 80-Ghash/s with only one forum thread
That's forward thinking.
We don't really want to encourage reverse-pool-hopping, either, but I think this idea is a step in the right direction.
Since it has been estimated that pool hopping can deprive dedicated miners of about 12% of their income, what about this:
Every miner who was connected when the last block was found has each of their shares in the new round count as 1.12 shares as long as they remain connected. If they disconnect for more than 10 minutes any future shares they submit during that round do not receive the bonus. This provides incentive to continue mining until the block is found AND to keep mining through the next round.
Since it has been estimated that pool hopping can deprive dedicated miners of about 12% of their income, what about this:
Every miner who was connected when the last block was found has each of their shares in the new round count as 1.12 shares as long as they remain connected. If they disconnect for more than 10 minutes any future shares they submit during that round do not receive the bonus. This provides incentive to continue mining until the block is found AND to keep mining through the next round.
Where would MrSam get the funds to pay everyone who was mining the whole round, earning 1.12 x their normal share?
I don't think reverse-pool-hopping is really a big problem. It's too hard for hoppers to predict when a long block will end and come in at the right time. Leaving when a block is taking too long is much easier. Score-based systems that weight later shares to be worth more work well enough.
We don't really want to encourage reverse-pool-hopping, either, but I think this idea is a step in the right direction.
Since it has been estimated that pool hopping can deprive dedicated miners of about 12% of their income, what about this:
Every miner who was connected when the last block was found has each of their shares in the new round count as 1.12 shares as long as they remain connected. If they disconnect for more than 10 minutes any future shares they submit during that round do not receive the bonus. This provides incentive to continue mining until the block is found AND to keep mining through the next round.
Since it has been estimated that pool hopping can deprive dedicated miners of about 12% of their income, what about this:
Every miner who was connected when the last block was found has each of their shares in the new round count as 1.12 shares as long as they remain connected. If they disconnect for more than 10 minutes any future shares they submit during that round do not receive the bonus. This provides incentive to continue mining until the block is found AND to keep mining through the next round.
Is it possible to "weigh" the later shares more than the earlier shares?
Yeah, if you could convert it to a weighted score-based system and get it to work with the minipool referral system then I say go for it!
Is it possible to "weigh" the later shares more than the earlier shares?
Pyramid scheme and you already spammed the same shit on another thread.
I have been getting requests from people to ask me to set up a more score based system, against pool hopping.... Not sure what to do here ...
I'll step out of the shadows and reveal myself. Personally, I'm committed to Triple Mining. I think its a fun pool design, friendly members and has a great community feel. Assuming the pool doesn't go down, I don't want to mine anywhere else.
That said, I don't want to have lower earnings because I'm not pool hopping on slower rounds like others are. It is my feeling that those who are committed to mining with Triple Mining should receive the highest payouts; but I honestly have no idea how this could be fairly achieved.
Would a score based system or some other incentive to stick with Triple Mining make it more difficult to attract new people to the pool? I don't know. But honestly, I'd prefer to be part of a smaller dedicated group of miners rather than a bunch of pool hoppers. Am I alone in this?
I agree. If we're going to put in 80+ hours on a block like this one, I don't want pool hoppers taking any of what little we make from it through dedication.
I agree, i'm open for idea's on how we could work this out.
Jump to: