compartment != comparison
Greets from the very sociable non racist German Grammar ... dude.
Greets from the very sociable non racist German Grammar ... dude.
Thanks. I however has a degree in writing typos
Topic: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history) - page 141. (Read 530660 times)
Thanks. I however has a degree in writing typos
compartment != comparison
Greets from the very sociable non racist German Grammar ... dude.
Greets from the very sociable non racist German Grammar ... dude.
Fun part, I hired Gnosis away from ZC for 1BTC for about 3hours (Yes, he is so dedicated that I had to do that 
), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.
), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.What did you make him do?
Also,
could ANON implement the mini-blockchain of XCN? It's really neat feature.
In compartment to me, Gnosis has a degree in math. So I needed to confirm some math in my soon to hopefully (If theory is bulletproof) be released "CPIP-1 (Coin Protocol Improvement Proposal)" which would probably make our zerocoin implementation look like an entertainment tool in comparison. Specially if this (as I try to make it) won't require coins to hardfork, and would also create anonymity, and hopefully give answer on a trustless decentralized exchange.
It's no point in asking for more details before I on my own tell you more about it, I keep my cards away from copycats.
Please don't misread me. This is yet only a idea/theory of mine, and we will implement zerocoin as planned regardless of this CPIP-1.
Wrt XCN, haven't seen it but will now. Thanks for the tip.
I doubt the theory for the high price^^.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Question can be what is high price for you..
halving is at start of next year if I have good information?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7201347
Almost, the list isn't correct because back then some data changes on the BlockExplorer ...
(if you read on a few posts he explains it)
But yeah.. it takes quite a while until it halves again ...
In my view ANC has a pretty damn high reward... the coin reward should have been halved earlier ... and later not a halving .. but with a lower pace so the curve would be more of a straight line instead of a concave thingamajig
I doubt the theory for the high price^^.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Question can be what is high price for you..
halving is at start of next year if I have good information?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7201347
I doubt the theory for the high price^^.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Anoncoin has a long way to go until the block halves again. It's not even mined half way trough. I would like to purchase some Gigahashes to mine but Im not capable of finding a good reliable cloudservice ... plus the algo changes soon.
Moon is just 1st station
Did you really just mention "moon" here in this Anoncoin thread... ^^
I wanna punch somebody.
No I'm not
I just want to promote https://wiki.anoncoin.net/Anoncoin_Wiki
and I'm noticed that have 50 or more views per day,
thanks to lunokhod2 and geekz!
EDIT:
@SmokingSkull , I was ask my friend whats the problem with moon...
he thinks it is Doge talk, but he is not sure...
I heard about that fraze in summer 2012 (btc talk with my friends),when Doge was not planed, and I'm not reading they .talk
sorry for moon
btw, with 10% of Doge community and PR, today we would have 100$ per ANC
I know Pablo
, and many of us don't want high price, but it is true.Regards
Moon is just 1st station
Did you really just mention "moon" here in this Anoncoin thread... ^^
I wanna punch somebody.
Great news, I feel all eyez on ANC , or will be soon, finally!
Volume go up last 24h, China trade volume like Cryptsy day before..
And thats made by 1-3 bigger buyers.
What will be when there be 10 or 100+ of them..
Moon is just 1st station
@meeh, go sleep, you are funny after 78h without sleeping
Volume go up last 24h, China trade volume like Cryptsy day before..
And thats made by 1-3 bigger buyers.
What will be when there be 10 or 100+ of them..
Moon is just 1st station
@meeh, go sleep, you are funny after 78h without sleeping
I'm currently making good progress on Zerocoin. I'm almost finished with adding RSA UFO support to the library, and then I can move onto other aspects of it, such as storage of zerocoins in wallets. I'll give an update on Saturday, September 13 about when I expect Zerocoin to be code complete. If no major problems are discovered, it won't be long before a hard fork where we actually add ZC support to Anoncoin and you all can start using minting and spending zerocoins.
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
I'll be looking forward to the update on September 13th. Hopefully then you'll present the final date without any extra delays. Implementing Zerocoin is no small feat
This is just to let everyone know that I have been having problems mining Anoncoin with FushionHash. I can only recommend that everyone avoid dealing with them.
In short:
1. Even though there are active miners (according to their web site), they haven't found a block in several weeks, and the last one they found has not yet been confirmed.
2. I tried to cash out my (small) balance, but after several weeks, they have not yet processes this.
3. I have sent multiple emails to them, and I have gotten no response.
In short:
1. Even though there are active miners (according to their web site), they haven't found a block in several weeks, and the last one they found has not yet been confirmed.
2. I tried to cash out my (small) balance, but after several weeks, they have not yet processes this.
3. I have sent multiple emails to them, and I have gotten no response.
anon.cryptcoins.net hasn't cracked a block in 1421+ hours. Nearly two months.
I now mine at anonmining.com. Slow but steady.
Fun part, I hired Gnosis away from ZC for 1BTC for about 3hours (Yes, he is so dedicated that I had to do that ), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.
), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.What did you make him do?
Also,
could ANON implement the mini-blockchain of XCN? It's really neat feature.
This is just to let everyone know that I have been having problems mining Anoncoin with FushionHash. I can only recommend that everyone avoid dealing with them.
In short:
1. Even though there are active miners (according to their web site), they haven't found a block in several weeks, and the last one they found has not yet been confirmed.
2. I tried to cash out my (small) balance, but after several weeks, they have not yet processes this.
3. I have sent multiple emails to them, and I have gotten no response.
In short:
1. Even though there are active miners (according to their web site), they haven't found a block in several weeks, and the last one they found has not yet been confirmed.
2. I tried to cash out my (small) balance, but after several weeks, they have not yet processes this.
3. I have sent multiple emails to them, and I have gotten no response.
Fun part, I hired Gnosis away from ZC for 1BTC for about 3hours (Yes, he is so dedicated that I had to do that ), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.
), so blame me for a 3h later release But if my math is correct it might been worth it.
Blockchain stuck again.
It really feels like it always gets stuck when I wanna load Coins onto my wallet.
It really feels like it always gets stuck when I wanna load Coins onto my wallet.
I'm currently making good progress on Zerocoin. I'm almost finished with adding RSA UFO support to the library, and then I can move onto other aspects of it, such as storage of zerocoins in wallets. I'll give an update on Saturday, September 13 about when I expect Zerocoin to be code complete. If no major problems are discovered, it won't be long before a hard fork where we actually add ZC support to Anoncoin and you all can start using minting and spending zerocoins.
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
my hero.Keep on going Gnosis! and tell us if you need anything!
A Monster or RedBull through Colouredcoins maybe?
hehe.Hah, thanks. I would like 1 redbullcoin plz
[...]
If the zerocoin algo, or its security, rely on the infeasibilty of factoring N to get primes P and Q then basically you are giving a shelflife to zerocoin. You are saying at some point in the future all previous transactions will be decrypted.
Considering the nature of math, of primes and so on, the algo is not likely to last long. Considering further the possibility that there may be entities with access to extremely high computing power i.e., supercomputers, it is a blind guess whether the algo will even be trustable the very day it is released.
This is no secret. The implementation of zerocoin into anc is either a deliberate scam or some sort of attempt to discredit it.
If the zerocoin algo, or its security, rely on the infeasibilty of factoring N to get primes P and Q then basically you are giving a shelflife to zerocoin. You are saying at some point in the future all previous transactions will be decrypted.
Considering the nature of math, of primes and so on, the algo is not likely to last long. Considering further the possibility that there may be entities with access to extremely high computing power i.e., supercomputers, it is a blind guess whether the algo will even be trustable the very day it is released.
This is no secret. The implementation of zerocoin into anc is either a deliberate scam or some sort of attempt to discredit it.
First of all, I am reluctant to reply to you since this is your first post and your account was registered 9 minutes before the post, therefore you are likely to be a troll.
These points should be addressed though. Zerocoin is founded on the assumption that the factorization and discrete logarithm problems are hard, and the rest is provably secure cryptography. The anonymity part does not depend on these assumptions: it is provably secure. The anti-forgery part of Zerocoin has a long shelf life: probably decades. This is plenty of time to find something better. There's no risk of de-anonymizing old transactions in the future, if I implement the algorithms correctly, which I will verify thoroughly before declaring ZC is safe to use for real world anonymity needs.
I'm currently making good progress on Zerocoin. I'm almost finished with adding RSA UFO support to the library, and then I can move onto other aspects of it, such as storage of zerocoins in wallets. I'll give an update on Saturday, September 13 about when I expect Zerocoin to be code complete. If no major problems are discovered, it won't be long before a hard fork where we actually add ZC support to Anoncoin and you all can start using minting and spending zerocoins.
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
my hero.Keep on going Gnosis! and tell us if you need anything!
A Monster or RedBull through Colouredcoins maybe?
hehe.
I'm currently making good progress on Zerocoin. I'm almost finished with adding RSA UFO support to the library, and then I can move onto other aspects of it, such as storage of zerocoins in wallets. I'll give an update on Saturday, September 13 about when I expect Zerocoin to be code complete. If no major problems are discovered, it won't be long before a hard fork where we actually add ZC support to Anoncoin and you all can start using minting and spending zerocoins.
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
When I started this project, I wanted to be completely transparent, and so all the commits were done in a public Github repository. Well, now I think that was a naive decision, since there is a lot of copying of features between coins. Therefore, I will release commits to the public on a 2 week lagging schedule. Since the first private commits were on September 3, you'll see those commits on Github on September 17 (8 days from now). They will be in the "zc" branch of our repo: https://github.com/Anoncoin/anoncoin/tree/zc
I think this is a good balance between transparency and business sense. It's not good to go to the extreme that Darkcoin went to, where they kept their DarkSend feature closed-source long after production software was released.
Also, see my last update, if you missed it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8599297
Quote
If the zerocoin algo, or its security, rely on the infeasibilty of factoring N to get primes P and Q then basically you are giving a shelflife to zerocoin. You are saying at some point in the future all previous transactions will be decrypted.
Considering the nature of math, of primes and so on, the algo is not likely to last long. Considering further the possibility that there may be entities with access to extremely high computing power i.e., supercomputers, it is a blind guess whether the algo will even be trustable the very day it is released.
This is no secret. The implementation of zerocoin into anc is either a deliberate scam or some sort of attempt to discredit it.
Hm, either new people really register and then post on this topic, or its all trolls with new accounts.
I like to remind you that the generation of private keys for Bitcoin and all other Coins also has limits (and If you use supercomputer to generate blablabla)
If you think that the "algo is not likely to last long" then you should not even be in CryptoCurrency at all due to the minor chance of stolen Coins.
Imagine that... cryptography has its limits. - Oh my god mind blown - Cryptography 101?
Jump to: