Topic: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history) - page 49. (Read 530669 times)

The logo is awsomely good!

Anonhog, are you interested to do an Anonymous theme? Can you contact Lunokhod or me (PM, mail: [email protected] or on IRC/I2P)?

N00n, can you contact Lunokhod or me for your noisy theme?

Alacast, can you contact Lunokhod or me?

Anyone who wish to contribute could you contact us

Ulfie: Good work!

Thanks lunokhod2! Nice to see some progress in github <3

Anoncoin now has themes for the Qt wallet

Thanks to Ulfie, Anoncoin now supports user defined themes for the Qt wallet. Here are a few examples, just to demonstrate that it really works: Examples

To experiment with themes, follow these instructions:

1. Download and compile the develop-themes branch on Github. Then copy the folder share/qt/themes to your anoncoin data directory. Alternatively, download the OSX developer build here, unzip, and then copy the themes folder to "~/Library/Application\ Support/Anoncoin/". Please note that the branch develop-themes will be merged with develop after the next round of commits by GroundRod.

2. Go to Preferences > Display, and choose a theme from the drop down menu. Click OK at the bottom of the screen.

3. To create your own themes, simply create a new folder in the themes folder, and create a style.qss file that is based on one of the examples.

That's it! A contest for the best community contributed themes will soon follow...

This rise in price is nothing to talk about really. xD


This rise is on very low volume, and what reason can there be?
People still can't be sure if work is really done on the code, since there are no github entrys it's just the same game as with every other coin out there.

Why buy this coin if no work at all is seen. Everybody can talk the talk, few walk the walk.

My guess is that it is just related to the PUBLIC announcement of Mullick that deposits and withdraws are working again on Cryptsy.

In terms of wallet release I know nothing more than what has been posted here and: https://wiki.anoncoin.net/Development_schedule

Why's that?
Insider buying some before new wallet launch??

Correct, it is hard to grab coins below 30k.

Still chugging along. Noticed a little market activity. yay

Is ANC getting momentum again?

ANC getting fire...

Sorry I didn't respond earlier, but I don't understand your question. Can you rephrase it?

If your transaction is on the blockchain, and there is still a problem, please contact coinmine.

If you get the coins you mined, you shouldnt worry

How should a newbie know that without getting a slap first?! 

you should ask them, not us

http://ancblockchain.com/b/132F27borY

Dear all. Any1 has a clue why block above and many more aren's synced with http://www.coinmine.pw/ multi pool?
Seems ok and it was paid out? 

Anonhog, this is nice graphic! Thank you!

We used to be accepted there, but at some point they removed us (without letting us know). I presume that the decision was based on cryptsy deactivating ANC withdrawals from their site. As soon as we get the new release out, I will contact them and see if they could add us again. In any case, you should pressure them as well.

It would be nice to see ANC acceptance through coinpayments.net
Has anyone made the suggestion to them?

Well, any 'truly' anonymous coin needs to be transmitted 'anonymously.' Right? Let us assume that it is undisputed that TOR has been compromised. The extent of such a compromise may be debated.
It is questionable if TOR has been compromised due to poor 'opsec' or due to the fact that nodes have been subverted. I would suggest it is both. Regardless, it is no longer trustworthy.
This results in the simple fact that TOR is vulnerable and therefore any coin utilizing it is also vulnerable. Whether your activity is such that sufficient manpower is necessary to find out who you are is a different kettle of worms. However, running million dollar drug empires seems quite frowned upon; lulz. Although it may still offer a modicum of anonymity to it's users, LEO have aptly shown TOR users they can bag'em and tag'em.

Enter stage left, ANC/i2p. Regardless of the technological improvements the coin ANC or any coin for that matter ultimately makes; you still are left with the issue of whether you have a secure transfer system or conduit. Even if ANC had met all of it's goals, if I2P does not offer a sufficient level of security; it fails. I would argue that assisting with the development of i2p would be against the interests of many people. Controlling pipes themselves seems to offer a strategic advantage over attempting to infiltrate a mesh network. The more people that decide to use a mesh network help both to sustain the system and weaken centralized control. I guess the question is, what's the good of making a super fast car, if you can't drive it and half of it's features are disabled. I would like to believe Meeh recognized these issues and decided to help lay the ground work for i2p. Others argue that ANC is just another failed dream/scam. I just wouldn't recommend building sand castles by the sea. $.02