[OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 # - page 37.

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

Quote from: TomCoin on January 15, 2014, 07:31:49 AM

hi guys i got 2 questions:

1)
i stopped mining at mid of dec.
but on jan 11th i got a small payment:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KJaJktJ9q1M12McyYSLKXhaqyASGXS4S5

but i didnt mine for approximately a month.

why did i get these coins?

2)
some of my earlier payouts are market as "generated" in my bitcoin-qt wallet.
https://blockchain.info/address/1KJaJktJ9q1M12McyYSLKXhaqyASGXS4S5
does that mean i earn the network fees produced by this coins? so does it make sense to throw them in the economy instead of holding in my wallet so they can produce fee for me? OR am i absolutely wrong? Please explain then.

Thanks

Shelved shares which were paid. See http://eligius.st/~gateway/faq-page/faq-4

joeventura

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

and.....we're back!

joeventura

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/eligius.st/

Stats server seems to be down

Still accepting shares however

TomCoin

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

hi guys i got 2 questions:

1)
i stopped mining at mid of dec.
but on jan 11th i got a small payment:
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1KJaJktJ9q1M12McyYSLKXhaqyASGXS4S5

but i didnt mine for approximately a month.

why did i get these coins?

2)
some of my earlier payouts are market as "generated" in my bitcoin-qt wallet.
https://blockchain.info/address/1KJaJktJ9q1M12McyYSLKXhaqyASGXS4S5
does that mean i earn the network fees produced by this coins? so does it make sense to throw them in the economy instead of holding in my wallet so they can produce fee for me? OR am i absolutely wrong? Please explain then.

Thanks

davebodger

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: kendog77 on January 14, 2014, 09:09:35 AM

Gosh, what a terribly unlucky round we're having. This round is now over 8 hours long and luck is at ~15%.

Looks like we got lucky at 14.5% - it could have been worse!

Cheesy

kendog77

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Gosh, what a terribly unlucky round we're having. This round is now over 8 hours long and luck is at ~15%.

helmax

sr. member

Activity: 440

Merit: 250

waiting new patch Grin

continue good work wk

joeventura

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 500

~~128 & 256 second stats are looking screwy~~

Returned to normal

davebodger

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

For those that have not seen it yet:- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.28042

0.99.2-E firmware allows you to easily use bfgminer on November Jupiters. Hooray! Grin

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

I'm doing a manual payout soon. I'm just running some verification on the last few days of share log data before I do.

-wk

davebodger

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: smooth on January 10, 2014, 07:51:45 PM

Are payouts backed up or stuck or is this something specific to my account?

Mostly we seem to be queuing behind 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX who wants 7 block's worth of payment. Shocked

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Are payouts backed up or stuck or is this something specific to my account?

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

Quote from: lenny_ on January 10, 2014, 06:19:15 PM

On this version of your cgminer - cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222 - you disabled work flushing? For how long after work restart cores are still reporting old work (doing rejects)?
Is it possible to do opposite thing, and optimize flushing so Jupiters will work better on alternative coins with more frequent work restart signal, or with p2pool (30s work restart)?

I'm working on fixing flushing, but there may be a hardware issue at work preventing me from doing so.

Disabling flushing doesn't have a set length of time where cores still report old work. Some immediately are finishing old work and start working on new work, others take a few seconds or more depending on if they recently started the old work or not.

-wk

lenny_

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

DARKNETMARKETS.COM

On this version of your cgminer - cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222 - you disabled work flushing? For how long after work restart cores are still reporting old work (doing rejects)?
Is it possible to do opposite thing, and optimize flushing so Jupiters will work better on alternative coins with more frequent work restart signal, or with p2pool (30s work restart)?

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

My cgminer binary will get slightly higher rejects but much much lower HW errors. The tradeoff seems to work out well, though. The spewing of HW error messages is normal, just a debugging thing I added. Every single HW error has info shown for it, which is why there are a lot of messages.

You can save a little sanity by running cgminer without the console or normal console output. Just add -q -T to the end of starting command. (The one where you specific the location of cgminer.conf)
This still shows the HW error messages, but nothing else.

-wk

CeeCee

full member

Activity: 237

Merit: 100

i have tried your cgminer version and for the last 5 minutes cgminer shows me an average plus of around 15GH/s on my two october units. don't tried your binary beforce because i was thinking it is only helpful for november units. lets see what the next 12h will show me on the stats page. did you suggest to use october units too on port 12234? and i have also a loooooot of these hw error debug messages.

merv77

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

1.21 GIGA WATTS

thanks wizkid..
rejects seem on the rise, but I I'm liking the extra hash rate Grin

I'll report back after 12 hour run.
Cheers

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

Yes. Its debugging output I added.

merv77

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

1.21 GIGA WATTS

Quote from: gravityz3r0 on January 10, 2014, 06:27:31 AM

Quote from: lenny_ on January 10, 2014, 01:32:15 AM

Quote from: gravityz3r0 on January 10, 2014, 12:36:45 AM

Thanks for your hardwork and efforts wk,

For your information, your dev patch for Nov Jupiter is already almost as perfect as it can be. It's even better than any KnC firmwares they have churn out so far, and even better than your own dedicated KnC server. They should really hire you as their staff. Hehe!

Where this patch can be found?

I found this from another KnC thread. This is the link to the file posted by wk himself :

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4229913 (post #235)

If you are wondering how to apply it to the Nov Jupiter, you need to have access to SSH and enter the following command :

Code:

wget http://vpn.wizkid057.com/nas/cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222
chmod +x cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222
screen -dm ./cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222 -c /config/cgminer.conf
screen -d -r

To restore, just reboot your machine or reflash stock KnC firmware. You will know it's working if you see the CGminer version is upgraded to 3.8.5 which is provided by wk patch.
Stock 0.99E run 3.8.1, and the newer 0.99.1E runs 3.9.0. I find his patch perform better on the stock 0.99E firmware.

I've tried 'cgminer-binary-wizdev20131222' as described above in my October Jupiter and hash rate up from 550GH/s to 573GH/s, HW errors down from 1.8% to 0.7% and Rejects about 0.8%
(but not running very long yet, but I will re-post after running for 12 hours. BTW I'm runnig 0.95 firmware)

but I haven't seen this before in cgminer when viewing with 'screen -r'... eg. KnC: HW Error XXXXXXXX - work_id: XXXXX <-- is it normal to see many of these?

j03

member

Activity: 62

Merit: 10

Quote from: joeventura on January 10, 2014, 11:01:55 AM

Are the October Jupiters affected by this problem?

AFAIK, no. I have an October unit with 2 upgrade modules and it's doing just fine on firmware 0.99. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Topic: [OLD] Eligius: ASIC, no registration, no fee CPPSRB BTC + 105% PPS NMC, 877 # - page 37. (Read 458160 times)