You just have to remember: there is nothing is for free in that life. Somebody pays for it as taxes or other way. Yes, if you not willing to work and live on social help, you will get help, despite that you are a parasite.
I don't mind that my taxes go to help someone with the misfortune to get sick and without the resources to deal with it. I'm happy enough if I never get into that situation.
What pisses me off is that we have an extremely inefficient health care system largely because, IMO, it is for profit. More profit is to be made by charging more and giving less and skimming the middle. It's as plain as the nose on one's face.
I do not appreciate it at all that the government is complicit in forcing me into a situation where my tax dollars go not to people who need it but to and industry with useless parasite CEO's making $100k per day. This is classic 'merger of state and corporate power' and Obama is as good at it as anyone has been to date. It only takes a person who can complete a sentence to impress my liberal friends these days, and Obama is relatively good at that.
The FDA has a strong hand in this. Having exceeded the bounds of its reason for existence long ago, it has created a giant and expensive approval process that is also ineffective. The time it takes to bring new medicine to people has about doubled, from 8 years in the 1960's to about 15 years today and the cost is close to US$1B for a single drug.
http://reason.com/archives/2011/01/25/government-pillsAs a result, we get less innovation for a greater cost, and a large incentive to game the process. Less attention to more uncommon illness, and a proliferation of minor tweeks to existing medicine to prolong the patent protection without benefit.
Their process also increases medication shortages.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/02/13/health-care-leaders-drug-shortages-major-threat-patients/9XfOujrFRSEW5FBOkc1cmK/story.htmlBut worse even is that the FDA stranglehold doesn't end with the drug approval. The manufacturer must get approval for how much of a drug it plans to produce with its "output controls". We hear of fear of the "death panels". they are already here. Drs at John Hopkins had to ration cytarabine (treatiing leukemia and lymphoma) deciding who will live and who will die because of the FDA controls. Other centers were less lucky and ran out completely.
http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2011/06/08/rx-drug-shortages-regulation-can-be-deadly/And the FDA creates artificial monopolies. "17P" was used for years to help expectant mothers from having pre-mature births, made by pharmacists cheaply for $10 a dose by low income families, until a company called Hologic got the FDA to approve this progesterone fomula and got exclusive rights to it, raising the cost to US$1500 per dose (US$30000 per pregnancy).
The costs are really because of private for profit enterprise? More so the costs are because "private enterprise" can wield the power of government against the rest of humanity to enrich themselves. Where you put the blame sort of depends on whether you think government should be doing this sort of thing in the first place, or on the other side, whether you think government should be doing everything and we should all be working for government. It is the weird blend that some people think of as "private enterprise" (that is in reality anything but that), which is the source of the problems.
This gets compounded year by year because any failure of the system is used as an excuse to increase the system, until the system becomes too-big-to-fail, and then fails.
Putting our health in the sole hands of policy makers is wise, up until it isn't, but in the long run, we are all dead.