Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 3. (Read 11923 times)

Looks like it's taking a long time for Quicksy to come up with an excuse as to why his "proof" and "sources" haven't been validated by anyone else.

But we're not in a hurry, let's wait.

I would call you a retard, but then I would be offending actual retards. The amount of bullshit you post is beyond my ability to comprehend. I wondered where you got your 2 merit from and I chuckled when I realized 50% of your awarded merit comes from Quickseller. At least I understand why you're so eager to defend him now!

The burden of proof always lies upon the person making the claim, and yet we haven't seen anything that would support Quickseller's baseless accusations.

On a side note, I'm so happy that this thread is back on the 1st page, it's my current go-to comic relief!

What is being conducted to put his name in community areas by just eliminating Tax id name etc, You have informed so many factors Lauda is more reliable, trustable, but it's all b. s..

Is this a good time to mention that I own the domain name SexAlt.com . I could use this to record and measure various things about alts.

We can have an altimeter to monitor the number of alt used by a member
Then there is an alterer who changes the facts
Of course we mustn't forget the altruist who dispenses merits

I found this thread a bit taxing which is why I have introduced some levity. Tell me if I should stop because I have the wrong altitude, I'd hate to start an altercation.

Let me bump this through this tax nonsense. Sounds like a reasonable thing to do, Quicksy?

Here's a quick list of unproven allegations you've been throwing around recently, feel free to add:

• Lauda is a pill addict
• Lauda committed tax fraud
• Lauda has 6 alts that added Lauda to their trust lists
• The Pharmacist is Lauda's alt
• X is Lauda's alt, where X is not a publicly known Lauda's alt

(you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with other people's alts despite being a known puppeteer yourself... but I digress)

Here is a historical note for you.

Income tax was an invention of the English. In 1489 Henry VII tried to introduce a tax on income to finance a war against the French  He needed about £100,000, but he made it too complex, and quite a few people didn't want to pay it ( now there is a surprise. ). In fact he only managed to raise about £30,000.

If you want to find out more, then there is lots on this page -
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/tudor-england/henry-vii-and-extraordinary-revenue/

Note - there is no evidence that Lauda attempted to evade paying tax to King Henry VII.

With the exception of only a handful of countries, mostly in Africa, none of which lauda has any connection to, all countries require citizens to pay income taxes on global income.

If Lauda was Canadian it is entirely possible they paid their taxes in bitcoin

https://globalnews.ca/news/3994680/bitcoin-cra-scam-8000/

Lauda would also have to be dumb as bricks. ( Not suggesting this)

This thread is like a train wreck I can't bring myself to stop coming here and looking.

I am so far out of all these issues. I don't care about Lauda's taxation habits, and I don't think it is anybody else's business either.
 The only thing that would interest me is if he paid his taxes using Bitcoin.

I presume you were told that by someone very reputable, a trusted 3rd party, an anonymous source, a friend of a friend?

Why do you have this insane notion that someone would willingly post their location and tax details to a public forum?

No you aren't cleared at all and bragging into more posts, Can you clearly mention which part of country does Lauda belongs and what is his TAX ID?

In the past pages people have posted 42, does we are mentally treated or your gang?

Ill correct with Grammar and I will look for future attacks by you and the Redpainter alt account.

zzzzz.. fell asleep a little reading that bit.


what he said..

I thought we cleared up the nativity ≠ location ≠ language knowledge situation.

If that's what you're referring to, anyway. I don't really understand what you're trying to say: maybe you should pop your posts into a grammar checker before clicking that post button.

That Announcement Bumping scammer doesn't had a proof except my name in Mysterious list, did you count how many posts that are made in Date coin by me or others? I don't have a connection with Mysterious at all, there was another guy who used to run those scum things.

Announcement bumping offer and Redpainter etc have nothing to do with me.
Bumping means have to bump thread, but the idiot hired us for answering them, however didnt made wrong.
Although Lauda put the Tag, but here in this one forum only people use trust. Do you seen how does Atriz do shady business?
Do you know this guy Result who is your gang along with Upsilon Trooper. Famous for ICO bumping ,
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/result-1374485

Shit Gang never learn lessons, although please tell your lauda to ask that scammer.

Coming to the topic your Lauda didnt agreed as Croatian and filing tax.

Lauda's neutral point by Shorena

This rating was changed to neutral after two months, because Lauda (as well as others involved) did so in the intention to help the community. I do not condone this kind of behaviour, but I also have hope that Lauda learned from this mistake.

I'm sorry to break this to you, but your word is worthless. You have lied so many times that nobody should trust anything you say without solid evidence.

It's funny how within the same post you say "I am not making this up" and then proceed to lay out a scenario which (in your mind apparently) excuses you for making it up.

Or to put it another way - even if what you're saying were true, you're actually discrediting it with your slimy dishonest trollery and the obvious bias you have against anything Lauda does or says or looks at.

If you had a real source or real proof you could show it to a trusted member and get them to corroborate your story. What's your excuse for not doing so?

I didn't say proof is not important, you are twisting my words. I very clearly said that my source is not important. The evidence is my word that I have been told this information by someone who wishes to not be named. I am not making this up.

It isn't like it matters either way because those types of chat logs are nearly impossible to authenticate, and lauda will just argue what he was saying is "random gibberish" like he did when defcon23 came out with extortion claims, of course he will only do this if he is forced to comment on any presented chat logs, his first reaction will be to attempt to derail the conversation with trolling.

I am not sure why you, or anyone else would be surprised when someone does not want to be a public source of negative information about lauda. I am not sure if you have noticed, but lauda will troll (nearly) every negative thread created about him, will never respond to any type of criticism professionally (based on his public behavior), and has given negative trust to many people for being critical of him. The trolling is much more intense for those who have a more significant reputation who are critical of lauda, and come from many people closely associated with him. I asked lauda a few months (?) ago how many threads about him he responded to in a way that addressed concerns raised about him in the (then) previous 3 (?) months, and the response I got was that none raised concerns that merited a professional response.

Speaking of wrong and confusing, do you have any timeline of when you're gonna try to man up and post


of Lauda being The Pharmacist's alt? Or a pill addict? Or a witch? Sorry if I'm forgetting something.

I hold Suchmoon and Lauda both in high regard.

you on the other hand cannot read rules and are happy to spam the forum with shit - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25592651

You’re wrong. Stop confusing people.