Topic: overwhelming consensus excludes Lauda, remains in DT2, went in2 buz w sold act - page 31. (Read 11909 times)

Against newbies?  You really are a fucking idiot.

Which part is not true?


Seems all of it is 100% true.  Which part of my repeated attempts to help you do you dispute?



Lauda, you attempted to extort someone going as far in your desperation to try and dig up some dirt that you signed a message documenting your extortion.  You belong in jail.  



Not only did you discuss with me twice now about why you were excluded, I even provided the link to refresh your memory yesterday.  Is it really that hard to believe that people feel you guys are acting inappropriately and damaging the community by chasing away users with your crusade against newbies?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30244238

Three words: The scammers' vindication.

People what's happening here?!
People hated by people because they are just doing their tasks, gat red mark on the way because of some mistake, seriously?  Everything can be fixed by proper negotiation not debating right? Oh come, we are all grown up here, if someone was remove by their position by some people giving him red marks, and new person will be placed on the position, then some group just may repeat the process......

There wasn't a single serious complaint, thus a serious conversation couldn't have occurred.

You said it yourself, you've fixed most of the ratings that theymos didn't agree with (or type of rating). That leaves the following options:
a) You often agree with me (and/or have me in your trust list).
b) The account traders/farmers and other type of stuff you leave negatives for.

---

I'll let you take a guess. 50% chance you're right.

Why don’t you give one example of a public serious conversation about one of your trust ratings from the past month?

I never spoke ill of OgNasty or Tomatocage.  However, I have stated that Quackseller is a troll and a scammer, which I firmly believe.   So Og and Tomatocage excluding me from their lists?  Hmmm.

This is, obviously, a blatant lie. You’re so delusional.

I think this nails it right on the head. When a lot (or several) people have negative trust when they are in no way reasonably a scammer they will often be effectively excluded from the community, and will face difficulty conducting business. This problem is exaggerated when lauda refuses to have any kind of public discussion about his ratings when they are disputed.

In the past, members were removed from the default trust network after a single inaccurate rating.

Maybe you should take a look in the mirror with the following statement as the above is a vigorous lie.

You'd need to do a bit more than grill some dogs to be worthy of a "two year war".

You mean how I became the second in command (arguably first [1]) for Gunbot? Sounds right.

The rest are just either blatant misinterpretations or lies ("hurting for income"?) about the past. The people reading this don't even know what you're talking about, and those that do have been excluded from the trust system.

You absolutely have no valid reason to leave such a rating. Now we see the true intentions here. Playing the victim and setting up the play field for a false negative rating. Make it less obvious, will you? I'd expect theymos to easily see through these recent events and the actual intent behind them.

---

Now, back to the recent events.
The DT2 active members were lacking in number anyways, but were somewhat properly distributed in *protecting* several sections of the forum. The only remaining active user for Scam Accusations/Reputation and other shady action (sales, farming, abuse) is actmyname and there are a few that occasionally act (Vod, ibminer && similar). cryptodevil and suchmoon were/are active in the Altcoin section (and a few others). All three of them are 1 exclusion away from being kicked.
If TC follows OgNasty's exclusion (again), then the only remaining section with *some protection* would the Lending section where Vod is very active (and wherever actmyname *roams* assuming he doesn't get excluded for [insertInvalidRandomReason]).

We've almost reached the Utopia for scammers. Keep up the marvelous work. I'm sure the trio will be thanked by many legitimate shady members.

---

[1] Depending on how you view a feline-to-human marriage, I am arguably first in command.

Not trusting someone's ratings != thinking someone is untrustworthy.

if someone not trusting you anymore and excluding you from their trust list does not that mean their opinion for you is negative?

if so why none of them negged after kicked out?

See, you’re so delusional.  Obviously nobody should be valuing your opinion.  This constant war you’ve been trying to wage on me for nearly two years now has cost you your staff position (tell us why you were extorting zeroxal), your advertisers (Gunbot anyone), and now allegedly your inclusion into the DT network.  Why don’t you give us all a break and spend your time doing something positive that adds value?  The sad part is that I’ve been trying to help you throughout this.  When BG4 left you negative trust and ruined your rating, I stepped in to work it out and restore your trust.  When you were kicked out of the slack group I begged them to let you back in.  When you were hurting for income I gave you the idea for ACE.  When you didn’t understand how NastyFans worked, I gave you a free seat out of my pocket.  When you gave me reason after reason to leave you negative trust, I always gave you the benefit of the doubt.  Yet with each olive branch I get thorns back.  The only thing that baffles me is how anyone could be so ungrateful and self-sabotaging in an attempt to appease their own ego.

I'm not sure which one is cuter/sadder, that you think: a) You're a reputable user. b)  That this is an example of the system working.

---

If you believe this to be the case, make a thread to test your own and owlcatz' reputation and see what happens. Of course you wouldn't do that, inferiority is hard to overcome.

In a short word -titans of Bitcointalk forum are fighting. So, if you have nothing to add, better to stay away and just watch 

When you attack reputable users and spread lies, you shouldn’t be surprised when people stop valuing your opinion. There is no conspiracy here. People are getting sick of the bullying. Period. This is the trust system working.

Neither one of them was on DT, and making such statements =/= unfit for DT.

And you both were on DT? Unbelievable!

Sounds about right!

Maybe tomatoface is banging QS's mum? Then QS found out and got to do some dirty work for OG?