Now that lauda has been excluded from the Default Trust network due to three people trusted directly by DefaultTrust have excluded Lauda from their trust lists, I am calling on Blazed and hilariousandco to also remove Lauda from their trust lists.
Lauda is not someone who should be trusted by the community, between the trolling those who dispute his ratings, the extortion, the apparent pill addiction (that he has not denied) and other shady dealings, he is not someone who should have any kind of authority.
Some have argued that despite his overall very shadiness, Lauda is a net benefit to the community (which is a flawed reasoning), however many very reputable people in the community clearly disagree.
I would argue that if either Blazed or hilariousandco does not remove Lauda from their trust list in light of the above, they should be removed from being trusted directly by DefaultTrust.
edit:
Why don’t you give one example of a public serious conversation about one of your trust ratings from the past month?
There wasn't a single serious complaint, thus a serious conversation couldn't have occurred.
I think this statement proves my point pretty well.
I would like to hear both blazed and hilariousandco say they condone this kind of attitude and behavior because that is what they are doing by keeping lauda on their trust lists.
Do blazed and hilariousandco agree with the above attitude?
edit2: as of the last trust dump, nearly 100 people have excluded lauda from their trust lists. It is clearly the will of the community for laudas ratings to not show up by default. Will blazed, hilariousandco and salty follow the will of the community?
edit3: it appears as if at least
6 purchased accounts have added to lauda to their trust list, all owned by the same person.
) but most of them do deserve it. 