It's not a leap of logic. The majority of the world relies on regulations and governments. You propose to break with that convention, so the burden of proof lies on you--you're the one who is making the extraordinary claim.
But I'm not asking for proof--I'm willing to settle for a show. Unlike you, I am familiar with unregulated business--both the dysfunctional idiocy of Bitcoinland, and it's more competent IRL counterpart. I have offered you Bitcoin's creme de la creme--Bitcoin's biggest securities exchange and Bitcoin's first Bank. Along with every other business on that esteemed exchange.
Feel free to counter this with examples of non-drug related success stories.
Have you seen the state of the world lately? More regulations should fix what the regulations haven't fixed yet, though, I guess? Or maybe it's the proliferation of unlawful legal systems. All those upstanding regulators make such an effort to punish thieves and crooks, don't they?
I have a life outside of Bitcoin so I don't follow the industry, but I understand the technology and I've seen the positive energy going into positive projects. I don't focus on the failures and cheaters, they will exist with or without regulations. But I fail to see how the burden is on me to preserve what is natural. Centralized regulation/regulatory authority doesn't just exist, so I'm not arguing for its removal. You on the other hand are arguing for its creation and legitimacy. The burden rests on you to justify everything, not the other way around.
Bitcoin is unregulated business. Right now. It's doing just fine, and it will continue to do just fine without regulations if it were permitted to do so.