~snip~
agree with your statement. it makes sense that ChatGPT is not yet completely accurate because the AI still relies on input programming and for me it is more accurate to use the predictions of our own brains than leaving predictions to AI.
well, even though I've never tried it, to be honest I'm not sure if AI can provide good predictions. even though if we often bet on sports betting, of course we have predictions that are stronger and more accurate. because we are used to predicting a match and we definitely know which team has good performance which we should choose.
so it would be better to rely on your own predictions than AI predictions.
Well, our minds also rely on inputs we get from the real world, like watching games, or reading about statistics, or latest results, etc.
In a way, these AIs work quite similar to how a human would predict a match outcome.
If you add lots of good data to the AI training, then it should be able to predict quite well, similar to how a human does it.
If a human has never seen a match of a specific sport, then that human would be terrible predicting, same as the AI.
The more matches and statistics the human gets to experience, the better the human gets, same as the AI.
very simple explanation but easy to understand.
but even though AI predictions will be the same as human predictions in general, I'm still not sure about the predictions made by AI.
because I personally am sometimes skeptical of other people's predictions, whether it's from social media or whatever form the prediction is, I don't believe it. I prefer the predictions that I plan myself.
and I'm sure, there will be people who share my thoughts.