Topic: [POLL] Using AI to predict outcomes - page 59. (Read 10120 times)
I don't think AIs are reliable when it comes to predictions. There are other ways for is to predict the results rather than relying on the programmed software. You can create your own analysis simply by searching about the capability of the players or reading comments from different platforms about sports analytics and fanatics. I've been just reading and getting ideas on this forum when it comes to sportsbetting and I find it more reliable.
I’m a little bit surprised that people aren’t interested in the possibility of having AI place bets for you on sporting events. I guess the current implementation of AI would probably just pick whoever had the best odds, but I’d like to think it’s possible for it to analyze individual matchups and make a more thought out prediction. I think it’s worth giving a try and I may do it at some point. Maybe I’ll post the results so people can see.
I'll take my chances on my own instincts and analysis.
But if ever they will let it go public (of course without payment) then I might consider their choices and use it as a useful piece of information to heighten my chance of winning.
We know how sports can also be unpredictable a lot of times and I have a share of experience with it too. I've won betting for heavy underdogs and lost a lot trusting the favorites and yet until now I cannot say I am good at guessing which will win even after analysis.
But if ever they will let it go public (of course without payment) then I might consider their choices and use it as a useful piece of information to heighten my chance of winning.
We know how sports can also be unpredictable a lot of times and I have a share of experience with it too. I've won betting for heavy underdogs and lost a lot trusting the favorites and yet until now I cannot say I am good at guessing which will win even after analysis.
It would be definitely a profitable thing if AI could predict it correctly but you have to understand some stuff is not possible to do, is just random and that randomness can't be calculated in any bet. Martingale is a great example of that, you know what the chances are that you would hit loss 10 times in a row at a flip of a coin? It is miniscule, do you know what the chance are if you flip it 1 million times?
It's almost guaranteed it will happen at least once, probably more than 5 times. That is why the randomness prevents the AI to ever be right, it will tell you what "should" happen at best guess, but can't come close to what will actually happen.
It's almost guaranteed it will happen at least once, probably more than 5 times. That is why the randomness prevents the AI to ever be right, it will tell you what "should" happen at best guess, but can't come close to what will actually happen.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
If I could, I would definitely use AI for sports betting predictions. Not because I think I would be winning all the time, but rather to try this new tool.
Unfortunately I can't create an account from where I live right now
and VPN isn't helping here as well. But I will be watching this thread to see the results of other people trying. Thanks for creating it, @OgNasty!
Yeah, I would use AI to help me with my betting strategy. While the AI software would gather all the available data for a specific bet and select the most probable outcome, I would take of the human part of the investigation and would certainly have a very positive outcome. Moreover, many Casinos already use AI to collect data about their users playing habits.
Most of the A.I. result are depends on how many articles and people opinions are predicting the winners, so this mean the A.I. result will be the favorite fighter or team. It's not surprising if people are bet on the favorite fighter or team because this bet has higher chance to win. But the thing is usually some matches end with upset and the odds if you bet on favorite fighter/team didn't cover your wrong bet. So if you think betting on favorite fighter or team will guarantee to make profit, you're wrong.
I would just bank on my previous post regarding my statement where I said I would use AI if it does get mature. Thing is, AI matures when more prompts and info is fed to it. So if people want AI to be useful to them, it is imperative that we use AI for things like these, so it can have time to be good at what we want it to be good at. Otherwise ChatGPT will just become a nifty tool we use for some activities and will not become the google killer some AI visionaries hoped it could be.
If it reaches that point then you can be sure that casinos will then use that same AI to counter any attempt from gamblers to profit from it, and this will be way easier for them as they have all the data they may want so they can feed an AI and produce very good models which could predict the outcomes and odds to give to each game.So if anyone wants to do this the moment to try it is now as waiting any longer will make the possible use of an AI completely ineffective.
I bet to make matches interesting, not just for profit. So, no I wouldn't.
I don't think I would entrust my choice to an AI. Usually I only place bets when I somehow analyzed the matches. Although I don't really analyze them as if they're a school or work requirement, I usually feel at ease with my bets. And there's always this gut feeling as well. Aside from that, you also have favorite teams and players. All these can't be considered by an AI. So I don't think I would ask an AI which to bet.
I've never used it. And maybe not really interested in using it. I trust more with my own personal analysis in making predictions for sports betting. But maybe a lot of people will use it. namely those who lack confidence in the analysis they make, or simply don't have time to make predictive analysis (busy) then AI can be a solution so that they are not left behind to bet without having to spend time doing analysis. AI may always be right if the match results match the existing statistical data. but sporting events are often full of surprises and differ from the statistics presented. But for other types of casinos I think AI can be very useful.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
Using Artificial Intelligence to predict gambling outcomes might not be a bad idea because sometimes their predictions are right. They can also be of good help when a gambler has no knowledge about gambling predictions or how to analyze bets. It could also a be an advantage if a gamblers doesn't have time or opportunity to carryout a proper evaluation or analysis of the potential outcome of a game.
But the truth is that, there can be no substitute to human predictions because a software can develop faults or can be attacked by hackers or viruses which can make their prediction wrong. Also, these machines might require power or sometimes internet connections to functions. Which means that places that lack such facilities would not enjoy its services. The human brain is far more sophisticated than these AIs, which entails that the brain is more dependable, dynamic and reliable.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
Artificial intelligence has evolved a lot in the last 2 years in all sectors.
Many people and companies are using AI to make their business more profitable and secure as well.
I'm sure the best betting sites already use AI to help predict the outcome of many games and consequently increase your winnings.
We know that in some aspects AI will not be able to replace the human mind, but in several others it manages to be able to overcome people, mainly in matters where the emotional can interfere in decision-making.
So my conclusion is that AI can help players improve their earnings if used wisely and disciplined in conjunction with human decisions.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
Artificial Intelligence works in a way that it will gather the previous data and based on it, it will predict the future outcome of the sporting event. But we need to know does it really apply in the real sports ? Deos always the team with good records wins more often and how will this AI system predict the underdog's wins?
Maybe AI results are 60-70% right but it is not a 90-100% accurate way to predict the matches results.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
I am still in the camp that artificial intelligence still doesn't even exist, technically. To me artificial intelligence is a self learning program, obviously something that does not exist yet. Maybe I'm wrong about the technicalities here, just how I feel.
Now I would certainly let an "AI" program help me in making my decision for making bets, especially if I'm on the fence with a certain bet and need a "tie-breaker" so to speak, but I certainly wouldn't trust it 100%.
AI is man-made and it does really need up to continue to be fed up with information or including into its library for it to be that much more better as time goes by but just like the rest
that it isnt something that you could fully rely on it 100% when it comes to your betting decisions.They cant able to know on what are the current happenings and events
that might happen before the match starts which it is really hard to point out.
Well, the best AI algorithms out there were saying that Brazil would win the world cup, so they're not very accurate.
Since nothing will be very accurate, I much prefer oracular animals like Paul the Octopus (RIP)
At least they're more fun to watch than AI.
Since nothing will be very accurate, I much prefer oracular animals like Paul the Octopus (RIP)
At least they're more fun to watch than AI.
ChatGPT is all the rage at the moment. I’ve seen that people are asking it to predict sporting events. Would you leave gambling decisions up to artificial intelligence? Do you see any potential drawbacks for outsourcing your bets to a software program? Has anyone here tried this yet? Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
I am still in the camp that artificial intelligence still doesn't even exist, technically. To me artificial intelligence is a self learning program, obviously something that does not exist yet. Maybe I'm wrong about the technicalities here, just how I feel.
Now I would certainly let an "AI" program help me in making my decision for making bets, especially if I'm on the fence with a certain bet and need a "tie-breaker" so to speak, but I certainly wouldn't trust it 100%.
Do we need someone to put together a thread of ChatGPT predictions to see how accurate they are? Any other thoughts?
May be on the next Saturday I will try with Lotto LOLI don't think these AI can beat human brain. They are called artificial. With the ChatGPT what I understand is, they scrape the entire internet and bring information from the past. When you are talking about prediction of a lottery or any sports then only the stats are not enough. The humen factors play the vital roles too.
Were they able to predict who was going be the World cup champion? May be ask them who will win the UCL of the current season?
short answer: no.
long answer: predicting the exact result of a sporting match is objectively difficult and it is not certain that past results can be used to predict the future.
there are too many unknowns and too many variables to take into account. There are algorithms to predict outcomes but these can barely outperform and achieve a minimum of statistical significance.
Beware of using such a product to predict options with 2 or 3 outcomes, like a tennis or soccer match. already there is an intrinsic statistic (33% / 50% of choosing the correct event).
Probably it would work on games such as dice, but I also doubt that it would be useful on something such as sportsbetting. Analyzation in sports prediction is subjective wherein if you know the players(both prospect and enemy team) it would help a gambler to decide which is which. But QI would more likely base on stats of the players to come up with a guess which we all know won't determine the outcome simply because performances of players tend to change on each game. In line with games wherein AI could be a huge help are games which has patterns or algorithms wherein a normal individual would have a hard time determining winning combinations. long answer: predicting the exact result of a sporting match is objectively difficult and it is not certain that past results can be used to predict the future.
there are too many unknowns and too many variables to take into account. There are algorithms to predict outcomes but these can barely outperform and achieve a minimum of statistical significance.
Beware of using such a product to predict options with 2 or 3 outcomes, like a tennis or soccer match. already there is an intrinsic statistic (33% / 50% of choosing the correct event).
That's a good idea if someone comes up with a merge of screenshots and what chatgpt ai said for the predictions like in sporting events and let's see if it's too intelligent enough to be afraid of.
Maybe another gambler developer might think of something new where it'll be useful for the bettors. But I don't think that they'll ever come up to that point where they'll have almost perfect accuracy. They can predict, no problem with that but accuracy will be the matter.
Maybe another gambler developer might think of something new where it'll be useful for the bettors. But I don't think that they'll ever come up to that point where they'll have almost perfect accuracy. They can predict, no problem with that but accuracy will be the matter.
Jump to: