Topic: [POR]⚡ELECTRONEUM⚡Official Moderated Thread - page 96. (Read 240363 times)
except about 42 of your 45 MH is rented by devs. I don't recall other coins needing life support after a fork.
I am running V2 of the node but I cannot sync anymore. I guess there has been an update but this is the latest version on their website. I get the following error :-
2018-06-04 12:00:55.047 [P2P5] WARN global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:273 [1;31m[195.201.82.83:57038 INC] peer claims higher version that we think - we may be forked from the network and a software upgrade may be needed[0m
Can anyone help ?
2018-06-04 12:00:55.047 [P2P5] WARN global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:273 [1;31m[195.201.82.83:57038 INC] peer claims higher version that we think - we may be forked from the network and a software upgrade may be needed[0m
Can anyone help ?
Hm i dont know but i think nanopool or miningpoolhub can also help u, they are running pools on the newest ETN version.
I am running V2 of the node but I cannot sync anymore. I guess there has been an update but this is the latest version on their website. I get the following error :-
2018-06-04 12:00:55.047 [P2P5] WARN global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:273 [1;31m[195.201.82.83:57038 INC] peer claims higher version that we think - we may be forked from the network and a software upgrade may be needed[0m
Can anyone help ?
2018-06-04 12:00:55.047 [P2P5] WARN global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:273 [1;31m[195.201.82.83:57038 INC] peer claims higher version that we think - we may be forked from the network and a software upgrade may be needed[0m
Can anyone help ?
wouldn't like to be mean, but i have to comment that this show must end one way or another
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
I'd like to share my point of view regarding the comparison with other coins and since you mention the AEON...
- AEON has an average of 30,000$ daily volume vs 500,000$ ETN's volume.
- AEON has an averege of 0.8 MH/s after their fork vs ETN's 45.5 MH/s.
- AEON was released June 06, 2014 vs ETN's October 30, 2017.
- The ETN changed a part of the code which (as far as I know) no other Cryptonight coin has changed. This led us to uncharted areas and caused some short-term problems with the many pendings transactions which were created before the code change. (More technical details on that can be found on a post few places before that)
Many coins are 1on1 copies (some with small changes), ETN isn't a simple copy from Monero.
ETN is an very tweaked monero.
You can't compare it with other coins what has forked. Also the diff was very, very high because of al the asic miners. Other coins also didnt had this problem.
If it was just an copy from monero i would totally agree with you, however it is not a simple copy. And problems are there to be fixed
ETN is an very tweaked monero.
You can't compare it with other coins what has forked. Also the diff was very, very high because of al the asic miners. Other coins also didnt had this problem.
If it was just an copy from monero i would totally agree with you, however it is not a simple copy. And problems are there to be fixed
Even more reason than to have a good dev team and experts.
Just in generally: I personally have my problems with projects that have good marketing teams, 1000 advisors, make daily a video, have mods/admins on
20 channels but only 1 dev. (Just as an example).
In my opinion the technical advance must be priority, than everything else. Just as a side note as i see many projects focus a lot on marketing but fail to
deliver/develope technicaly..... The best example for that is Verge, hype and always back to the roots.... I have still believe in this project, but as we are
on day 6 now without transacations (maybe even without accepted blocks?!) i strongly advice to investe more on the technically side.
wouldn't like to be mean, but i have to comment that this show must end one way or another
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
Many coins are 1on1 copies (some with small changes), ETN isn't a simple copy from Monero.
ETN is an very tweaked monero.
You can't compare it with other coins what has forked. Also the diff was very, very high because of al the asic miners. Other coins also didnt had this problem.
If it was just an copy from monero i would totally agree with you, however it is not a simple copy. And problems are there to be fixed
wouldn't like to be mean, but i have to comment that this show must end one way or another
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
so many coins changed algo succesfully with minimal issues.
yesterday AEON forked and all went smoothly, at least from what i understand.
can't really think of anything else than a suggestion to ETN team to hire devs to do the job. It is so obvious that there is incompetence in there.
If ETN want to do something more than to have the luck of a failed coin initiative, then they will need to take action now, still it might already too late.
(little hodler of ETN till the death of the coin)
Nanopool has a static difficulty of 240000 and I can't CPU mine with them. Even though I've got an 8600k and I get a decent 350 h/s, I'm not able to find a single hash within time before they move on with a new "equation" or whatever it's called.
I used to mine at spacepool, those guys updated their pool alongside nanopool and they were always rewarding the expected amount of ETN, no stealing or anything. However it seems that everyone is on Nanopool at the moment trying to push forward the first few blocks so I'm kinda stuck at the moment.
I mined with 3 Nvidia cards the first days without getting any reward just to support the network, but now I've sold one of the 3 cards so it's very likely I won't be finding any shares with 240k diff from the pool. Also I'd like to put my hashpower where it'll be rewarded.
So... sorry but this miner is out until I can CPU mine again!
I used to mine at spacepool, those guys updated their pool alongside nanopool and they were always rewarding the expected amount of ETN, no stealing or anything. However it seems that everyone is on Nanopool at the moment trying to push forward the first few blocks so I'm kinda stuck at the moment.
I mined with 3 Nvidia cards the first days without getting any reward just to support the network, but now I've sold one of the 3 cards so it's very likely I won't be finding any shares with 240k diff from the pool. Also I'd like to put my hashpower where it'll be rewarded.
So... sorry but this miner is out until I can CPU mine again!
I am mining on nanopool with r9 290 tri-x and i get my shares, yes the diff is high but not to high for an r9 290 trix. I get around the 1kh/s with default clocks, little undervolt and i get rewards from the blocks we find.
1080Ti is similair like the R9 290 tri-x on cryptonight, so you should also get shares, even with 1 card (huw i tought u told u was using 3x 1080
when i read ur comment now i only see something about nvidia) But yes, it would be beter if u can choose the difficulty on nanopool. Maybe they can fix this after the rewards from ETN are payed.
Nanopool has a static difficulty of 240000 and I can't CPU mine with them. Even though I've got an 8600k and I get a decent 350 h/s, I'm not able to find a single hash within time before they move on with a new "equation" or whatever it's called.
I used to mine at spacepool, those guys updated their pool alongside nanopool and they were always rewarding the expected amount of ETN, no stealing or anything. However it seems that everyone is on Nanopool at the moment trying to push forward the first few blocks so I'm kinda stuck at the moment.
I mined with 3 Nvidia cards the first days without getting any reward just to support the network, but now I've sold one of the 3 cards so it's very likely I won't be finding any shares with 240k diff from the pool. Also I'd like to put my hashpower where it'll be rewarded.
So... sorry but this miner is out until I can CPU mine again!
I used to mine at spacepool, those guys updated their pool alongside nanopool and they were always rewarding the expected amount of ETN, no stealing or anything. However it seems that everyone is on Nanopool at the moment trying to push forward the first few blocks so I'm kinda stuck at the moment.
I mined with 3 Nvidia cards the first days without getting any reward just to support the network, but now I've sold one of the 3 cards so it's very likely I won't be finding any shares with 240k diff from the pool. Also I'd like to put my hashpower where it'll be rewarded.
So... sorry but this miner is out until I can CPU mine again!
What's happening with the payment? I have like 37 and still mining.
No worries. You'll get your payment. You'll have to wait for the blockchain to start processing transactions again. Should be working in the next few days.
Yeah, if there come some more miners now, it could be even today (?).
What's happening with the payment? I have like 37 and still mining.
No worries. You'll get your payment. You'll have to wait for the blockchain to start processing transactions again. Should be working in the next few days.
What's happening with the payment? I have like 37 and still mining.
They have other priorities for now ...
What's happening with the payment? I have like 37 and still mining.
Why are things so slow after the tech update/fork? Read up!
As far as all this goes? well I am no coder but it seems they sure missed a few potential conflicts on how the new code would perceive all that was in the transaction pool. Not to mention the massive hash rate and difficulty to step down from.
But this, this in particular should not have been left to chance or not took into account with the fork"
Transactions could only have a ring size of 1. However, there were some transactions in the transaction pool from before the fork that have ring sizes of 5. And processing these transactions after the update is what caused problems.
Thats all I'm saying lol oh well hind sight is 20/20 right? hope they straighten it out. Who knows it may take a fork to fix a fork
As far as all this goes? well I am no coder but it seems they sure missed a few potential conflicts on how the new code would perceive all that was in the transaction pool. Not to mention the massive hash rate and difficulty to step down from.
But this, this in particular should not have been left to chance or not took into account with the fork"
Transactions could only have a ring size of 1. However, there were some transactions in the transaction pool from before the fork that have ring sizes of 5. And processing these transactions after the update is what caused problems.
Thats all I'm saying lol oh well hind sight is 20/20 right? hope they straighten it out. Who knows it may take a fork to fix a fork
I continue to HODL
Actually you have not many options in the moment other than HODL, lol, i doubt you could transfer the funds to an exchange (just kidding
) I continue to HODL
Actually you have not many options in the moment other than HODL, lol, i doubt you could transfer the funds to an exchange (just kidding
) Interest in this coin has not dropped at all. 168k plus active mobile miners atm
Mobile miners are not mining on the main blockchain, well they are not really mining at all, but that is another story. That said it is indeed a good sign that this coin still super popular considering all the tech issues. Once they finally fix those I can see it going to a all time high in the next bull market. I continue to HODL
i´m mining on Nanopool. Will we get the Bonus for mining the first 26 Blocks?
Or is there a new Bonus for more blocks? I want to help mining unitl difficult goes down but i have to pay for Energy.
Or is there a new Bonus for more blocks? I want to help mining unitl difficult goes down but i have to pay for Energy.
Are you able to login to your mobile wallet? I don't receive the mail for device activation....
I don't have any problem to get access to my account on my mobile phone it working smoothly if you are trying to register new account than there will be some kind of issues right now and that's why you are facing trouble to receive activation email so take a breath it will arrive when network will be stable.
Where can i see real stats of the blockchain? to track the difficulty and network hash, because all i can fin is outdated info
https://etn.nanopool.org/stats Jump to: