Pages:
Author

Topic: Pre-ICO bonuses - page 6. (Read 4564 times)

full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
October 20, 2017, 12:53:52 PM
Dear bonuses are not bad for ICO or pre ico. because it's a great opportunity for us.
bonus is a good policy for the marketing. I think bonus a good way to influence the investor.
I feel 50% or 100% bonus it's not a matter for any project. Major issue the project are innovative perfect or scam project.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 107
October 20, 2017, 10:27:39 AM
I surmise that the expanded rewards is a promoting trap which makes the ICO satisfying to the eye and are given to draw in more speculators, however the accomplishment of the ICO does not exclusively depend on it. Maybe yes it might be inconvenient to the ICO achievement however there are significantly more factors to it. In any case, I concur with you that giving too high level of reward is excessively, a 100% pre-ICO is even insane.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
October 20, 2017, 07:35:19 AM
Hi

In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.

If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
 Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?

Yes, I totally agree. if a 100% bonus is offered, then there must be a massive temptation to dump immediately - even if you only sell at ICO price, you make an instant 100% profit. This sort of situation will attract many people who aren't interested in the project and just want some easy money.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
October 20, 2017, 06:44:55 AM
40% from reOrder. ICO starts November 7th. Hurry up to get a real discount from the real project Smiley I DO really like their product and believe that it can be and must be developed further.
full member
Activity: 310
Merit: 102
JACS.tech
October 06, 2017, 11:31:59 AM
We're currently in the same situation where we're thinking of the 'nice & safe' discount % for the Pre-ICO.....IMO; any % between 25-30 from the ICO price is optimum and safe to protect the potential ICO investors
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
October 06, 2017, 11:19:30 AM
I think as long as the system is worked out correctly (i.e. not giving away a huge amount of tokens in the pre-sale) then i think it's a nice concept.

Why shouldn't early adopters get more? their investments might allow them to have a budget for marketing or hire that new developer.

I would just be weary of any bonuses that give over 40%.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
October 02, 2017, 10:23:49 AM
I also think that pre-ICO bonuses must be more opened for people, oftenly, it's hide and only small group of informed clients know about it.
More information can bring more investments, more clients and more popularity.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 101
September 29, 2017, 12:02:54 AM
Hi

In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.

If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
 Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
yes i agree. its true pre sale means for investor to gain some bonuses. but its doesnt mean we would gain a profit from the bonuses that we got from pre sale cause price/ value is determined by market and we dont know what will come to us . we only could predict the market.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
September 28, 2017, 07:41:12 PM
many of the several projects that deliver a promo with ICO 100% in order for investors interested in the project but with limited support in the short time the Division of tokennnya ... but I've been following the project that gives bonuses by 30% only but create very happy
what does it mean "tokennya?".
pre-ico bonus is very profitable but very risky because we can not guarantee that the coins we buy will be successful and listed on the exchange, you better invest only in projects that have a guarantee to buy back
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
September 28, 2017, 07:37:25 PM
many of the several projects that deliver a promo with ICO 100% in order for investors interested in the project but with limited support in the short time the Division of tokennnya ... but I've been following the project that gives bonuses by 30% only but create very happy
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
September 28, 2017, 07:25:58 PM
In the case of Experimental, we only accept 300 people on our PRE-ICO, only engaged crypto enthusiasts that are not here just for speculation. We want to create a community that can suggest and discuss ideas. No bonuses, not speculation. https://e11.io
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 524
September 28, 2017, 07:05:00 PM
Hi

In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.

If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
 Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?

What you are telling is true that when the offer is very sweet like giving 100% of bonus means the developer is not serious about his project and that ICO is only pump and dump coin. So who ever is going to invest in that coin should better sell of the coins when it hits exchange as you will get the coin in 50% lesser then what price they sold on launching day.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
September 28, 2017, 06:53:27 PM
Auctus whitelist is almost finished! We have 20% bonus at presale.

Subscribe at Auctus.org  =)
hero member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 507
September 28, 2017, 06:49:10 PM
I personally dont like bonus for ICOs, i feel like its a shady practice. And these usually come in ICOs with INSANELY high hard caps (or no hard caps at all in place).

For me the best ICOs do it like Kyber did - set up a maximum that a single person can buy (2-3eth is good, so you dont create whales right off the bat) and dont offer bonuses for earlier buyers.
Too much bonus for ICO will make the price of token get dumped, the whale dont care about future of token, they just dump it at the price of ICO because they have overwhelming amount of bonus, that's why many ico with too much presale bonus will have bad rate in the future.
I do agree, kyber is best, but I think the limitation can be bypassed right?
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
September 28, 2017, 06:39:17 PM
foodcoin.io had a great multiplier bonus of 1.35 and 1.7 . Does anyone know of any others coming up in the short term?

I've just found out a very promising one.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annico-artoken-decentralized-arvr-ecosystem-for-3d-content-exchange-2135473
It seems like they've got a great potential of their tokens, also because they're gonna create a wide marketplace ecosystem for a visual content. That's cool! Just started reading their whitepaper, will see how it goes


That's really cool! It looks like you could have good bonuses if you invest early. Did you see their bounty campaigns? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountyar-artoken-by-cappasity-extending-the-arvr-double-stakes-2141145

I've never thought about it, but actually, it's a great idea to earn some tokens even before the ICO start
I also haven't but want to try! 


Did you try it since last week? ARtoken looks like a pretty interesting ICO, but they made some changes in the project... some of them differently good, but maybe I just don't see something important...
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
September 28, 2017, 06:31:24 PM
Hi

In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.

If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
 Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
I also do not like the idea of early bonuses, that makes people rush towards investing their money without taking the time to research the project and if the bonuses are very large then early investors will probably sell their coins and obtain fast profits with their bonuses.

What could be a reasonable bonus size in your opinion?
Zero, that is the only reasonable size, any size other than that creates an incentive to invest in the project to get fast profits instead of being there for the long term, of course such a project is not going to have as much attention as one with huge bonuses but it gives a more serious impression than other icos that seem to want to grab as much money as possible and as fast as they can.

Why should not the organizers encourage those who believe in the project and support it from the very beginning?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 523
September 22, 2017, 01:35:09 PM
Some projects need just to attract investors by giving %100 bonus, but most new ICOs give up to %50 only, which is fair, however the early backers period is very short with limited amount of tokens in most of ICOs, and sometimes all tokens go to venture capitals.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 100
September 22, 2017, 01:32:53 PM

I've received these two answers about the differences between pre-sale and whitelist. I hope it could help someone too.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22090921
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22101794
Thanks! That's handy

I finally found this explanation here https://blog.artoken.io/announcing-whitelist-application-why-we-chose-not-to-do-a-pre-sale-243db0923843 - seems to become more clear now
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1020
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
September 22, 2017, 01:26:12 PM
Hi

In most of ICOs, investors can get some bonuses, if they invest sooner. In my opinion these bonuses not only don't cause the ICO to be successful, but also cause the ICO to fail. In some ICOs there is up to 100% bonus.

If I see that there are some people have gotten 100% bonus in pre-ICO, I don't invest in that ICO, Because they will dump their coins after crowdsale and cause the price to fall.
 Do you agree with me? What are your opinions?
100% bonus? Wow thats generous and i didnt see any ICO did able to give that big discount for their pre-sale.Its too much i guess because the thing i do encounter i do see only 25% below.I guess its just enough to have these bonuses because it is also one of the factors to get some investors which would really fund up the project but 100%? Ill think i pass on that one.
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 10
September 22, 2017, 01:22:05 PM

I think youre right. Pre sales with a huge bonus get dumped the most time and the price will stay arround the ICO price! I love presales where the community gets added to whitelist. More people that are interested in the project going to invest and they dont dump their coins, because they believe in the project.

I am curious to know more about the whitelists - is that something standard what people do? and how it differs from the ordinary pre-sale? Do people not get any coins before ICO in this case, but just book for some amount? or what? any special topic on the whitelists?


I also wanted to know more.. I've just asked the same question here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22090367
As I understood these guys have a whitelist and don't have pre-sale. Will see what they say..


I've received these two answers about the differences between pre-sale and whitelist. I hope it could help someone too.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22090921
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22101794
Pages:
Jump to: